10 Ways the Marxist Left Manipulates Words to change history and compel behavior

Misunderstanding on your part. He was not arrested for his speech but for conspiracy to overturn the election. The speech was merely evidence of the plot.

There was no plot. He was indicted, not arrested. He is being charged based on his speech. Nothing more, nothing less. If you had a brain, you could comprehend the OBVIOUS.

You voted for Biden didn't you? Avid MSNBC viewer no doubt too.

Claiming he is being prosecuted for "speech" is one of the wilder claims made by MAGA supporters. They seem willing to believe anything the PR people can invent.

It is exactly what is happening here. Claiming he isn't is one of the dumber Biden voter memes.

You might want to READ the actual indictment for a better understanding of what is happening.
 
An example of manipulating language? How about calling the left Marxist? The right misuses terms over and over when describing the Dems, who are simply acting as a normal American political party.
 
Not yet. Wait until the some of the indictments result in guilty verdicts. Then there will be an illegal conspiracy; much like the January 6 convictions for seditious conspiracy.

Any guilty verdicts by prejudiced juries will be reversed on appeal. ALL of these cases should have been thrown out by these leftist jurists on the merits. These are what are known as meritless charges.

There was no conspiracy. Even a President has a right to challenge election outcomes and demand an accounting. Only in a Fascistic autocratic third world shit hole do ex-Presidents get attacked on such specious grounds.

Biden voter, right? MSNBC viewer no doubt.
 
There was no plot. He was indicted, not arrested. He is being charged based on his speech. Nothing more, nothing less. If you had a brain, you could comprehend the OBVIOUS.

You voted for Biden didn't you? Avid MSNBC viewer no doubt too.

It is exactly what is happening here. Claiming he isn't is one of the dumber Biden voter memes.

You might want to READ the actual indictment for a better understanding of what is happening.

If you think Trump is being arrested for his speech you obviously have not read the indictments.

Plotting to block an election, present illegitimate electors, persuade states to change election results, pressure on the VP to violate the Constitution, etc. has nothing to do with free speech.

No, I didn't vote for Biden. That would be as stupid as voting for Trump.
 
Any guilty verdicts by prejudiced juries will be reversed on appeal. ALL of these cases should have been thrown out by these leftist jurists on the merits. These are what are known as meritless charges.

There was no conspiracy. Even a President has a right to challenge election outcomes and demand an accounting. Only in a Fascistic autocratic third world shit hole do ex-Presidents get attacked on such specious grounds.

Biden voter, right? MSNBC viewer no doubt.

The president has a right to legally challenge the election outcome. That was being done in Congress when the MAGA mob became violent and stopped the proceeding. Trump did challenge the election in court but none of his cases presented any evidence (only accusations) so they all failed.

No MSNBC. Only uninformed idiots get their news from television (MSNBC, Fox, Newsmax) or other partisan news sources.
 
Any guilty verdicts by prejudiced juries will be reversed on appeal. ALL of these cases should have been thrown out by these leftist jurists on the merits. These are what are known as meritless charges.

In other words, if you lose an election or trial it was rigged. Following Trump's line 100%.

They have not even started jury selection. How do you know it will be prejudiced? If the courts do not overturn the conviction then you will claim those courts were biased. Poor little victim.
 
The president has a right to legally challenge the election outcome. That was being done in Congress when the MAGA mob became violent and stopped the proceeding. Trump did challenge the election in court but none of his cases presented any evidence (only accusations) so they all failed.

No MSNBC. Only uninformed idiots get their news from television (MSNBC, Fox, Newsmax) or other partisan news sources.

The challenges in court didn't fail. They were never allowed to go anywhere by the same jurists who legislated from their benches.

There was no violent MAGA mob. That's another moronic MSNBC/DNC narrative. A few in a massive crowd broke some windows. The majority were very peaceful and allowed into the building by Capitol police. None of whom, the police, were admonished or fired.

Some of the violence was provoked by the Capitol police. The truth and the facts will be exposed some day. But not as long as autoicratic Democrats control the White House and Senate.
 
The Biden administration through its intelligence agencies and departments of State, Health, and Education--promote a certain acceptable word speak and ideology. They work hand in hand with social media giants and a compliant liberal media to force this tyrannical suppression of speech.

Below are 10 ways in which the Marxists and Leftists have changed the meaning of words in America today:

1.) Keeping pornography out of school is redefined as "book banning."

2.) Illegal aliens are redefined as "asylum-seekers."

3.) Opposing the genital mutilation of minors is redefined as opposing healthcare for trans kids and supporting LGBTQ+ legislation.

4.) Opposing the idea of having female athletes overpowered by biological male competitors is redefined as discriminating against trans athletes.

5.) Being opposed to a regulation requiring mortgage applicants with good credit scores subsidizing those with bad scores is being against efforts
to bolster home-ownership for the disadvantaged.

6.) Criticizing the Los Angeles Dodgers for giving an award to a drag queen company that mocks the crucified Jesus Christ, nuns, and Catholics is
redefined as being intolerant to gays.

7.) Parents who complain about their white children being taught they are racist and Black children being taught they are helpless victims are
redefined as being domestic terrorists.

8.) Pedophiles are redefined as "people attracted to minors."

9.) A mother is redefined as a "birthing person."

10.) A girl is redefined as "assigned female at birth."


If you scoffed at ever believing you could succumb to the state's will by saying two plus two equals five, ask yourself if you are now unwittingly
repeating any of the left's new acceptable word speak listed above.

More than pretty creepy, isn't it?


Steve Levy, President of Common Sense Strategies

Your president of Common Sense Strategies needs to bone up on his common sense, in this case keeping his ideology out of word definitions.

Take his first three:


1.) Banning books from libraries because of passages that have non lurid references to sex, and without regard to literary or educational value, is the obscenity here.

2.) "Illegal aliens" often but not always are "asylum seekers" and accurately described as such. These are different terms with different meanings.

3.) Gender sex change surgery is mislabeled "genital mutilation" by ideologues who tar it with the practice in some societies that forcibly mutilate young girls, destroying their sexual lives for good.

The others are equally stupid.
 
The challenges in court didn't fail. They were never allowed to go anywhere by the same jurists who legislated from their benches.

They failed because the plaintiffs did not present any evidence to support their case.

It had nothing to do with biased judges. If any judge allowed a case in court with no evidence they should be removed.

I suggest you read some of those cases to see the real problem. The plaintiffs had no evidence of voter fraud--they only have the allegations which have easily been proven false. Now, even Rudy has admitted his claims about the fraudulent ballot counters in Atlanta were lies.

Even Republicans seeking evidence to determine if they believed the fraud charges could not get evidence. Senators Bill Lee and Lindsey Graham asked for a presentation of the information. They sent Rudy to talk to them who just repeated the same false accusations. Mark Meadows said his son could find no "dead" voters and Tucker Carlson said he stated he hated Trump because they were supposed to supply him a list of dead voters which never appeared.
 
Take his first three:

1.) Banning books from libraries because of passages that have non lurid references to sex, and without regard to literary or educational value, is the obscenity here.

That is a moronic lie. These books are very lurid with lurid illustrations. If you thought for yourself and did even a modicum of research you would know this.

We used to have laws against porn for minors. These days, Democrats want us to celebrate it. Moronic.

2.) "Illegal aliens" often but not always are "asylum seekers" and accurately described as such. These are different terms with different meanings.

It doesn't matter what leftist morons like you want to call them. There is a LEGAL process for asylum seekers. If you weren't a dishonest uneducated lying partisan hack, you would know the difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL.

3.) Gender sex change surgery is mislabeled "genital mutilation" by ideologues who tar it with the practice in some societies that forcibly mutilate young girls, destroying their sexual lives for good.

Mutilating children used to be illegal. Now, the Democratic Party of repugnant ideologues want to destroy them permanently by using euphemisms like "gender transition." It's moronic in that you cannot change your gender. That is determined at birth. The notion that you can change gender is moronic and can only be professed by lying morons intent on destroying childhood.

These mutilations serve to increase suicide rates rather than abate them. That's a scientific FACT.

The desire to change your gender is a sign of mental illness and requires treatment, not permanent mutilation.

The others are equally stupid.

You being the definition of stupid.
 
When was evidence heard dipshit? SOURCE!

You can't present evidence when you have none to present. If they had any evidence they could have presented it in court.

Again. Read some of these cases. Read the indictments. Knowledge will explain a lot. But I know you won't know about anything unless it is on TV news.
 
That is a moronic lie. These books are very lurid with lurid illustrations. If you thought for yourself and did even a modicum of research you would know this.

We used to have laws against porn for minors. These days, Democrats want us to celebrate it. Moronic.



It doesn't matter what leftist morons like you want to call them. There is a LEGAL process for asylum seekers. If you weren't a dishonest uneducated lying partisan hack, you would know the difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL.



Mutilating children used to be illegal. Now, the Democratic Party of repugnant ideologues want to destroy them permanently by using euphemisms like "gender transition." It's moronic in that you cannot change your gender. That is determined at birth. The notion that you can change gender is moronic and can only be professed by lying morons intent on destroying childhood.

These mutilations serve to increase suicide rates rather than abate them. That's a scientific FACT.

The desire to change your gender is a sign of mental illness and requires treatment, not permanent mutilation.



You being the definition of stupid.

Because something is open and candid doesn't make it lurid but book banners always see it that way, which says more about them than the books. Books have been wrongly banned as "pornographic" at least since Lady Chatterly's Lover in the 1920's. The difference now is just the intensity of the banning efforts. Probably the most notorious of the current crop of feared books is Gender Queer. It is graphic but not lurid, and it is plain stupid to think anything useful is done by shielding it from the eyes of teenagers.

Your other criticisms are not responsive, which is fine. I wouldn't expect them to be.
 
Misunderstanding on your part. He was not arrested for his speech but for conspiracy to overturn the election.
There was no election in 2020, Dim. Conspiracy is not illegal. The Democrat party is a conspiracy.
The speech was merely evidence of the plot.
What 'plot'? A speech is not illegal.
Claiming he is being prosecuted for "speech" is one of the wilder claims made by MAGA supporters.
WRONG. It is exactly what he is being prosecuted for!
They seem willing to believe anything the PR people can invent.
Trump didn't make any such statement. DEMOCRATS DID!
 
Not yet. Wait until the some of the indictments result in guilty verdicts. Then there will be an illegal conspiracy; much like the January 6 convictions for seditious conspiracy.

Conspiracy is not illegal, Dim. Trump didn't organize the riots. DEMOCRATS DID (specifically Pelosi).
 
There was no election in 2020, Dim. Conspiracy is not illegal. The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

What 'plot'? A speech is not illegal.

WRONG. It is exactly what he is being prosecuted for!

Trump didn't make any such statement. DEMOCRATS DID!

Wrong on all points no matter how many times you repeat them.
 
An example of manipulating language? How about calling the left Marxist?

How about it? You ARE Marxists. No manipulation of anything here. Democrats are socialists, and agree with the writings of Karl Marx. You support communism. You support fascism. You would bring back slavery if you could get away with it.
 
Back
Top