PUBS: Romney or bust

Socrtease said:
This thread is a perfect example of why this place is so hard to take for very long. The discussion actually started out ok, was on topic. Then post #7 DY has to use a nonseq and ask Top (Dude) about his national ranking in wrestling. WHY? Why can't people stick to the topic and stop using insults and bullshit to shut down debate. To his credit, STY ignores #7 and continues to talk about THE SUBJECT. DY comes back on subject for one post, and then devolves into Top teabagging Sandusky. Top has enough, retorts, and thus this thread begins to really go to shit. Why can't people stick to the topic and NOT insult, flame, and basically be rude assholes? WTF?
Click to expand...
I notice you have no problem with this though:
The Dude said:
I teabag your wife and autistic daughter.
Click to expand...

Fucking hypocrite.:fu:
 
DamnYankee said:
I notice you have no problem with this though:

Fucking hypocrite.:fu:
Click to expand...
I do have a problem with it. But more often than not you start the thing. This post is the perfect example. Top doesn't resort to this sort of insult until you have made two jabs at him. The first one a bullshit reference to what a great downhill skier you think you are and then when he doesn't bite you go straight to the gay sex innuendo. You are not happy unless there is tension on every thread you are on. If I were Top, I would put you on ignore.
 
Socrtease said:
I do have a problem with it. But more often than not you start the thing. This post is the perfect example. Top doesn't resort to this sort of insult until you have made two jabs at him. The first one a bullshit reference to what a great downhill skier you think you are and then when he doesn't bite you go straight to the gay sex innuendo. You are not happy unless there is tension on every thread you are on. If I were Top, I would put you on ignore.
Click to expand...

I suggest it regardless of who you are.


ANYWAYS....seriously, why vote for Romney? He's white Obama, who is in turn black Bush. We've been perpetuating at least 20 years of presidential mediocrity and growing authoritarianism. If the Libertarian party doest run someone good, I simply won't vote.
 
Emperor Septimius Severus said:
I suggest it regardless of who you are.


ANYWAYS....seriously, why vote for Romney? He's white Obama, who is in turn black Bush. We've been perpetuating at least 20 years of presidential mediocrity and growing authoritarianism. If the Libertarian party doest run someone good, I simply won't vote.
Click to expand...
I have repeatedly asked Gary Johnson to drop out of the republican primaries and get his team on getting him on all 50 ballots as an independent. Not necessarily a Libertarian, because that process, inside the party, is like herding cats. He needs to use grass roots campaigns and internet fund raising. I have no idea what I am going to do if my only choices come from the two wings of the same party.
 
Socrtease said:
I have repeatedly asked Gary Johnson to drop out of the republican primaries and get his team on getting him on all 50 ballots as an independent. Not necessarily a Libertarian, because that process, inside the party, is like herding cats. He needs to use grass roots campaigns and internet fund raising. I have no idea what I am going to do if my only choices come from the two wings of the same party.
Click to expand...

anyone who is not happy with the choices of (D), (R), or (L) may feel free to write me in on the ballot.
 
Socrtease said:
I do have a problem with it. But more often than not you start the thing. This post is the perfect example. Top doesn't resort to this sort of insult until you have made two jabs at him. The first one a bullshit reference to what a great downhill skier you think you are and then when he doesn't bite you go straight to the gay sex innuendo. You are not happy unless there is tension on every thread you are on. If I were Top, I would put you on ignore.
Click to expand...
Obviously you aren't following the situation very closely. Don't pretend that this shit hasn't been going on for years and that it starts in any one thread. Top never debates and is constantly insisting that his opposition is racist, or that he's more educated, wealthier, or physically stronger.

He could not prove his racist allegations so challenged me on my education. I bested him there so he claimed that he made more money, then I beat him on that. So he turned to sexual insults, first with my wife and then with my children. The moderators here then changed rule 12 to supposedly prevent sexual insults at children so Top tried another tactic, physical intimidation.

Top challenged me to meet up with him somewhere "in the ring". He's got a wrestling background so would have a natural advantage. He even offered to pay my expenses, but when I insisted that he pay up front he refused.

My response now is to challenge him by comparing his ability in his chosen sport with my ability in my chosen sport. Top realizes he lost there, so he's back to sexual insults.

In the past two days he's made attacks on my children, in direct violation of rule 12 and your moderation team is now busy making excuses for it. :fu:
 
DamnYankee said:
Obviously you aren't following the situation very closely. Don't pretend that this shit hasn't been going on for years and that it starts in any one thread. Top never debates and is constantly insisting that his opposition is racist, or that he's more educated, wealthier, or physically stronger.

He could not prove his racist allegations so challenged me on my education. I bested him there so he claimed that he made more money, then I beat him on that. So he turned to sexual insults, first with my wife and then with my children. The moderators here then changed rule 12 to supposedly prevent sexual insults at children so Top tried another tactic, physical intimidation.

Top challenged me to meet up with him somewhere "in the ring". He's got a wrestling background so would have a natural advantage. He even offered to pay my expenses, but when I insisted that he pay up front he refused.

My response now is to challenge him by comparing his ability in his chosen sport with my ability in my chosen sport. Top realizes he lost there, so he's back to sexual insults.

In the past two days he's made attacks on my children, in direct violation of rule 12 and your moderation team is now busy making excuses for it. :fu:
Click to expand...

most everyone on this board already knows that topspin is mentally and emotionally challenged when certain topics diminish his sense of manliness, which is why most people tend to ignore his juvenile outbursts. the question is, why can't you do it?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
most everyone on this board already knows that topspin is mentally and emotionally challenged when certain topics diminish his sense of manliness, which is why most people tend to ignore his juvenile outbursts. the question is, why can't you do it?
Click to expand...
I enjoy tormenting those who insult my family.
 
DamnYankee said:
We don't need Democrat Lite. A hard turn to the left requires a hard turn to the right. Stop letting the liberals choose our candidate for us. Cain is the one.
Click to expand...
That's the problem with you wingnuts. You don't understand the politics of the two major parties. That it is a process of coalition building. You think the Repelican party should only represent wingnuts when ya'll are a strong and vocal minority in the party. People like you are the best friends the Democratic party has as the Dems just continue to absorb the people whom ya'll run out of the party. In this case, it's not the liberals (though by your standards anyone who does not agree with your far right wing views is a liberal) who are choosing candidates for the Republican party. It's the responsible moderates who are trying to nominate a sane and competent chief executive and not some ideological incompetent like the last Repelican President.

All the Dems have to say though is do it your way. It's all to their benefit.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
That's the problem with you wingnuts. You don't understand the politics of the two major parties. That it is a process of coalition building. You think the Repelican party should only represent wingnuts when ya'll are a strong and vocal minority in the party. People like you are the best friends the Democratic party has as the Dems just continue to absorb the people whom ya'll run out of the party. In this case, it's not the liberals (though by your standards anyone who does not agree with your far right wing views is a liberal) who are choosing candidates for the Republican party. It's the responsible moderates who are trying to nominate a sane and competent chief executive and not some ideological incompetent like the last Repelican President.

All the Dems have to say though is do it your way. It's all to their benefit.
Click to expand...

fuck the politics of both parties. they are detrimental to a free nation. the process of coalition building days are over. the establishment politicos will not allow it to happen, evidenced by the after math of the ross perot campaign. the only reason that the dems can absorb the losers in to their party is that they have the same goal, fascism/socialism/communism. anything other than freedom.

we'd rather see the country burnt to ashes than return to the days of english type rule.
 
Socrtease said:
I have repeatedly asked Gary Johnson to drop out of the republican primaries and get his team on getting him on all 50 ballots as an independent. Not necessarily a Libertarian, because that process, inside the party, is like herding cats. He needs to use grass roots campaigns and internet fund raising. I have no idea what I am going to do if my only choices come from the two wings of the same party.
Click to expand...

Id suggest a Johnson/Paul combination for an independant or (L) ticket. I'm pretty sure the Libetarian party would be more than happy with it. But then again they migh just go full retard and put up another statist like last time. FUCK Bob Barr
 
Mott the Hoople said:
That's the problem with you wingnuts. You don't understand the politics of the two major parties. That it is a process of coalition building. You think the Repelican party should only represent wingnuts when ya'll are a strong and vocal minority in the party. People like you are the best friends the Democratic party has as the Dems just continue to absorb the people whom ya'll run out of the party. In this case, it's not the liberals (though by your standards anyone who does not agree with your far right wing views is a liberal) who are choosing candidates for the Republican party. It's the responsible moderates who are trying to nominate a sane and competent chief executive and not some ideological incompetent like the last Repelican President.

All the Dems have to say though is do it your way. It's all to their benefit.
Click to expand...

Or, after Carter we got Reagan. After Carter II we should get Reagan II, not Carter Lite.
 
Yurt said:
imo...there is no other candidate who has a chance of beating obama. romney has a chance. i think it is a 50/50 chance. but put up any other pub candidate and obama wins hands down.

if not, why not.
Click to expand...

I think Newt could beat Obama also. His issues with his ex wife thing, once I read that article by his daughter, are baseless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top