2000 Mules

Frank Apisa said:
Yup...a shooting war between the factions.

Oh, well...the American conservatives have been itching for this fight...so I guess it will have to happen. American conservatives backed the wrong (and eventually losing) side during Revolutionary days...and American conservatives backed the wrong (and eventually losing)
side during the Civil War days. Gotta wonder how things will work out this time.
Click to expand...

Uh, America won the Revolutionary war, brah.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Yup...a shooting war between the factions.

Oh, well...the American conservatives have been itching for this fight...so I guess it will have to happen. American conservatives backed the wrong (and eventually losing) side during Revolutionary days...and American conservatives backed the wrong (and eventually losing)
side during the Civil War days. Gotta wonder how things will work out this time.
Click to expand...

Nobody said I had to shoot them to death. I could scare them motherfuckers and have them steppin' and fetchin' and shittin' their pants without killing any of them or firing any bullets, even.

:laugh:

I ain't the one to fuck with. I got a slightly older girly cousin I could call for advice on how to proceed. :laugh:
 
martin said:
Even if the drop-off method was illegal that particular illegality would not invalidate proper ballots. You're just swallowing what the video told you. Look up the law and you'll find a different story.
Secondly, they have video evidence without confirmation that the drop off procedure was illegal. Laws vary on who may and may not drop off ballots. Thirdly, you're assuming that all of the ballots, or enough of them, were Biden votes and have no proof whatsoever of that little detail. How many of those "2000 mules" have been identified and linked to the DNC?
Click to expand...
There is no proper chain of custody for the ballot because they were illegally trafficked so those votes are in fact invalid and the have enough ballots coming from heavily Biden strongholds and from 5 different liberal organization (BLM was one of them) going to ballot box after ballot box after ballot box. That have on mule that visited 5 Liberal organizations and 28 ballot boxes in a single trip.
 
ExpressLane said:
There is no proper chain of custody for the ballot because they were illegally trafficked so those votes are in fact invalid and the have enough ballots coming from heavily Biden strongholds and from 5 different liberal organization (BLM was one of them) going to ballot box after ballot box after ballot box. That have on mule that visited 5 Liberal organizations and 28 ballot boxes in a single trip.
Click to expand...

Do you know what the "trafficking" rules are, if any, and in what way tens of thousands of ballots were "trafficked" illegally?

You ignored the little matter of whether the ballots themselves are legal regardless of how they got to the election offices, but let's start with the above.
 
Earl said:
Read it again, Pobre.

"... or with the intent of influencing any judge..."

Why do you think they are protesting ...before the final vote and release next month?
Click to expand...

You might want to read the entire sentence.

“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Interesting little note. The Supreme court doesn't have judges. It has justices. Are you attempting to demote the USSC justices?

I don't think the protesters are attempting to stop the justices from voting. The justices duty is to vote on the cases before them.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Stone, same thing applies to you as I said to RB. Love to sit and down a few brews and have a few laughs. I CLEARLY AND EASILY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BOTH SIDES HAVE VALID POINTS...AND THE AISLE SIDE I FAVOR IS NOT "ALWAY RIGHT."

The present Supreme Court has a huge conservative bent...and it happened because Mitch McConnell refused to allow Obama to appoint a justice so close to an election (9 months)...and because Mitch McConnell RUSHED through a Trump appointee just weeks before another election.

And a monumental decision seems to have been made by that court...one that changes the way things have been for over 70 years.

Conservatives here are worked up in anger over people PEACEFULLY protesting that...while at the same time excusing the behavior of a crowd attempting to overturn a legitimate election in a decidedly NON-PEACEFUL way.

How do we reconcile stuff like that?

How do we reconcile the REASONABLE distress of people who realize that the citizens of conservative states have such a power advantage over the citizens of progressive states in the Senate and in the Electoral College?
Click to expand...

Not sure ANYONE here is mad at people peacefully protesting. Im sure not,....in fact I could care less. But the key word is PEACEFULLY. It has been reported that there was in fact violence at some of the protests. If so, that kind of thing should be tolerated by NOBODY.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I am curious if you even know the difference between a judge and a jurist. I'm betting not.
Click to expand...

you know why you are a shit stain?

its like how a glacier cuts though the earth leaving a trail in its path - but you aren't a glacier - you are a smelly piece of shit - and you leave a smelly trail of shit in your path.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I am curious if you even know the difference between a judge and a jurist. I'm betting not.
Click to expand...
You tell us.


ju·rist
/ˈjo͝orəst/
an expert in or writer on law.
NORTH AMERICAN
a lawyer or a judge. https://www.google.com/search?q=jur...12j0i512l3.3759j1j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


Definition of jurist
: one having a thorough knowledge of law
especially : JUDGE https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jurist



jurist
noun [ C ] LAW specialized
US /ˈdʒʊr.ɪst/ UK /ˈdʒʊə.rɪst/

an expert in law, especially a judge
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/jurist
 
Last edited:
ExpressLane said:
2000 Mules is very good but very disturbing. They is now documented by government security camera video of widescale illegal vote trafficking. The numbers of illegally trafficked vote could have easily influenced the outcome of the 2020 election. If you believe in holding fair and honest elections you should watch the video. If you want to have illegal Banana Republic elections by all means don't watch it and then try to discredit it. I strongly suspect the JPP Liberals will go for Banana Republic elections. (A couple of the typical thread graffiti artists have be banned.)
Click to expand...

Wow, a new theory on how it was stolen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top