We need to nominate, then elect Herman Cain!

Actually, no he's not. As you pointed out, his branch is one of three EQUAL branches. Nothing in the Constitution grants him authority over the other two branches, therefore, he can't logically or factually be considered "the head" of government.

One could say Clinton was "the head" of government.
 
Who said this:

"The face of terrorist is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace, they represent evil and war.

When we think of Islam, we think of a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the world. Billions of people find comfort and solace and peace. And that's made brothers and sisters out of every race, out of every race.

America counts millions of Muslims amongst our citizens, and Muslims make an incredibly valuable contribution to our country.

The Muslims are doctors, lawyers, law professors, members of the military, entrepreneurs, shopkeepers, moms and dads, and they need to be treated with respect."

Why did you cons all the sudden abandon this line of discussion?
 
Who said this:

"The face of terrorist is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace, they represent evil and war.

When we think of Islam, we think of a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the world. Billions of people find comfort and solace and peace. And that's made brothers and sisters out of every race, out of every race.

America counts millions of Muslims amongst our citizens, and Muslims make an incredibly valuable contribution to our country.

The Muslims are doctors, lawyers, law professors, members of the military, entrepreneurs, shopkeepers, moms and dads, and they need to be treated with respect."

Probably your hero, George W. Bush. He said things you agree with so often he is on the top of the list of Jarod's most quoted Presidents.
 
Probably your hero, George W. Bush. He said things you agree with so often he is on the top of the list of Jarod's most quoted Presidents.

My point is, and you are smart enough to not pretend you dont understand it, that such a broad spectrum of people disagree with Cain's radical position regarding Muslims holding judicial office and cabnent level positions that he can never get even the Republican nomination.

He holds such a radical position that not only is it diametricly opposed to the United States Consitution, it is opposed to the clear conshous of the VAST majority of Americans.
 
It's amazing how poet exposes what an intolerant bigot he is in almost every post. I see dozens and dozens of generalizations, stereotypes, and misconceptions about his fellow man, and he seems to be completely oblivious to his closed-minded intolerance. Not only is he an intolerant bigot about his fellow Americans, he seems to have a disdain for America in general, but so as to not appear too 'unpatriotic' he jumps back on his moral high horse and lectures us about behavior and morality.


You know what is so funny about this is that you have used this type of post to describe every poster who disagrees with you. Do you have a template you pull out each time and just fill in the "name of the day"

Have you ever bother to look at your own blather?

Your tired old line that we are un American and unpatriotic and blah, blah, blah. You write the same stuff so often I could write it for you.
 
Why did you cons all the sudden abandon this line of discussion?


Jarod, I have to give you props! All the years and all the stuff these guys pile on you, you take it like a man! I admire your steadfastness. Keep up the good fight.
 
You know what is so funny about this is that you have used this type of post to describe every poster who disagrees with you. Do you have a template you pull out each time and just fill in the "name of the day"

Have you ever bother to look at your own blather?

Your tired old line that we are un American and unpatriotic and blah, blah, blah. You write the same stuff so often I could write it for you.

You'll find very few times I have ever called someone "un-American" or "unpatriotic" here, or anywhere. I might explain how your viewpoint is un-American, or I may point out how your position is unpatriotic, but I try not to label an entire group of people the way poet does. If you are too ignorant and blind to understand what intolerant bigotry is, it's likely you suffer from it as well.
 
You'll find very few times I have ever called someone "un-American" or "unpatriotic" here, or anywhere. I might explain how your viewpoint is un-American, or I may point out how your position is unpatriotic, but I try not to label an entire group of people the way poet does. If you are too ignorant and blind to understand what intolerant bigotry is, it's likely you suffer from it as well.

Dixie do you disagree with article 6 of the U.S. Constitution?
 
You'll find very few times I have ever called someone "un-American" or "unpatriotic" here, or anywhere. I might explain how your viewpoint is un-American, or I may point out how your position is unpatriotic, but I try not to label an entire group of people the way poet does. If you are too ignorant and blind to understand what intolerant bigotry is, it's likely you suffer from it as well.


This is priceless, you rarely call anyone unpatriotic, I have to stop laughing before I prove you wrong!
 
This is priceless, you rarely call anyone unpatriotic, I have to stop laughing before I prove you wrong!

The mind boggles. Dixie, the arbiter of what position is or isn't patriotic. Newsflash, Dix. If someone isn't actively working against the government, like al-Awlaki, then he's patriotic.
 
It's amazing how poet exposes what an intolerant bigot he is in almost every post. I see dozens and dozens of generalizations, stereotypes, and misconceptions about his fellow man, and he seems to be completely oblivious to his closed-minded intolerance. Not only is he an intolerant bigot about his fellow Americans, he seems to have a disdain for America in general, but so as to not appear too 'unpatriotic' he jumps back on his moral high horse and lectures us about behavior and morality.

I find it funny that the biggest and best bigots and racists, have the audacity to point fingers at me. Generalizations, stereotypes and misconceptions? Lions, tigers and bears, oh my. About my fellow man? Who in the Sam Hill ever said I consider you and your fellow cretins, "my fellow men"? That's being presumptuous, on your part. I have nothing to do with racists and bigots, and folks who want to inflict their arcane religious views and beliefs on the rest of us. I believe in "live and let live"...it's you conservatives that want everyone to march "lockstep" to your fascist and Nazi views. Intolerance? How dare you even type the word. A disdain for America? Today's America, you betcha. Rampant racism, bigotry, hatred of gays, minorities, the poor, children, foreigners...and the glorification of the rich, the self-serving, and fake Christians. This ain't "my America". At least you got that one right.
 
I find it funny that the biggest and best bigots and racists, have the audacity to point fingers at me. Generalizations, stereotypes and misconceptions? Lions, tigers and bears, oh my. About my fellow man? Who in the Sam Hill ever said I consider you and your fellow cretins, "my fellow men"? That's being presumptuous, on your part. I have nothing to do with racists and bigots, and folks who want to inflict their arcane religious views and beliefs on the rest of us. I believe in "live and let live"...it's you conservatives that want everyone to march "lockstep" to your fascist and Nazi views. Intolerance? How dare you even type the word. A disdain for America? Today's America, you betcha. Rampant racism, bigotry, hatred of gays, minorities, the poor, children, foreigners...and the glorification of the rich, the self-serving, and fake Christians. This ain't "my America". At least you got that one right.

YOU are the embodiment of everything you rail against. You're closed minded, bigoted and use race. YOU are the fake. The wolf in sheep's clothing. YOU are the false Christian. Your own religion condemns your behavior, yet you rail and rant against those who point out the error of your ways. Jesus warned us about you.
 
YOU are the embodiment of everything you rail against. You're closed minded, bigoted and use race. YOU are the fake. The wolf in sheep's clothing. YOU are the false Christian. Your own religion condemns your behavior, yet you rail and rant against those who point out the error of your ways. Jesus warned us about you.

I spit on you. I laugh at you. You can kiss my ass and suck my dick. The reason I know that I'm erring on the side of caution is the fact that if it were not for the grace of God, and his many blessings, I wouldn't be here. The fact that I am, is testimony to his faithfulness and mercy. And I know in my heart, that we're supposed to love our enemies, and turn the other cheek. I'm still working at it, as I haven't mastered that one yet. When have you ever said anything similar? No. You're so convinced that you're right and have God's righteousness that you have no problem condemning me.....like it was 1860, and your whiteness was your justification.

I came to the conclusion that God doesn't make mistakes. He made me as I am...as he made you. He expects us to be our best selves. Wolf in sheep's clothing? You must be looking in a mirror. You keep thinking the way that you do, and acting the way you're acting...and we'll see, who comes out on the other side. Self-righteous hypocrite. Reprobate. Satanist. Pedophile. Misogynist. Racist. Bigot. Neanderthal. Cretin. Miscreant. Heathen. Vermin.
 
Dixie do you disagree with article 6 of the U.S. Constitution?

Article 6 doesn't apply to what we're discussing... Unless Cain appointed a Muslim and then Congress rejected him on the basis of his religion... THEN it would apply. The President can appoint someone based on how they smile, if he so chooses, it's entirely up to him, and there is no prerequisite that he pick someone based on, (or not based) on their religion. He can use any "litmus test" he wants to, it's entirely his choice!
 
Bitch...

And you, reinforcing the 'fucked-up-ness" with your avatar of non-descript "titties", as if, those titties would allow you to caress them. How hedonistic and sexualized. You've reduced women to sex objects, like the typical Neanderthal male, and you think of yourself as King of the Forest. But supposedly you have kids. And have taught them "your values" (or the lack thereof). And we wonder why everything is so fucked up. We have folks like you to thank. And, yes, I just "read" you to filth.

It looks like we've stumbled upon your real problem Poet. You're sexually frustrated. Obviously you were obsessed with female breasts when you were younger and your sloppy advances were met with refusal. So you turned gay. How sad. :)
 
It looks like we've stumbled upon your real problem Poet. You're sexually frustrated. Obviously you were obsessed with female breasts when you were younger and your sloppy advances were met with refusal. So you turned gay. How sad. :)

Heterophobia is such a terrible thing to witness. Men who afraid of women is just more evidence that our society is growing weaker instead of stronger.
 
Article 6 doesn't apply to what we're discussing... Unless Cain appointed a Muslim and then Congress rejected him on the basis of his religion... THEN it would apply. The President can appoint someone based on how they smile, if he so chooses, it's entirely up to him, and there is no prerequisite that he pick someone based on, (or not based) on their religion. He can use any "litmus test" he wants to, it's entirely his choice!

The president cannot use a religous test to weed out canidates. Do you disagree?
 
Back
Top