18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

Damocles said:
To which? His daughter testified to the first, saying that she believed him because she respected him, you supposedly watched that "investigation" and therefore must have seen the video of her being questioned (though you must not have actually watched as you were saying it started with Cheney when it did not, several Democratic Congresscritters spoke before her) and the second part was on a TV interview. I'll see if I can find it.
Click to expand...

The part where he said he doesn’t think Trump violated the law.
 
Damocles said:
Yeah, I'll see if I can find that one. It was an interview after day 1 of the "hearings".
Click to expand...

Barr got slammed last year for being "disengenous" in his comments about Trump. Maybe a year makes a difference?

Do you really believe Trump is innocent of seeking to use violence to overturn the election, Damo?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...bstruction-memo-prepared-barr-russia-n1266355
Judge orders DOJ to release Trump obstruction memo, says Barr was 'disingenuous'
A federal judge has ruled that former Attorney General William Barr was “disingenuous” about the process behind his decision to issue a memo clearing then-President Trump on obstruction of justice charges.

At issue is a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking, among other things, a Justice Department memo that Barr said helped guide his decision to declare that the evidence described in special counsel Robert Mueller's report on his investigation into Trump did not support a charge of obstruction, even leaving aside the policy against indicting a sitting president.

The DOJ had refused to give the March 24, 2019, memorandum to a government transparency group, saying the document represented the private advice of lawyers — before any formal decision had been made — and was therefore exempt from disclosure.
Click to expand...
 
Jarod said:
I do not believe the above statute requires the president to encourage violence, Barr seem to suggest that he felt it did. A president would simply have to have known or should have known that he lost, and then worked with another person to try to remain in office past his term.
Click to expand...

Trump explicitly encouraged violence. "Fight!"
 
Jarod said:
"If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor."


This seems to be the easiest statute to prove Trump violated. . .

If Trump knew or should have known he lost AND he conspired with one or more person and they took action to keep him in office, he has broken this criminal law.
Click to expand...

On flag day ought to make it more challenging to determine who's putting on a latent cross conditioned patriot act of Islamidiotocracy Christiananality pedophilia under color of law....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top