1AM - Mueller team wrote for PUBLIC release. Actual evidence "alarming & significant"

rjhenn said:
It tells us that the both of you haven't got an actual argument, and that you're terrified that Mueller found actual evidence of both collusion and obstruction and probably other crimes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


Only in YOUR dreams ....
 
Wolverine said:
Anything More? No collusion no conspiring, give it up , although I know you turds can't. This is a ploy to bolster any libturds chances in 2020
Click to expand...
We haven't seen the report yet. Nothing but a 'summary' by a Trump stooge. The obstruction continues!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
You mean the vision that we've been following for the past couple of hundred years or so, or Trump's and your vision of turning us into a banana republic, with him as President for life?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
”President for life,” good grief, are you ill?

Read the Constitution.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,



You wish.

Your calls to move on before anything more is learned are nothing but you giving the President a big fat free pass.

And the same question goes to you as others:

If you can't even get Mueller's name correct, what ELSE are you getting wrong?
Click to expand...

The better question is what have I gotten wrong lol?

I’ve been saying for TWO YEARS that collision was baloney and the obstruction charge was weak.
 
anatta said:
cite - i see no such claim, besides who cares what investigators tell reporters?
The summaries are internal summaries of the section of interest covered in the report.
They will come out when the report is redacted as well
Click to expand...
You mean when the report is thoroughly whitewashed.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
If rjhenn is right then their boy Mullet is in deep trouble for lying to Barr. Either way rjhenn is going to be miserable. :laugh:
 
rjhenn said:
We haven't seen the report yet. Nothing but a 'summary' by a Trump stooge. The obstruction continues!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
What particular statute of the obstruction law is being violated?
I’ll understand if you don’t know.

You had your investigation...you lost. How do you prefer that your crow be cooked?
 
Earl said:
The Mueller Report is required by law to be reviewed by the Attorney General and released per US laws and J/D rulers and policies. Not by "investigators."

Judge Andrew Napolitano has weighed in on the forthcoming release of the Mueller report, providing a legal explanation for why it's paramount that Attorney General William Barr keep some elements of the investigation private.

The Fox News senior judicial analyst made the case as Democrats are planning to subpoena the unredacted Mueller report, which will put the Attorney General in a position with several options.

"When the subpoena arrives, the Attorney General can ignore it. Knowing him, I don't think he will," Judge Nap said Tuesday morning on "Fox & Friends."

"He will say 'We're not going to comply,' or he will move to a federal judge to cross the subpoena and the whole thing will go from Congress to a federal judge."

He added that under United States law, there are certain details of the report that Barr is prohibited from revealing, including details about individuals connected to the investigation who have not been charged with any crime."

This has been explained over and over and over. Move on.
Click to expand...
Fox news is hardly known for objectivity.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
It tells us that the both of you haven't got an actual argument, and that you're terrified that Mueller found actual evidence of both collusion and obstruction and probably other crimes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

In order to believe that, we’d have to believe Barr, Rosenstein and some others would risk *an actual obstruction charge* to do—what?

Save Trump, while their asses are carted off to prison? Gimme a break. Is there any conspiracy theory that is too theoretical for you goof balls?

That’s a rhetorical question.
 
Earl said:
Yo comprendo, senorita. The left does not comprenden. Or they pretend that they do not understand.
Click to expand...

Oh, we understand. Barr will only let us see what Trump wants us to see. The exact opposite of what we as Americans expect from our government. But exactly what one would expect from Trump and the right.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Earl said:
Are you a criminal, the laws and J/D policies and rules pertaining to the release of the Mueller Report must be followed. It's the LAW.
Click to expand...
Funny, the LAW doesn't matter when it's Trump that's breaking it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top