When is onecell and company

[cancel2 2022]

What makes you think the same seating parameters wouldn't apply, no matter what the plane? They're seated according to importance and that's the bottom line. I guess you forgot Gingrich's hissy fit back in the 90s because his seat on AFO was back with the hoi polloi rather than in the front like a senior staffer.

You can dig in your heels like a mule and argue until hell freezes over, but the only people you're going to persuade that the Obama kids are "senior staffers" are the ideological hacks like yourself.

Much ado about nothing.

 

[Onceler]

Much ado about nothing.

At least bravo had the good sense to bail after he posted the thread...

 

[christiefan915]

Much ado about nothing.

Truer words. But the way yurt's arguing, I suspect he's a paid operative for the RNC.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Truer words. But the way yurt's arguing, I suspect he's a paid operative for the RNC.

so asking questions is now arguing

could you be a bigger hack?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

What makes you think the same seating parameters wouldn't apply, no matter what the plane? They're seated according to importance and that's the bottom line. I guess you forgot Gingrich's hissy fit back in the 90s because his seat on AFO was back with the hoi polloi rather than in the front like a senior staffer.

You can dig in your heels like a mule and argue until hell freezes over, but the only people you're going to persuade that the Obama kids are "senior staffers" are the ideological hacks like yourself.

you're a jackass. you're even paying attention to what is being said. and what makes you think they would apply? tff....they do it too....who cares about gingrich. where is onceler whining about "they do it too"....oh yeah, you're a lefty, so its cool.

next

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

At least bravo had the good sense to bail after he posted the thread...

so i guess you had the good sense to bail on your claim i contradicted myself.

good one, much easier than admitting you're wrong.

 

[Onceler]

so i guess you had the good sense to bail on your claim i contradicted myself.

good one, much easier than admitting you're wrong.

Still don't know what you're talking about. You're proving SF, and by extension my comment about your response to his post, more correct every time you continue to defend this & parse the arguments.

You don't realize that, do you?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Still don't know what you're talking about. You're proving SF, and by extension my comment about your response to his post, more correct every time you continue to defend this & parse the arguments.

You don't realize that, do you?

still dishonestly denying you said i contradicted myself.

what a hoot. your ability to live in denial is amazing.

 

[Onceler]

still dishonestly denying you said i contradicted myself.

what a hoot. your ability to live in denial is amazing.

If I'm somehow wrong in that, then you were flat-out lying when you called SF a fool for saying you're defending this stupidity, and used that post as proof.

Which is it?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

If I'm somehow wrong in that, then you were flat-out lying when you called SF a fool for saying you're defending this stupidity, and used that post as proof.

Which is it?

nice try moron. i haven't defended anything, in fact, i was against bravo's OP, except for a concern about the senior staff, which i said "seems" wrong. so SF, got it wrong that i defended anything...now....what did i contradict in my in response? you can't explain it can you.

LOL

 

[Onceler]

nice try moron. i haven't defended anything, in fact, i was against bravo's OP, except for a concern about the senior staff, which i said "seems" wrong. so SF, got it wrong that i defended anything...now....what did i contradict in my in response? you can't explain it can you.

LOL

LOL - talk about "ability to live in denial."

Okey dokey - whatever you say...

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

LOL - talk about "ability to live in denial."

Okey dokey - whatever you say...

what ever i say? you said i contradicted myself. you have yet to show what the contradiction is. you've had half a dozen times to do so, and yet you still can't manage to do it. why is that?

so yeah...nice wuss out. like i said, much easier than admitting you're wrong.

 

[Onceler]

what ever i say? you said i contradicted myself. you have yet to show what the contradiction is. you've had half a dozen times to do so, and yet you still can't manage to do it. why is that?

so yeah...nice wuss out. like i said, much easier than admitting you're wrong.

You used that post to make some sort of case that you weren't defending this stupidity. And you've spent the whole thread defending this stupidity.

Ergo, contradication.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

other than labeling the daughters as senior staff, which seems against rules, what is the big deal? wives of presidents should do this and have been doing this. are you against laura bush's trips?

why doesn't it matter? what if the bill is different? i would imagine senior staff would be treated different for expense purposes and who is billed, a la the taxpayers. if you can show that it wouldn't matter, ok.

but, so far, i've seen no proof, other than obama's statement, that they were only designated that for seating purposes. there are "guests" labeled under the same section as the kids. further, christie tried to bolster the claim by incorrectly claiming they were on airforce one.

funny how you don't correct that.

This pretty much contradicts your first response on this thread.

You joined the circus.

You used that post to make some sort of case that you weren't defending this stupidity. And you've spent the whole thread defending this stupidity.

Ergo, contradication.

nice try liar. one more time....this is your last chance to prove your case.

as we can see, you claimed the post was to superfreak, that is clearly wrong. now you're claiming it was about not defending the OP, which is also wrong.

last chance.

 

[Onceler]

Last chance? Ooooooooh!

Yurt, you're funny. You used your initial post as an example of how you're not defending the stupidity of the OP. YOU designated it that way. The fact that you're sprinting from that now is hilarious. It was useful that way to counter SF, but of course, it can't be what you said, because you need it for something different now w/ me.

I'll tell ya - it's obvious to anyone who isn't psychotic....

 

[christiefan915]

you're a jackass. you're even paying attention to what is being said. and what makes you think they would apply? tff....they do it too....who cares about gingrich. where is onceler whining about "they do it too"....oh yeah, you're a lefty, so its cool.

next

I know it's hard for you to hold more than one thought at a time in your brain, so I'll make it simple.

1. There's a seating protocol on the president's planes;

2. Sasha and Malia were sitting in the 2nd highest protocol seats, behind their mother, who was in the Stateroom.

Got it now?

 

[Onceler]

I know it's hard for you to hold more than one thought at a time in your brain, so I'll make it simple.

1. There's a seating protocol on the president's planes;

2. Sasha and Malia were sitting in the 2nd highest protocol seats, behind their mother, who was in the Stateroom.

Got it now?

Hey, he's not defending anything. He's just "curious."

 

[christiefan915]

Last chance? Ooooooooh!

Yurt, you're funny. You used your initial post as an example of how you're not defending the stupidity of the OP. YOU designated it that way. The fact that you're sprinting from that now is hilarious. It was useful that way to counter SF, but of course, it can't be what you said, because you need it for something different now w/ me.

I'll tell ya - it's obvious to anyone who isn't psychotic....

I guess if the girls are called "Senior Staff", then Mrs. O. is called "Stateroom". Because that's what the passenger manifest shows, doncha know?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

I know it's hard for you to hold more than one thought at a time in your brain, so I'll make it simple.

1. There's a seating protocol on the president's planes;

2. Sasha and Malia were sitting in the 2nd highest protocol seats, behind their mother, who was in the Stateroom.

Got it now?

cite?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Last chance? Ooooooooh!

Yurt, you're funny. You used your initial post as an example of how you're not defending the stupidity of the OP. YOU designated it that way. The fact that you're sprinting from that now is hilarious. It was useful that way to counter SF, but of course, it can't be what you said, because you need it for something different now w/ me.

I'll tell ya - it's obvious to anyone who isn't psychotic....

how did you prove that the post contradicted anything i said in the OP? the post you said i contradicted myself was to YOU, not SF, how can you lie about such simple stuff? and the post doesn't contradict anything i said in the OP.

i knew you would fail and i knew you would lie.

thanks