One world currency

W

wiseones2cents

Verified User
If the entire globe had a one world currency made interest free? Would the world be a better place to live? No more charity would be needed. No more taxes. NO more poverty. No more slavery and exploitation of the poor( A trait of capitalism).

What are your thoughts?

Does the Bible support Capitalism or Socialism?

Why is charity needed in the first place? Is it not due to greed?

The Republicans brag about all their charity. Though did not the Pharisees do the same thing?

They say the Pharisees also gave more then everyone else. They were also stealing more then everyone else. Charities are a big joke in America. They say around 30% of donations(at the most) go towards charity and the rest is all over head. It is indeed a good racket for the organizers.

Heck even the Mafia donates to charity! Though how many lives were ruined to acheive that money is well documented. As is the money donated by the wealthy from slavery.


What else does Scripture tell us about the world?

Doesn't GOD and Scripture tell us the world is ruled by satan? The system of things(Including Capitalism) Is a system of satan? Doesn't Scripture tell us satan and his demons disguise themselves as angels of light(ministers)? You cannot see the forester for the trees, but I can see. It has been given to me to see.

Why do republicans put their trust in men(men of wealth to be precise) and in wealth? Both of which are unkosher (so to speak) to GOD.

Many people think that what we are experiencing today in the workplace is "great". Where we can go from ob to job. Is it great?

That's funny! I know SOOO many people that hate their jobs and are stuck at their jobs because they cant find better. Only the guys that get payed big money to sit around in suits and the girls that are sleeping with their bosses making stupid money are the ones that are happy.

Back in the day we had job security. You would get a job and die at the job. Now you go through MANY jobs(not by choice) before you die. I prefer job security. Had I had job security? My life would have been much different today. Though destiny has brought me here and I do not plan to go down without a fight. I wil fight for my rights and the rights of every human being.

Furthermore? Jesus said that the Pharisees had CORRUPTED the Jewish way. That is why Jesus was sent. To put them back on the path. The Pharisees were prosperity preachers(for profit), many were unfaithful, corrupt, deceivers. And they had warped the scriptures and turned religion into a profit making scheme.

Also Jesus told all the rich to give their wealth to the poor and the Disciples lived in a SOCIALIST SOCIETY! Sorry people, if you believe otherwise? You have been indoctrinated by those same Pharisees.

People also talk about OT laws that support capitalism in the sense that it mentions a borrower and a lender. Though Usery was unkosher. GOD also put up with divorce even though it was not HIS way. Why? Because of the hardness of the hearts of the people.

The Bible also supported slavery. Today we know it is unkosher. You have to understand that the people of old had different sentimentalities. Therefore applying those laws and verses to today's evolved society would be unproductive. At least to the common man. The rich would still love us to be their perpetual slaves.
 
I have to go but I will back back to hear your thoughts. Endless funds equals endless research to advance medicine, technology, NASA and everything else.

Oh but the rich would never agree to this, because that would mean the end to poverty and the end of them exploiting the poor.

I was talking with a guy that has the inside scoop on how the world is run economically. And he stated that the rich are good at rotating their money. Which means whenever they give with one hand, that are taking from you in another. Doesn't that sound like the government too?
 
"Today we know that it is unkosher"

I can't help laughing. I have never heard of slavery described in quite that way? I can't help picturing a plantation owner turning to a friend and asking "but is it Kosher?" WTF?
 
Darla said:
"Today we know that it is unkosher"

I can't help laughing. I have never heard of slavery described in quite that way? I can't help picturing a plantation owner turning to a friend and asking "but is it Kosher?" WTF?
Click to expand...

They would turn to the Plantation owner and say what would Jesus do.lol

Do you not get the gist of what I am saying? Just because certain practices were acceptable in the old days, doesn't mean they would be acceptable in today's evolved society. Therefore saying well it is written in Scripture(which is a tactic used by some), it doesn't make it a law written in stone. Heck they used to sacrifice doves to remove sin.lol
 
wiseones2cents said:
They would turn to the Plantation owner and say what would Jesus do.lol

Do you not get the gist of what I am saying? Just because certain practices were acceptable in the old days, doesn't mean they would be acceptable in today's evolved society. Therefore saying well it is written in Scripture(which is a tactic used by some), it doesn't make it a law written in stone. Heck they used to sacrifice doves to remove sin.lol
Click to expand...

Yes I get what you are saying and I don't believe in Scripture and even for people who do believe, it's incredibly stupid to pretend that morals haven't changed since then.
 
Darla said:
Yes I get what you are saying and I don't believe in Scripture and even for people who do believe, it's incredibly stupid to pretend that morals haven't changed since then.
Click to expand...

Its not that morals have changed. Our primitive nature is more disciplined. We no longer stone people for commiting adultery, or cut off their hands for stealing. More compassion is given.
We as a society are more intelligent, more civilized, more evolved, understand better the concepts of human nature. Though in primitive times, men were more primitive less evolved less educated and more serious punishments were required to keep them civilized. If harsh punishment wasn't dished out, we may have never evolved to this stage but today, there is no need for harsh punishment. This is just one of the things we as a civilized society have matured.

Thererfore when the wealthy people and pharisees state, "well the Bible talks about being slave to the lender"(a capitalist concept), does not mean that this concept should be recognized for ever. And the world should be perpetually in debt to creditors.

The Christians are waiting for Jesus to return and this is why they do not rise up(though eventually they get tired of waiting and rise up/after much unnecessary suffering that is). Why aren't the atheists rising up?
 
wiseones2cents said:
Its not that morals have changed. Our primitive nature is more disciplined. We no longer stone people for commiting adultery, or cut off their hands for stealing. More compassion is given.
We as a society are more intelligent, more civilized, more evolved, understand better the concepts of human nature. Though in primitive times, men were more primitive less evolved less educated and more serious punishments were required to keep them civilized. If harsh punishment wasn't dished out, we may have never evolved to this stage but today, there is no need for harsh punishment. This is just one of the things we as a civilized society have matured.

Thererfore when the wealthy people and pharisees state, "well the Bible talks about being slave to the lender"(a capitalist concept), does not mean that this concept should be recognized for ever. And the world should be perpetually in debt to creditors.

The Christians are waiting for Jesus to return and this is why they do not rise up(though eventually they get tired of waiting and rise up/after much unnecessary suffering that is). Why aren't the atheists rising up?
Click to expand...

Oh wait. The atheists are, with their gay parades and protest and slut walks. Everyone protests for their rights but the poor. Wonder why that is?
 
wiseones2cents said:
They would turn to the Plantation owner and say what would Jesus do.lol

Do you not get the gist of what I am saying? Just because certain practices were acceptable in the old days, doesn't mean they would be acceptable in today's evolved society. Therefore saying well it is written in Scripture(which is a tactic used by some), it doesn't make it a law written in stone. Heck they used to sacrifice doves to remove sin.lol
Click to expand...
this is basically the same argument that people use to promote a 'living' constitution, which is the death knell for the constitution. If that is what you wish, expect it to be fought against, and violently.
 
Also. Right now the system is rigged to exploit poverty via competitive currencies and ALL countries are still slave to capitalist debt of which the bulk is INTEREST!

Lets say I took over Canada. I'd start making my own currency which is the soverign right of any country though no longer recognized because the world is slave to a monopoly of global creditors. Canada being self sufficient would never need to trade with any country. And it would not matter much if their currency became worthless outside the county. Though then I'd go to poor countries and say. Would you like to join Canada? I will lift you out of poverty and free you from slavery. The only problem is that the people that have them enslaved(global creditors) would wage war to get it back. Though with my endless money supply, I would build the most powerful military this world has seen.

I would tell the countries, all you have to do is rise up against your leader which obviously would not want to lose their priviledged lives via exploiting the poor. And I would end poverty in their country. Supply machinery, technology and everything else!

Do you see where I am getting at? Eventually every poor nation or poor people would beg to be a part of my country and have my currency.
 
Ultimatly one world currency and one world government (with shared federalist powers) will be a great thing. We are not ready for it yet, but as any student of history would be remiss not to admit, its the unrelenting path civilization has been blazing for over 2000 years. The advent of the United States, and the EU are the prime examples. Also consider NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Asian equivelent, the United Nations and NATO.

One day, the USA, the EU and maybe some other federations, as of yet unformed, will join in agreements leading to the next step in global government. There will still be local governments, but some shared powers and some non-shared powers will be given to the larger good.
 
There were once villages, then cities, then city states, then states, then united states forming nations... whats next?
 
wiseones2cents said:
Are you saying that constitional laws should be written in stone?
Click to expand...
i'm saying the constitution is a legal document, therefore it should be adhered to as such. Not 'interpreted according to the times that we live in'. If people support the living constitution theory, all they are doing is giving the government a foot in the door to tyranny.
 
Smarterthan\\(())// said:
i'm saying the constitution is a legal document, therefore it should be adhered to as such. Not 'interpreted according to the times that we live in'. If people support the living constitution theory, all they are doing is giving the government a foot in the door to tyranny.
Click to expand...

If we do not allow for a "living document" whose interpertation is open to very slow change, we will have a revolution and new constitution every 75 to 200 years. Just look to the French for an example. Or Germany, they have had how many governments in the last 100 years?
 
wiseones2cents said:
Also. Right now the system is rigged to exploit poverty via competitive currencies and ALL countries are still slave to capitalist debt of which the bulk is INTEREST!

Lets say I took over Canada. I'd start making my own currency which is the soverign right of any country though no longer recognized because the world is slave to a monopoly of global creditors. Canada being self sufficient would never need to trade with any country. And it would not matter much if their currency became worthless outside the county. Though then I'd go to poor countries and say. Would you like to join Canada? I will lift you out of poverty and free you from slavery. The only problem is that the people that have them enslaved(global creditors) would wage war to get it back. Though with my endless money supply, I would build the most powerful military this world has seen.

I would tell the countries, all you have to do is rise up against your leader which obviously would not want to lose their priviledged lives via exploiting the poor. And I would end poverty in their country. Supply machinery, technology and everything else!

Do you see where I am getting at? Eventually every poor nation or poor people would beg to be a part of my country and have my currency.
Click to expand...
how do you base your currency value? how is it going to retain it's value? right now currency is based on gold, which is why you and I are not allowed to possess it. if paper currency is not based upon any real tangible item of value, it becomes worthless and inflation would run your country in to bankruptcy.
 
Jarod said:
Ultimatly one world currency and one world government (with shared federalist powers) will be a great thing. We are not ready for it yet, but as any student of history would be remiss not to admit, its the unrelenting path civilization has been blazing for over 2000 years. The advent of the United States, and the EU are the prime examples. Also consider NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Asian equivelent, the United Nations and NATO.

One day, the USA, the EU and maybe some other federations, as of yet unformed, will join in agreements leading to the next step in global government. There will still be local governments, but some shared powers and some non-shared powers will be given to the larger good.
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
There were once villages, then cities, then city states, then states, then united states forming nations... whats next?
Click to expand...
for someone who's supposed to be intelligent, you obviously haven't learned anything from history. even recent history.
 
Some day 2 cents worth of shit in a sock will come to realize there is no free lunch, and give up this fantasy of endless free money and stop making moronic threads about it.
 
Jarod said:
If we do not allow for a "living document" whose interpertation is open to very slow change, we will have a revolution and new constitution every 75 to 200 years.
Click to expand...
this is pure speculation.

Jarod said:
Just look to the French for an example. Or Germany, they have had how many governments in the last 100 years?
Click to expand...
and you're basing their failure upon a legal document?

The reason the constitution is written to make change slow is so that it can't be changed by the knee jerk reactionaries based on fear or anger. This is why the living constitution theory was created, in order to let written laws change the interpretation to give the knee jerkers what they want.
 
Jarod said:
Ultimatly one world currency and one world government (with shared federalist powers) will be a great thing. We are not ready for it yet, but as any student of history would be remiss not to admit, its the unrelenting path civilization has been blazing for over 2000 years. The advent of the United States, and the EU are the prime examples. Also consider NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Asian equivelent, the United Nations and NATO.

One day, the USA, the EU and maybe some other federations, as of yet unformed, will join in agreements leading to the next step in global government. There will still be local governments, but some shared powers and some non-shared powers will be given to the larger good.
Click to expand...

When that day comes you will be little more than a feedlot animal behind a fence and with as little rights as well.
 
Smarterthan\\(())// said:
for someone who's supposed to be intelligent, you obviously haven't learned anything from history. even recent history.
Click to expand...

I never claimed to be intelegent.

Personally it seems to me you have not learned anything from history.

What was the largest nation 300 years ago?

How many large nations were there 200 years ago?

Are Austria · Belgium · Bulgaria · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland · France · Germany · Greece · Hungary · Ireland · Italy · Latvia · Lithuania · Luxembourg · Malta · Netherlands · Poland · Portugal · Romania · Slovakia · Slovenia · Spain · Sweden and the United Kingdom still seperate nations?

If so what is the EU?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top