G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Do you see anything that suggests the boy who beat up the gay kid is not a bully?
Is calling the suspect a 'bully' an accusation?
Do you see anything that suggests the boy who beat up the gay kid is not a bully?
Is calling the suspect a 'bully' an accusation?
Considering the event was captured on video, would you claim he is not a bully?
That's not the issue.
If describing someone a drunkard is an 'accusation', does describing someone as a 'bully' fit your definition of an accusation?
http://gma.yahoo.com/boy-assaults-gay-student-cell-phone-captures-attack-135315478.html
"An Ohio high school student waited in a classroom to attack a 15-year-old gay classmate, beating him repeatedly in a vicious assault captured by a bystander on a cell phone."
This sort of bullshit makes my blood boil. My only hope is that this bully gets what is coming to him.
We had a 15 year old girl stab two other girls in nearby a city high school- nearly killing one of them- because she wanted to see what it was like to kill someone. High Schools are starting to look a lot more like prison institutions, with regards to to behavior, then people like to think.
My daughter's school has had a rash of pregnancies and several serious drug problems because the kids "wanted to see what it felt like". I think there is a serious lack of guidance for these kids.
And while bullying has always been around, the lengths to which kids take it today is sick.
Anyone who would condone such an evil act is not worth engaging in discussions. I don't engage rabid dogs in discussions either.
We had a 15 year old girl stab two other girls in nearby a city high school- nearly killing one of them- because she wanted to see what it was like to kill someone. High Schools are starting to look a lot more like prison institutions, with regards to to behavior, then people like to think.
I've heard other murderers give that explanation as well. Even if you literally just assign the lives of other human beings zero value, it seems stupid. I think they just want to seem more dramatic and enigmatic than they really are, and being honest about their primitive emotions wouldn't contribute to that.
Anyway, as I've stated before, violence really isn't nearly as bad as it used to be. It's somewhat ironic to look back on the present era as more pure and orderly than the last, but that's what the data says. Even in the safest country in the world, some people are going to stab each other sometimes.
http://gma.yahoo.com/boy-assaults-gay-student-cell-phone-captures-attack-135315478.html
"An Ohio high school student waited in a classroom to attack a 15-year-old gay classmate, beating him repeatedly in a vicious assault captured by a bystander on a cell phone."
This sort of bullshit makes my blood boil. My only hope is that this bully gets what is coming to him.
They should charge all those who stood by, with criminal indeference.
How about those who constantly belittle gays and talk about their immoral actions causing all sorts of evil to be visited on us? Do they share any responsibility?
I hear you regarding the idea that violence has always been part of the human condition, it goes with out explanation that we would disagree as to why that is... nonetheless, violence has always been a part of society. My point is that in this country, the violence in our youth culture, has devolved. I remember high school from the late 70's- we got high- pulled pranks. But kids were not overtly violent and depressed. Though I know that even from my older sisters high school years in the 60's things had begun to slide down hill- and now a days, it's like anything goes. You don't have the vantage point older generations have- but truly kids were just more respectful and responsible as a whole then they are now.
But, you're kind of looking at an outlier and using it to condemn the whole. I never had experiences with violence like that when I was in school. My class was actually quite boring. Really, compared to what happened between the boomers and the greatest, the millenials are kind of tame*. It's not the case that the thing to do amongst the youth used to be pulling pranks and getting high, and now we're really into stabbling each other. There were students who stabbed each other at some schools in your day as well; you shouldn't take the specific and use it to establish a general case. You should avoid generalizing. If you must generalize, you should do so with boring statistics that look at the group as a whole. You shouldn't try to do so with anecdotes.
*Perhaps not such a bad thing. The boomers started pointless rebellion, adopted leftism as revolutionary shik, more as a fashion statement than anything with a coherent ideology, and soon the right co-opted their bullshit anti-authoritarian rhetoric anyway and soon produced something even more conservative than the Greatest ever dreamed of anyway.
So many kids come across as both entitled to whatever they want and calloused to what others deserve i.e. respect; empathy; consideration. This is why bullying and other forms of violence have taken a more deadly turn imo.
Ahhh. Most insightful. Do you suppose they get that attitude from a society/political system that encourages one to grab what they can and to hell with others even if those others can not afford basic medical care?
Ahhh. Most insightful. Do you suppose they get that attitude from a society/political system that encourages one to grab what they can and to hell with others even if those others can not afford basic medical care?
How about those who constantly belittle gays and talk about their immoral actions causing all sorts of evil to be visited on us? Do they share any responsibility?