14-Year-Old Pregnant Rape Victim Slut-Shamed in Indiana

tekkychick said:
Exactly. If they are pro-life, then why are they pro-death-penalty? pro-war? and anti-safety net? (which most anti-choice people are).
Click to expand...

1,2, and 4, because we are pro-personal responsibility. No one is pro-war, but if you have to go to war, then accept personal responsibility and get it done.
 
tekkychick said:
Exactly. If they are pro-life, then why are they pro-death-penalty? pro-war? and anti-safety net? (which most anti-choice people are)

I'm pro-life; I'm pro-the woman who is pregnant; she has a life to live, and I'm pro her living her life and having the family size she chooses.
Click to expand...

This is an appeal to emotion and would be the same thing if a pro-lifer said, "If they are against killing the guilty (death penalty) how can they be for killing the innocent (Abortion)?" You'd hear them talk about how you go it "backwards"...

I am anti-killing and ultimately pro-choice. Here is how that works: IMO, we should remove the fetus with a directed attempt to save its life and gestate the progeny outside the womb rather than purposefully killing. Women shouldn't be forced to gestate a child, to be incubators, but neither should the innocent pay with their lives for this choice. Following this process through, this would give women true choice when it finally was fully successful, you would have had the choice of being an incubator or choosing to become a mother through ex-utero gestation.
 
Damocles said:
This is an appeal to emotion and would be the same thing if a pro-lifer said, "If they are against killing the guilty (death penalty) how can they be for killing the innocent (Abortion)?" You'd hear them talk about how you go it "backwards"...

I am anti-killing and ultimately pro-choice. Here is how that works: IMO, we should remove the fetus with a directed attempt to save its life and gestate the progeny outside the womb rather than purposefully killing. Women shouldn't be forced to gestate a child, to be incubators, but neither should the innocent pay with their lives for this choice. Following this process through, this would give women true choice when it finally was fully successful, you would have had the choice of being an incubator or choosing to become a mother through ex-utero gestation.
Click to expand...

That sounds like Brave New World to me, so who takes care and pays for all of these babies that are unwanted?
 
Damocles said:
This is an appeal to emotion and would be the same thing if a pro-lifer said, "If they are against killing the guilty (death penalty) how can they be for killing the innocent (Abortion)?" You'd hear them talk about how you go it "backwards"...

I am anti-killing and ultimately pro-choice. Here is how that works: IMO, we should remove the fetus with a directed attempt to save its life and gestate the progeny outside the womb rather than purposefully killing. Women shouldn't be forced to gestate a child, to be incubators, but neither should the innocent pay with their lives for this choice. Following this process through, this would give women true choice when it finally was fully successful, you would have had the choice of being an incubator or choosing to become a mother through ex-utero gestation.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity (along with the question of who then takes care of all those kids) - what would you do with all the fertilized eggs that have resulted from IVF and are in cold storage? Would you also incubate those somehow? and again - who will raise them all?
 
Socrtease said:
Give me a fucking break. As soon as the Gosnell case hit the wire, you guys were painting the entire pro-choice movement and clinics with the big broad Gosnell brush. Sauce for the goose my friend.
Click to expand...

Trying to paint me in with others is simply more nonsense. When you wish to be honest about what i have said, then we can discuss further
 
Jarod said:
Its more accurate than using the term "pro-abortion".
Click to expand...

No, it is not. Pro-abortion refers to a persons position on the legality of abortions in general. The anti- lifers like darla simply wish to dehumanize the human progeny so they can justify killing them when rape is not the cause or the womans life is not in danger.
 
Darla said:
No, it's not. It's refusing to allow the anti-choicers to set the narrative, which is what they did with their bullshit "pro-life" meme. If he is pro-life, then I am anti-life. Meanwhile, I am against wars, and do not support the bombings of actual living children. He and all the rest of them (most of the rest of them) are all pro-war. They are mostly all against food stamps, and other programs that help alleviate the suffering of children living in poverty. I am not anti-life. They are not pro-life.

Fucking period. And you better believe I insist on taking that language back.

Anti-choice. Forced-birthers. But pro-life? BULLSHIT.
Click to expand...

Lmao... By the same token, i am for all sorts of choices.

The right to choose to have sex. The right to choose whether or not to use protection. Plus a billion other 'choices'.

Your nonsense about not caring for those already born is simply shit u pulled from your ass.
 
tekkychick said:
Exactly. If they are pro-life, then why are they pro-death-penalty? pro-war? and anti-safety net? (which most anti-choice people are)

I'm pro-life; I'm pro-the woman who is pregnant; she has a life to live, and I'm pro her living her life and having the family size she chooses.
Click to expand...

Typical nonsense. Their is a difference in protecting an innocent life and protecting that of someone like dahmer. Which one do you fight to protect and which do you feel is ok to kill?
 
Socrtease said:
First off, people who are brain dead still have a heartbeat. That does not make them "alive" and our laws allow for the end of artificial life support when that is the case. Second, The 14th amendment says Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.[/QUOTE]

So I highlighted what ruins your argument, and is the mother artificial life support, nope, we are not talking about braindead either
Click to expand...
 
Socrtease said:
Give me a fucking break. As soon as the Gosnell case hit the wire, you guys were painting the entire pro-choice movement and clinics with the big broad Gosnell brush. Sauce for the goose my friend.
Click to expand...

That is because the libiots insisted abortion was done to make women stop going to back alley abortion Doctors, even inflated the numbers of so called back alley abortions in the roe v wade case to legalize baby slaughter, now the back alley butchering is still going on so now what do away with pregnancy. You libiots are insufferable .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top