14-Year-Old Pregnant Rape Victim Slut-Shamed in Indiana

While it's very hard to even read patriot66's post due to lack of punctuation and grammar and poor spelling .... really, I normally don't comment on that, but his post was very bad...but I think I figured out what he was saying....he's blaming Gosnell on pro-choice people. No, he's wrong.

The reason Gosnell got patients is because the harder it is to get an abortion, the more expensive it is and the fewer providers there are; and the more expensive it is the longer it takes women to save the money so their abortions are later in the pregnancy. At that point, they had no option but Gosnell - cheaper, would do later abortions. He was a butcher, but what option did they have?

It's the anti-choice people that have driven so many doctors out of doing abortions. Fewer doctors doing abortions, cost goes up and butchers like Gosnell look good.

We need abortions to be safe, legal, inexpensive. I'd also prefer they be rare - I would love if every kid was taught about birth control and if no one ever got raped or molested and if no woman ever got pregnant by a man who then deserted her, leaving her with her existing kids and no way to afford the new one. Oh, a perfect world would be wonderful!

But everything the anti-choicers do works against this - they are against teaching birth control in the schools; they are against affordable birth control; they don't even like some of the forms of birth control; they don't support women who have kids with funding for child programs or day care.

Don't blame Gosnell on pro-choicers. He's a direct result of the anti-choice movement that has so restricted the number of abortion providers and that has raised the cost of them.
 
While it's very hard to even read patriot66's post due to lack of punctuation and grammar and poor spelling .... really, I normally don't comment on that, but his post was very bad...but I think I figured out what he was saying....he's blaming Gosnell on pro-choice people. No, he's wrong.

The reason Gosnell got patients is because the harder it is to get an abortion, the more expensive it is and the fewer providers there are; and the more expensive it is the longer it takes women to save the money so their abortions are later in the pregnancy. At that point, they had no option but Gosnell - cheaper, would do later abortions. He was a butcher, but what option did they have?

It's the anti-choice people that have driven so many doctors out of doing abortions. Fewer doctors doing abortions, cost goes up and butchers like Gosnell look good.

We need abortions to be safe, legal, inexpensive. I'd also prefer they be rare - I would love if every kid was taught about birth control and if no one ever got raped or molested and if no woman ever got pregnant by a man who then deserted her, leaving her with her existing kids and no way to afford the new one. Oh, a perfect world would be wonderful!

But everything the anti-choicers do works against this - they are against teaching birth control in the schools; they are against affordable birth control; they don't even like some of the forms of birth control; they don't support women who have kids with funding for child programs or day care.

Don't blame Gosnell on pro-choicers. He's a direct result of the anti-choice movement that has so restricted the number of abortion providers and that has raised the cost of them.

Standing Ovation!

Spot on!
 
And you, apparently, have been reduced to someone who follows me around like a puppy. Does your family know you are gay?
 
While it's very hard to even read patriot66's post due to lack of punctuation and grammar and poor spelling .... really, I normally don't comment on that, but his post was very bad...but I think I figured out what he was saying....he's blaming Gosnell on pro-choice people. No, he's wrong.

The reason Gosnell got patients is because the harder it is to get an abortion, the more expensive it is and the fewer providers there are; and the more expensive it is the longer it takes women to save the money so their abortions are later in the pregnancy. At that point, they had no option but Gosnell - cheaper, would do later abortions. He was a butcher, but what option did they have?

It's the anti-choice people that have driven so many doctors out of doing abortions. Fewer doctors doing abortions, cost goes up and butchers like Gosnell look good.

We need abortions to be safe, legal, inexpensive. I'd also prefer they be rare - I would love if every kid was taught about birth control and if no one ever got raped or molested and if no woman ever got pregnant by a man who then deserted her, leaving her with her existing kids and no way to afford the new one. Oh, a perfect world would be wonderful!

But everything the anti-choicers do works against this - they are against teaching birth control in the schools; they are against affordable birth control; they don't even like some of the forms of birth control; they don't support women who have kids with funding for child programs or day care.

Don't blame Gosnell on pro-choicers. He's a direct result of the anti-choice movement that has so restricted the number of abortion providers and that has raised the cost of them.

Well isn't that the biggest piece of shit post I have ever read? Almost, howey, poet, even topspinninghead have had worse, but you are right up there. Teaching kids abstinence, and then handing out birth control, is a mixed message and confuses kids. Abortion should be expensive, that way people would take the responsibility for their actions more seriously.
 
Well isn't that the biggest piece of shit post I have ever read? Almost, howey, poet, even topspinninghead have had worse, but you are right up there. Teaching kids abstinence, and then handing out birth control, is a mixed message and confuses kids. Abortion should be expensive, that way people would take the responsibility for their actions more seriously.
I'm not a Puritan Christian crusader, I teach kids to have as much sex as possible!
 
Back
Top