Obama Lies about the ‘Do-Nothing Congress’

Alias

Banned
Obama Lies about the ‘Do-Nothing Congress’
His party, not the Republicans, is the obstacle.

'‘This Congress, they are accustomed to doing nothing, and they’re comfortable with doing nothing, and they keep on doing nothing,” President Obama whined at a September 15 Democratic National Committee gathering in a private Washington residence.

Now that his “Blame Bush” hobby horse finally has retired to the glue factory, Obama resorts to pinning America’s woes on the “Do-Nothing Congress.” If only these parliamentarians would stop taking endless lunches, sipping cocktails at Capitol Hill happy hours, and napping at their desks, America might have some chance of returning to normal.

Obama speaks as if the entire Congress were in lock-step Republican opposition to his every initiative. Damn those pesky elephants!

Of course, Obama’s rhetoric cynically turns things upside down.

Congress consists of a do-something House of Representatives, run by Republicans, and a do-nothing Senate controlled by Obama’s very own Democrats. Obama evidently believes that if he can keep spouting clever lies and distortions, no one will call him on it. Well, it’s time to do so.

The 112th Congress has been characterized by a very active legislative pace in the Republican House, featuring the passage of many measures designed to revive America’s exhausted economy.

The Democratic Senate, meanwhile, is a much lazier place, where House Republicans’ measures go to die.

The figures bear this out, beyond debate.

Through September 15, the Republican House had been in session for 120 days. The Democratic Senate through the same date had been in session only 115 days.

In terms of recorded votes, the two bodies are as different as Times Square and the Everglades. Through September 15, the GOP House had voted 711 times. Meanwhile, across the same period, the Democratic Senate had only 137 recorded votes. So, the allegedly lethargic GOP legislators whose sloth dooms the nation actually are five times as energetic as their indolent counterparts in the Democratic Senate.

This distinction might discredit House Republicans if they wasted their time voting on National Apricot Yogurt Month and similar matters of national urgency. In fact, Republicans have approved serious legislation designed to get America moving.

“Our new majority has passed more than a dozen pro-growth measures designed to address the jobs crisis,” Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor wrote Obama on September 6. “Aside from repeal of the 1099-reporting requirement in the health care law, however, none of the jobs measures passed by the House to date have been taken up by the Democrat-controlled Senate.”

These have included bills to reduce anti-business regulations, accelerate offshore oil production, and speed the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry Canadian oil to refineries in Texas. The pipeline alone would create 20,000 jobs.

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid seems to be in no rush to consider Obama’s American Jobs Act, even though Obama wants it enacted “right now!”

“We’ve got to get rid of some issues first,” Reid said. For now, he is not sure “exactly what I’m going to do yet with the president’s jobs bill,” especially since some of Reid’s own Democrats, such as Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Jim Webb of Virginia, seem ho-hum about Obama’s $447 billion Stimulus Jr.

While House Republicans adopted a budget last April 15, the Democratic Senate has not approved a budget since April 29, 2009. This Democratic inaction seems to violate the U.S. Congressional Budget Act, which requires passage of an annual budget resolution. Indeed, the Senate rejected Obama’s budget in May by a vote of 0 to 97 — with every Democrat in the chamber voting nay.

Obama can disagree with every piece of paper passed by the GOP House. But when he slyly bashes Republicans by accusing “this Congress” of “doing nothing,” he simply is lying through his teeth. If Obama wants the entire Congress to get something done, he should tell Harry Reid to wake up and do his job.

— New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.

http://www.drudgereport.com/
 
UpTheCreek2WebCR2-9_26_11-thumb-700xauto-466.jpg
 
Looks like the facts just don't agree with you Fecias. Maybe we should change your name to Specious.

The 112th Congress = The Do-Nothing Congress?



Posted on May 31, 2011 by Douglas
It seems like there has been more bluster coming from Capitol Hill in this 112th Congress than normal. But then, what else would you expect after the 2010 Congressional Elections swept in some…wellcolorful personalities. Mundane things that used to pass without considerable fuss–the raising of the debt ceiling–have now become battle royales in a fight for political supremacy, one which the people will ultimately decide on November 6, 2012.
Some people, including myself, knew that this year would see much more gridlock than the previous Congress, given the divided nature of our federal government. However, how does this Congress compare to previous divided Congresses? Has this been a busy Congress, a normal Congress, or a Do-Nothing Congress?
Perhaps a little background is needed on the term “Do-Nothing Congress”. In the 1946 Congressional Elections, the Republicans captured unified control of Congress, gaining 54 seats in the House and 12 in the Senate to unseat Senate Majority Leader Alben W. Barkley (D-KY) and Speaker of the House Sam Rayburn (D-TX). The 80th Congress clashed with President Harry S. Truman (D-MO) repeatedly, rejecting much of President Truman’s Fair Deal legislation, and attempting to turn back the legislative legacy of FDR’s New Deal coalition. They, instead, passed many pieces of pro-business legislation, such as the Taft-Hartley Act, which allowed the introduction of “right-to-work” laws, curtailed labor contributions to political campaigns, and prohibited sympathy strikes. Using the mantra of the “Do-Nothing Congress”, President Truman campaigned vigorously against the policies passed by the 80th Congress in the 1948 Presidential Elections. The result was a Democratic sweep at the ballot box, with the election of President Truman for a full term and a net gain of 75 seats in the House and nine in the Senate.
simply use the term to mean whether this Congress has registered a similar amount of legislative activity in relation to other divided Congresses. This is determined by the simple number of legislation sent to the President’s desk, whether or not the President actually signs it into law or not. I also wanted to examine the proportion of bills that focused on jobs, given that Republicans campaigned very heavily on job creation in 2010.
First, the numbers on bills sent to the President during other recent divided Congress by the end of the first May in the Congress:


Congress

[TD="width: 20%"]
President
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Party seat difference in House
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Party seat difference in Senate
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Number of bills sent to President
[/TD]

[TD="width: 20%"]
112th
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Obama
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
49
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
6
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
16
[/TD]

[TD="width: 20%"]
99th
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Reagan
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
71
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
6
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
91
[/TD]

[TD="width: 20%"]
98th
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Reagan
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
103
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
8
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
124
[/TD]

[TD="width: 20%"]
97th
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
Reagan
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
50
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
6
[/TD]
[TD="width: 20%"]
87
[/TD]



There are a couple of things missing from the data, as there does not appear to be a way to determine the overall ideological composition of each individual Congress. This may help better understand whether there was actual conflict between the chambers like there is today, especially given that many members of Congress and Senators who were Democrats throughout the 1980s became Republicans during the mid-1990s. In any case, you can see that the output of the 112th Congress is markedly lower than Congresses that were in similar situations, with the Congress presenting only sixteen bills to the President thus far. In fact, the 112th Congress had only about 18.4 percent of the legislative activity of the Congress with the next lowest rate of legislative production, and has the lowest legislative output of any Congress to this point since the Library of Congress’s THOMAS legislative databank began collecting this data with the 93rd Congress (1973-1974).
As far as the “jobs, jobs, jobs” mantra heard throughout the last campaign is concerned, that has not panned out either. This Congress has passed only two bills that could be characterized as being legislation that would seek to induce job creation; the rest have been either symbolic legislation (the naming of Post Offices and federal government buildings after things or people), budgetary continuing resolutions, or foreign policy legislation. That comes out to 12.5 percent of the bills passed. That does not inspire confidence in the new Republican leadership that they have a laser focus on our nation’s economy.
The legislative pace just might pick up before the end of the Congress after next year’s general elections. But if this Congress continues at this pace, they could end up with the dubious distinction of being one of the least productive Congresses in American history.
http://myprogressivelife.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/the-112th-congress-the-do-nothing-congress-2/
 
The Democrats control the Senate. If this congress is a "do nothing congress", then Obama is trashing his own party. Debunk that.

The Senate is not going to pass Obama's jobs bill. Who are you going to blame that on?
 
I didn't admit anything.

You lost the house. Whose fault is that?

Are you stupid? I answered this question already.

The Koch brothers, in concert with Fox news brought on the loss of the house, by spending billions of dollars to manipulate ignorant rednecks such as yourself into voting against their own best interests.
 
Are you stupid? I answered this question already.

The Koch brothers, in concert with Fox news brought on the loss of the house, by spending billions of dollars to manipulate ignorant rednecks such as yourself into voting against their own best interests.

No, you didn't answer the question. You attempted to put words in my mouth and you were stopped. Another sign of your total dishonesty. YOUR pals lost the house. Why did your pals lose the house?
 
No, you didn't answer the question. You attempted to put words in my mouth and you were stopped. Another sign of your total dishonest. YOUR pals lost the house. Why did your pals lose the house?

You want the reason behind the reason?

A corrupt Supreme Court, run by an appointee of a corrupt president decided that corporations are people, and that even if they are foriegn corporations, they can spend all the money they see fit to corrupt our elections.

Debunk that.
 
Last edited:
You want the reason behind the reason?

A corrupt Supreme Court, run by an appointee of a corrupt president decided that corporations are people, and that even if they are foriegn corporations, they can spend all the money they see fit to corrupt our elections.

Debunk that, shit eater.

The Supreme Court didn't cast all those ballots in the last election. Your party lost the house because they were voted out by a majority of the American people. Why is that?
 
The Supreme Court didn't cast all those ballots in the last election. Your party lost the house because they were voted out by a majority of the American people. Why is that?

The Supreme Court allowed the monied neo-cons to brainwash the ignorant masses, such as yourself, Mr.T and Dixie into voting for TeaBagger liars, who have done naught but the will of the neo-cons since they were elected.

The other reason of course, is that an incumbent usualy loses seats in Congress in the election following, but don't let the facts get in the way of your rant or anything.

By the way, I am done here. You bore me.
 
The Democrats control the Senate. If this congress is a "do nothing congress", then Obama is trashing his own party. Debunk that.

The Senate is not going to pass Obama's jobs bill. Who are you going to blame that on?

That right...change the subject once your ridiculous lies get brought to light!

ROTFLMAO!
 
I didn't admit anything.

You lost the house. Whose fault is that?

That's the secret to your debating "skills" isn't it?

You NEVER admit anything, you just continually argue in circles, changing the subject and/or resorting to taunts when you get cornered..
 
That right...change the subject once your ridiculous lies get brought to light!

ROTFLMAO!

Your President is drowning. He's on his way out and probably will not even run. The scandals are going to take over the news soon. You and your pals don't even realize it yet.
 
No, you didn't answer the question. You attempted to put words in my mouth and you were stopped. Another sign of your total dishonesty. YOUR pals lost the house. Why did your pals lose the house?

HIS dishonesty?

How about you dodging answering a question for 14+ pages now...you are the very MODEL of dishonesty!

Oh...and our "pals" lost the HOuse because YOUR PALS are better liars...which I imagine is how YOU became so adept at dodging answers and evading facts.
 
That's the secret to your debating "skills" isn't it?

You NEVER admit anything, you just continually argue in circles, changing the subject and/or resorting to taunts when you get cornered..

Who are you going to blame when you lose the Senate and the White House?
 
Back
Top