Baby killers cause Komen to cave

[PostmodernProphet]

Well, I will admit you're somewhat of an expert when it comes to stupid arguments.

of course, I've been reading yours for years......practice makes perfect.....

 

[apple0154]

of course, I've been reading yours for years......practice makes perfect.....

Oh, don't be modest. You were quite adept at it as witnessed by your arguments with others, as well.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Oh, don't be modest. You were quite adept at it as witnessed by your arguments with others, as well.

true, you're not the only liberal here.....

{please, you've got to stop handing these to me.....I need more of a challenge}

 

[apple0154]

true, you're not the only liberal here.....

{please, you've got to stop handing these to me.....I need more of a challenge}

Believe me, you're challenged enough when it comes to logic and common sense.

 

[apple0154]

For those who ponder the decision made at Komen here's Keith's take on it. The political corruption remains.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

For those who ponder the decision made at Komen here's Keith's take on it. The political corruption remains.

Thanks, that was awesome!

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

OK. Now that the question is settled, so what? What are the legal implications? What flows from the fact that a fertilized egg is a human life? Does the fertilized egg have all the rights we associate with "persons?"

THAT is what the debate should be about. The idiots that pretend it is not a human life are the equivalent of flat earthers. Whether or not the unborn human child should have rights or at what point the unborn child should have rights is certainly debatable.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

My argument is there is no baby. Babies are born. No birth, no baby.

That isn't an argument supported by anything other than your personal emotions. The stupidity of that comment is astounding.

 

[Bonestorm]

THAT is what the debate should be about. The idiots that pretend it is not a human life are the equivalent of flat earthers. Whether or not the unborn human child should have rights or at what point the unborn child should have rights is certainly debatable.

. . . and then there are the idiots that think a fertilized egg is "an unborn human child."

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

It's preventing a life of hell in a world that doesn't give a damn.

Who are YOU to decide the child doesn't deserve a chance?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

It's preventing a life of hell in a world that doesn't give a damn.

We have had this conversation many times... by your standard, we should go over to Africa/India/South America and kill off all the starving children and 'save' them a life of misery. See a homeless person? Put those bastards out of their misery, kill em off. Sorry, you are poor? Well, let me kill you and 'save' you a life of misery. What? You want a chance to fight for your life? Silly poor person, we know what is best for you. Death is way better for you. Trust us.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Here we go, again. Biology/science tells us a human being is an organism and an organism has to be able to carry on the processes of life.

Following so far?

OK. 50% of fertilized cells spontaneously abort within hours or days. Once you realize that is the case a little common sense should tell you a large number of fertilized cells are unable to carry on the processes of life meaning that are not organisms meaning they are not human beings and would never become human beings.

That's not too difficult to understand, is it?

How many times are you going to spout off the same stupidity?

Just because 50% (I would love to see where you get that stat) die and thus abort does not change the fact that they were human beings. Part of the process of life is the inevitable DEATH. For some it comes earlier than others. That doesn't change the SCIENCE. No matter how many stupid fucking analogies you try and post, NOTHING is going to change the actual genetics of the human life. If it is living, it will continue to grow. If it DIES, it is DEAD. Death doesn't change what it was when it was alive you moron. That's not too difficult to understand, is it?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

. . . and then there are the idiots that think a fertilized egg is "an unborn human child."

LMAO... tell us genius...

1) Is it human?
2) Is it alive?
3) Is it the combination of a human sperm cell and human egg cell?

If you answer yes to all three... it is indeed a human child (you can use progeny if the term child humanizes it too much for you to kill it) genetically speaking. That is 100% FACT.

 

[Bonestorm]

LMAO... tell us genius...

1) Is it human?
2) Is it alive?
3) Is it the combination of a human sperm cell and human egg cell?

If you answer yes to all three... it is indeed a human child (you can use progeny if the term child humanizes it too much for you to kill it) genetically speaking. That is 100% FACT.

A fertilized egg is a fertilized egg and a child is a child. The two are not the same or similar.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

A fertilized egg is a fertilized egg and a child is a child. The two are not the same or similar.

Wrong. A child describes the offspring of parents. You are still your parents child, even though you are now an adult. You were their child at conception. You were their child as an infant, toddler, adolescent, teen, young adult, adult...

As I stated, genetically a fertilized human egg cell is a human life. If the term 'child' is too hard for you to comprehend, you can go with progeny.

I can't help but notice that you are too cowardly to answer the three questions. Why is that? Does it make it harder for you to support those who ram metal spikes into the childs head to 'abort' it?

 

[Bonestorm]

Wrong. A child describes the offspring of parents. You are still your parents child, even though you are now an adult. You were their child at conception. You were their child as an infant, toddler, adolescent, teen, young adult, adult...

As I stated, genetically a fertilized human egg cell is a human life. If the term 'child' is too hard for you to comprehend, you can go with progeny.

I can't help but notice that you are too cowardly to answer the three questions. Why is that? Does it make it harder for you to support those who ram metal spikes into the childs head to 'abort' it?

Tell you what, go round up several hundreds of thousand of toddlers and freeze them. When the authorities apprehend you, just tell them that the toddlers are no different from fertilized eggs and see how you make out.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Tell you what, go round up several hundreds of thousand of toddlers and freeze them. When the authorities apprehend you, just tell them that the toddlers are no different from fertilized eggs and see how you make out.

in CA, go kill a woman who is pregnant and see how you make out.

 

[Bonestorm]

in CA, go kill a woman who is pregnant and see how you make out.

That's a really smart comment, Yurt.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Tell you what, go round up several hundreds of thousand of toddlers and freeze them. When the authorities apprehend you, just tell them that the toddlers are no different from fertilized eggs and see how you make out.

You are a fucking idiot. Where did I say there is no difference?

The two are completely separate stages of development. Just as toddlers and teens are different, yet BOTH are still human. Both are still the child of their parents. Aren't they moron?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

That's a really smart comment, Yurt.

For you, the sad part is that his comment is far more intelligent than your posts on here.