another dishonest statement from romney

ZappasGuitar said:
The only thing the truth hurts is your already suspect "honesty".

This thread is just the latest example of how you are incapable of admitting when you are wrong.
Click to expand...

where was i was wrong? i've admitted i'm wrong numerous times, in fact, i did so earlier today with dung. why you have to constantly lie about me is disturbing.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
It doesn't surprise you, does it?

Yurt will buy into anything as long as it comes from someone with an "R" after their name.
Click to expand...

seriously, it is like you love lying and are here solely to lie about people. i just created a thread today disagreeing with romney's stance on gay marriage....yeah...this means i buy into anything if it comes from a republican. what a loser zappa....nice one...LOL
 
Yurt said:
seriously, it is like you love lying and are here solely to lie about people. i just created a thread today disagreeing with romney's stance on gay marriage....
Click to expand...

Do you have any idea how transparent that stuff is?

It's basically a non-issue for a Presidential candidate, because there will never be any kind of constitutional action on gay marriage. It's low-hanging fruit for hacks like you to try to claim any "independence."

On another thread, you've been apologizing for Romney's complete dishonesty about the auto bailouts ad nauseum. You're a GOP apologist, and - as I said - you'd vote for Romney a million times if you could.
 
Onceler said:
Do you have any idea how transparent that stuff is?

It's basically a non-issue for a Presidential candidate, because there will never be any kind of constitutional action on gay marriage. It's low-hanging fruit for hacks like you to try to claim any "independence."

On another thread, you've been apologizing for Romney's complete dishonesty about the auto bailouts ad nauseum. You're a GOP apologist, and - as I said - you'd vote for Romney a million times if you could.
Click to expand...


I am constantly amazed at how Yurt assumes everyone here is just naive beyond belief.

He's STILL trying to claim that the GOP Chairman of the hearings on contraception didn't refuse to allow women to testify during the hearings...this despite the fact that literally a dozen different news outlets reported it when it happened.
 
Onceler said:
Do you have any idea how transparent that stuff is?

It's basically a non-issue for a Presidential candidate, because there will never be any kind of constitutional action on gay marriage. It's low-hanging fruit for hacks like you to try to claim any "independence."

On another thread, you've been apologizing for Romney's complete dishonesty about the auto bailouts ad nauseum. You're a GOP apologist, and - as I said - you'd vote for Romney a million times if you could.
Click to expand...

this is truly hilarious and shows just how ridiculous your thinking is. the claim is that i always support something republican. you've made the claim that i support all republicans. then of course you back peddled when i gave you republicans i don't support. now, i give just one example of something i don't support and you of course belittle it.

sorry onceler, it is a huge issue in this country. there is nothing transparent about not supporting romney over this. you can't make the ludicrous claim that someone supports anything so long as an (r) is in front of the name and then when that person doesn't, you can't belittle it. that is completely dishonest.

the other thread has nothing to do with apologizing. you once again dishonestly misrepresent my stance. i said he was wrong for taking the credit like he did....yeah...real apologism there....LOL. you're senile.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I am constantly amazed at how Yurt assumes everyone here is just naive beyond belief.

He's STILL trying to claim that the GOP Chairman of the hearings on contraception didn't refuse to allow women to testify during the hearings...this despite the fact that literally a dozen different news outlets reported it when it happened.
Click to expand...

LOOOOL....lefty news outlets said it....so it must be true.....

you still can't find another women who wasn't allowed to testify can you? how sad for you.
 
if it is such a non-issue....why did obama do a major interview over change in his stance? why has it made waves over the news today? oh yeah....because it is a big issue to many people.

lmao...you're not very astute onceler...
 
Yurt said:
this is truly hilarious and shows just how ridiculous your thinking is. the claim is that i always support something republican. you've made the claim that i support all republicans. then of course you back peddled when i gave you republicans i don't support. now, i give just one example of something i don't support and you of course belittle it.

sorry onceler, it is a huge issue in this country. there is nothing transparent about not supporting romney over this. you can't make the ludicrous claim that someone supports anything so long as an (r) is in front of the name and then when that person doesn't, you can't belittle it. that is completely dishonest.

the other thread has nothing to do with apologizing. you once again dishonestly misrepresent my stance. i said he was wrong for taking the credit like he did....yeah...real apologism there....LOL. you're senile.
Click to expand...

You said he wasn't being dishonest. You said his statement was "actually true."

You really don't realize what you say.
 
Yurt said:
if it is such a non-issue....why did obama do a major interview over change in his stance? why has it made waves over the news today? oh yeah....because it is a big issue to many people.

lmao...you're not very astute onceler...
Click to expand...

It's a safe issue for hacks to play independence off of. It's something Presidents have no power over, whatsoever.

Like I said, it's very transparent to anyone reading it.
 
you're hilarious. you will dig your heels in and belittle anything because it proves you wrong.

what is further hilarious, is that you know very well that isn't the only reason i consider myself independent. but go ahead and follow zappa's lead and lie about my positions. you're very good at it..

now...as to safe position, preposterous. it is very contentious decision. if it is so safe...why did obama not support it his first run at office? the fact is...it is not a safe issue. society is evenly split over it. obama could lose votes for it, he may gain some, but he is in danger of losing many votes. to claim it is safe shows how truly naive you are.
 
Onceler said:
You said he wasn't being dishonest. You said his statement was "actually true."

You really don't realize what you say.
Click to expand...

i've explained this to you more than once. what part didn't you understand? or are you now just going to dishonestly misrepresent what i said, over and over...? you had to dishonestly leave out a portion of my post to make your point. if i don't know what i said....you wouldn't have to lie about what i said.

let me help you out one more time:

1. i said he was wrong about the credit.

2. i said his statement that his ideas were used are true. that is the part about "dishonest".

hopefully your feeble mind can finally accept this and move on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top