When is onecell and company

Yurt said:
tff how christie and onceler ignore the actual report

must believe obama at all costs....
Click to expand...

Oh, I looked at the report. Apparently you're the one who missed something.

At the top, the line reading "Seat Passenger Name Agency Remarks"

Stateroom seats hold First Lady and Marian Robinson.

Senior Staff seats hold Sasha, Malia, etc.

Staff seats hold Trooper, etc.

Too bad your ODS blinds you to how the Air Force classifies seating on the plane.
 
christiefan915 said:
Oh, I looked at the report. Apparently you're the one who missed something.

At the top, the line reading "Seat Passenger Name Agency Remarks"

Stateroom seats hold First Lady and Marian Robinson.

Senior Staff seats hold Sasha, Malia, etc.

Staff seats hold Trooper, etc.

Too bad your ODS blinds you to how the Air Force classifies seating on the plane.
Click to expand...

uh no, seat designation is blank for them. if you take off your partisan blinders, you will notice it says seat passenger name. notice the space between the two. the only seat designation is the stateroom, there are no other designations.

i'll believe it from a source other than obama's admin.
 
Take note of the section in the middle of the plane called "Senior staff".

But keep on spinning, it's amusing.

air-force-one-big-fp-800x615.jpg
 
Onceler said:
Well, that's that. You & bravs are spot on for this one - I am now officially spitting angry.

This shit is worse than Target-gate. This is a friggin' outrage...
Click to expand...

I am truly pissed. I wasted time reading this thread. Leave it to Yurt to defend yet more stupidity. That poor spaz will argue any side of any argument provided you are on the other side of it.
 
Yurt said:
other than labeling the daughters as senior staff, which seems against rules, what is the big deal? wives of presidents should do this and have been doing this. are you against laura bush's trips?
Click to expand...

Superfreak said:
I am truly pissed. I wasted time reading this thread. Leave it to Yurt to defend yet more stupidity. That poor spaz will argue any side of any argument provided you are on the other side of it.
Click to expand...

ooops, SF spazzes again and makes a fool out of himself
 
Yurt said:
ooops, SF spazzes again and makes a fool out of himself
Click to expand...

Not really. Your 1st sentiments on the thread were correct. Then you got all huffy because christie & I were chiming in, and you joined the circus.

When you started talking about manifests & all that, you were w/ bravs & the OP. Sorry 'bout that. Or, as you might say....oooooooops.....
 
Onceler said:
Not really. Your 1st sentiments on the thread were correct. Then you got all huffy because christie & I were chiming in, and you joined the circus.

When you started talking about manifests & all that, you were w/ bravs & the OP. Sorry 'bout that. Or, as you might say....oooooooops.....
Click to expand...

i didn't realize talking about facts got under your skin. all we have are the manifest and obama's claim. and then christie's claim they were on airforce one. show me more than just "obama said"....that really shouldn't be too much. especially for you liberals who never took bush at his word.
 
Yurt said:
i didn't realize talking about facts got under your skin. all we have are the manifest and obama's claim. and then christie's claim they were on airforce one. show me more than just "obama said"....that really shouldn't be too much. especially for you liberals who never took bush at his word.
Click to expand...

Why? As DSH said previously, who cares how they were designated, and what the manifest said?

Only anyone who this is a real story to. Like I said: you joined the circus. It's all here in black & white.
 
Who gives a fuck how the children were identified on the manifest? Seriously. What does it matter? I'm trying to understand your point here, Yurt, but I don't get it. Let's assume that the children were identified as "Senior Staff," so what?
 
Onceler said:
Why? As DSH said previously, who cares how they were designated, and what the manifest said?

Only anyone who this is a real story to. Like I said: you joined the circus. It's all here in black & white.
Click to expand...

why doesn't it matter? what if the bill is different? i would imagine senior staff would be treated different for expense purposes and who is billed, a la the taxpayers. if you can show that it wouldn't matter, ok.

but, so far, i've seen no proof, other than obama's statement, that they were only designated that for seating purposes. there are "guests" labeled under the same section as the kids. further, christie tried to bolster the claim by incorrectly claiming they were on airforce one.

funny how you don't correct that.
 
David St. Hubbins said:
Who gives a fuck how the children were identified on the manifest? Seriously. What does it matter? I'm trying to understand your point here, Yurt, but I don't get it. Let's assume that the children were identified as "Senior Staff," so what?
Click to expand...

wouldn't the tax payers be billed differently for their trip?
 
Yurt said:
why doesn't it matter? what if the bill is different? i would imagine senior staff would be treated different for expense purposes and who is billed, a la the taxpayers. if you can show that it wouldn't matter, ok.

but, so far, i've seen no proof, other than obama's statement, that they were only designated that for seating purposes. there are "guests" labeled under the same section as the kids. further, christie tried to bolster the claim by incorrectly claiming they were on airforce one.

funny how you don't correct that.
Click to expand...

This pretty much contradicts your first response on this thread.

You joined the circus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top