Romney is doomed!

Are you making the assertion that there were no Iraq's invading another country?

No im not. I am making hte assertion that Iraq did not have WMD nor were they seeking to buy Yellow Cake. You are being silly if you are trying to say anyone belives that there was only one Iraq war.
 
No im not. I am making hte assertion that Iraq did not have WMD nor were they seeking to buy Yellow Cake. You are being silly if you are trying to say anyone belives that there was only one Iraq war.

But there has only been one Iraq war. There have been several different campaigns within the war, that have been associated with different titles; but there has only been one war with Iraq and it is still ongoing.

As to the rest of your complaint, they were not necessary for the cessation of the hostilities.

I noticed that you have completely ignored every one of Saddam's violations.
Why is that?
 
And since you were able to find this, then you should also be able to find the definition of a cease fire and what it entails.

Here's a hint: A cease fire is not a peace treaty. :)

Lack of hostilities for 12 continous years indicayes to me that for those 12 years we were not at war.
 
Lack of hostilities for 12 continous years indicayes to me that for those 12 years we were not at war.

Unfortunetly, you have provided nothing to show that your 12 year offering has anythng to do with the ending of a war.
There have been highly publicized reports of enemy forces during WW I, where forces stopped fighting and exchanged "Christmas gifts". Are you trying to say that those ceasefires continued until a peace treaty was signed.

By the way, you might want to do just a little more studying on this; because there was no 12 years of a "lack of hostilities", as you have suggested. :)
 
Unfortunetly, you have provided nothing to show that your 12 year offering has anythng to do with the ending of a war.
There have been highly publicized reports of enemy forces during WW I, where forces stopped fighting and exchanged "Christmas gifts". Are you trying to say that those ceasefires continued until a peace treaty was signed.

By the way, you might want to do just a little more studying on this; because there was no 12 years of a "lack of hostilities", as you have suggested. :)

I am trying to say you are a moron who is entitled to his wrong opinion and I don't give two shits.
 
But there has only been one Iraq war. There have been several different campaigns within the war, that have been associated with different titles; but there has only been one war with Iraq and it is still ongoing.

As to the rest of your complaint, they were not necessary for the cessation of the hostilities.

I noticed that you have completely ignored every one of Saddam's violations.
Why is that?

You can argue those semantics all you want, everyone knows the reality of the situation.

Because Saddam's violations were not the reason Bush used to lead the march to slaughter.
 
You can argue those semantics all you want, everyone knows the reality of the situation.

Because Saddam's violations were not the reason Bush used to lead the march to slaughter.

You have thus far failed to address the FACT that Viet Nam was a lie as well.
 
I am trying to say you are a moron who is entitled to his wrong opinion and I don't give two shits.

Then that would make the translation to mean that you can't prove shit and are just running on feelings.
Someone call Dune a Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance. :lol:
You're a fucking puss. :)
 
You can argue those semantics all you want, everyone knows the reality of the situation.

Because Saddam's violations were not the reason Bush used to lead the march to slaughter.

Show where anyone needs to provide a reason to end a cease fire. :)
 
Romney is the least dangerous of the GOP kooks?!!

romney-armadillo.jpg


The country will be doomed too, if Perry is elected president?!!

perry-failure.jpg


perry-screws-texas.jpg
 
Back
Top