10 Ways the Marxist Left Manipulates Words to change history and compel behavior

[Into the Night]

I actually see possible validity in maybe forty or fifty-percent of that about which the above idiot is trying to discuss.

I'm an "unwoke" hard left Democrat, after all.

Still, the right's penchant for using recognizable English words in a unique order never before seen,
all the while creating unique new meanings for the words themselves,
is too off-putting for me to ever recognize even the slightest modicum of sense
in anything that any of them try to write or say.

LIF. Grow up.

 

[Into the Night]

You are nuts.

YOU are the one that wants censorship, Creep Wannabe.

 

[Into the Night]

What a twisted world you live in

These are redefinitions used by YOU, Gunk.

 

[Flash]

Government strongly endorsed it dimwit. Now, they are arresting Trump for challenging an election outcome. Nothing screams suppression louder.

Do you do everything government "endorses"? Endorsing something is not the same as government suppression of free speech.

Many people have challenged election outcomes using legal means. When illegal conspiracies are used to question an election is when the problem begins. His legal means flopped when the House failed to support challenges and his legal cases flopped when they presented no evidence to support the claims.

Legal means do not include phony slates of electors, claiming they observed cheating which Rudy later admitted was a lie, pressuring election officials to find votes, lying to the nation that cheating occurred when none existed, and urging protesters to attack the Capitol.

Anybody who believed those lies obviously just believed the accusations without bothering to confirm anything unless they think watching YouTube videos and social media is "research."

 

[Into the Night]

Just as soon as you prove it was not banned.

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. The burden is on YOU, Jackass. Point to the directive or law in Florida that bans 'To Kill a Mockingbird'.

 

[Flash]

There is no state law that says a private company cannot use its funds to pay someone for an NDA. Please find it for me, because even that criminal loving moron Bragg can't find it.

It is called embezzlement. A person cannot take money from a company and use it for personal benefit.

 

[Into the Night]

You need to go gargle with some TY-D-BOL!

And here- Use one of these!

Somebody's got to clean up Democrat shit.

 

[Into the Night]

... asylum seekers ... immigrants ... what "we" once were ... "melting pot" ... diversity, equity, inclusion ...

and that's only when "those people" stay "over there", of course...

Makes your Lispy Lefty List rather long and complicated, doesn't it?

 

[Into the Night]

Strange wording. You will admit? It is a preposterous claim with a horrible unthinking right-wing slant. You do not know enough to understand why you are so wrong. You are a believer. One of low level.

It's wording that YOU use, Nordbutt. Don't try to deny your own posts!

 

[Flash]

WRONG; they are attempting to SUPRESS his speech by arresting him. DUH!

If they simply "attempted" to suppress his speech but did not suppress it, his speech was not restricted. None of his speech was restricted.

This is based on the stupid conspiracy theory that the justice system is picking on Trump and he has committed no crimes. He must be a victim of a rigged system.

That is the same claim by every convicted criminal in prison.

 

[Into the Night]

Do you do everything government "endorses"? Endorsing something is not the same as government suppression of free speech.

In this case, it is.

Many people have challenged election outcomes using legal means. When illegal conspiracies

Conspiracies are not illegal. The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

are used to question an election is when the problem begins.

It is not illegal to question an election. It is not illegal for a conspiracy to question an election.

His legal means flopped when the House failed to support challenges and his legal cases flopped when they presented no evidence to support the claims.

No opportunity was provided to present any evidence, Dimwit. You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just go away. It's there. I have shown some of it to you. Democrats CONTINUE to cheat. The 2020 and 2022 elections faulted because of it. You can't make the judgement by people of that evidence just disappear either, Dimwit.

Legal means do not include phony slates of electors,

No such thing, Dimwit.

claiming they observed cheating

There was cheating. I have already shown you evidence of election fraud by Democrats.

which Rudy later admitted was a lie,

Irrelevant.

pressuring election officials to find votes,

Not illegal.

lying to the nation that cheating occurred when none existed,

Not illegal. Evidence does exist anyway.

and urging protesters to attack the Capitol.

DEMOCRATS did that. You can trace that right back to Pelosi.

Anybody who believed those lies obviously just believed the accusations without bothering to confirm anything

You are describing yourself.

unless they think watching YouTube videos and social media is "research."

You are describing yourself.

 

[Into the Night]

It is called embezzlement. A person cannot take money from a company and use it for personal benefit.

Yes they can. It's called a 'paycheck'.

 

[Into the Night]

If they simply "attempted" to suppress his speech but did not suppress it, his speech was not restricted. None of his speech was restricted.

Blatant lie.

This is based on the stupid conspiracy theory that the justice system is picking on Trump and he has committed no crimes.

Not a conspiracy theory. Conspiracies are not theories. The DEMOCRATS are using the 'justice system' to pick on Trump. He has committed no crime.

He must be a victim of a rigged system.

He is, just as voters are.

That is the same claim by every convicted criminal in prison.

Blatant lie. Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for every prisoner. Attempted proof by association.

 

[BidenPresident]

YOU are the one that wants censorship, Creep Wannabe.

I never said anything about censorship you stupid asshole.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

The Biden administration through its intelligence agencies and departments of State, Health, and Education--promote a certain acceptable word speak and ideology. They work hand in hand with social media giants and a compliant liberal media to force this tyrannical suppression of speech.

Below are 10 ways in which the Marxists and Leftists have changed the meaning of words in America today:

1.) Keeping pornography out of school is redefined as "book banning."

2.) Illegal aliens are redefined as "asylum-seekers."

3.) Opposing the genital mutilation of minors is redefined as opposing healthcare for trans kids and supporting LGBTQ+ legislation.

4.) Opposing the idea of having female athletes overpowered by biological male competitors is redefined as discriminating against trans athletes.

5.) Being opposed to a regulation requiring mortgage applicants with good credit scores subsidizing those with bad scores is being against efforts
to bolster home-ownership for the disadvantaged.

6.) Criticizing the Los Angeles Dodgers for giving an award to a drag queen company that mocks the crucified Jesus Christ, nuns, and Catholics is
redefined as being intolerant to gays.

7.) Parents who complain about their white children being taught they are racist and Black children being taught they are helpless victims are
redefined as being domestic terrorists.

8.) Pedophiles are redefined as "people attracted to minors."

9.) A mother is redefined as a "birthing person."

10.) A girl is redefined as "assigned female at birth."


If you scoffed at ever believing you could succumb to the state's will by saying two plus two equals five, ask yourself if you are now unwittingly
repeating any of the left's new acceptable word speak listed above.

More than pretty creepy, isn't it?


Steve Levy, President of Common Sense Strategies

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Flash]

Yes they can. It's called a 'paycheck'.

That defense will really go over. "I embezzled money from the company funds for personal benefit, but ir was just my 'paycheck.'

Wonder if Bernie Maydoff used that defense?

 

[Flash]

The DEMOCRATS are using the 'justice system' to pick on Trump. He has committed no crime.

What you mean is that you don't want to believe he has committed any crimes.

Four grand juries disagree with you. They are the ones who heard the facts, were informed about the law, and decided there was enough evidence for him to stand trial on about 100 indictments.

You have no clue about the charges against him, the evidence to support those charges, or the elements of the law in those indictments.

You had made up your mind on this issue four years ago because you are not capable of admitting responsibility.

"I'm a victim" and the "Democrats did it all" is a juvenile explanation.

 

[Yakuda]

The Sock has lately been claiming that anything that he disagrees with 'violates the forum rules'. *yawn*

that schtick is getting tiresome

 

[Into the Night]

It was NEVER banned. He's lying as usual.

It has been banned before, but not by Florida at the moment. Usually the ones banning it were the Democrats, since it depicts the ugliness of their racism.

 

[Into the Night]

you need to be killed

War mongering.