Way to go Obama II!

[Cancel 2016.2]

i am a douche bag

yes, we know.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

i wear pink panties.

tmi

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Again you moron... WEINER DID NOT RUN. In 2010, WEINER was the incumbent. In 2010, Weiner did not have major Dems coming out against him. In 2010, the economy was BETTER than it is today.

and if weiner were up today without a scandal i bet he would win again. it is hilarious to watch spazz out over opinions.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

and if weiner were up today without a scandal i bet he would win again. it is hilarious to watch spazz out over opinions.

No one is spazzing except for you as you try to defend your moronic opinion. What I have stated is based on polling data, news articles, comments from prominent Dems and what the campaigns ran on.... that goes far beyond just being my personal opinion you dolt. You have repeatedly stated Weiners scandal was a cause... yet you have done nothing to justify or explain why anyone would hold Weiner's actions against another Dem?

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

No one is spazzing except for you as you try to defend your moronic opinion. What I have stated is based on polling data, news articles, comments from prominent Dems and what the campaigns ran on.... that goes far beyond just being my personal opinion you dolt. You have repeatedly stated Weiners scandal was a cause... yet you have done nothing to justify or explain why anyone would hold Weiner's actions against another Dem?

its ok, there there....

btw, i never said it was the only cause

carry on, this really doesn't mean anything to me

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

its ok, there there....

btw, i never said it was the only cause

carry on, this really doesn't mean anything to me

In other words, you have nothing to back up your assertion that Weiner caused people to vote for a Rep even though he wasn't running. Thanks.

Next time just admit you are an idiot and it will save us all a lot of time.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

like i said, i don't see it so much a take on obama, meaning, he probably has some part in it, but imo, it is mostly about weinergate. wasn't he just reelected in 2010?

Just so you remember your own stupidity....

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

In other words, you have nothing to back up your assertion that Weiner caused people to vote for a Rep even though he wasn't running. Thanks.

Next time just admit you are an idiot and it will save us all a lot of time.

chill...i've already backed up my opinion as much as you, IOW, with solely opinions.

this is really a silly thing to get so excited about. if you really want to keep arguing, go for it. it just is not that important of an issue. it is a non issue. a pub is in and it doesn't look good for obama. i think you and others are blowing way out of proportion.

have at it

 

[Onceler]

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/14/n...-avoid-upset-in-special-election.html?_r=1&hp

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/sep/13/republicans-maintain-stranglehold-cd2/


Two special elections yesterday.... and the Dems got smoked. The NY seat held by Dems for almost a century.... goes Rep. Obama has to be proud.

Of course, what you're not saying is that any incumbent Republican would have likely gotten trounced just as easily.

People are pissed. Not just at Obama.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

chill...i've already backed up my opinion as much as you, IOW, with solely opinions.

this is really a silly thing to get so excited about. if you really want to keep arguing, go for it. it just is not that important of an issue. it is a non issue. a pub is in and it doesn't look good for obama. i think you and others are blowing way out of proportion.

have at it

LMAO... YOU are the one who is wound up sparky. You have done NOTHING to back up your position. There are no articles to support your nonsense, no opinions of ANYONE other than you, nada.... whereas every single article that is out there right now on the win by Turner states that voters went against him due to what I stated.

You fucking retard.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Of course, what you're not saying is that any incumbent Republican would have likely gotten trounced just as easily.

People are pissed. Not just at Obama.

well given the articles were on these two elections, I commented on them. I am sorry I didn't cover every district in the country. totally my fault.

 

[Rune]

skippy.

Oops!

Alias called me skippy yesterday.

Huh, this is only the second use of "skippy" I have seen on this board.

Co-inky-dink? I think not.

At a minimum, you owe Rana a tremendous apology, but you really should just resign in shame you scandalous cretin.

 

[Rune]

Bump for yurt.

 

[Rune]

Bump for yurt.

 

[Rune]

Return of Dune (Today)​

---

Today 12:24 PM #0 | Top
Yurt

• 
  View Profile
• 
  View Forum Posts
• 
  Private Message
• 
  View Blog Entries
• 
  Add as Contact

.


Join DateMar 2008Posts28,900Thanks1,224Thanked 772 Times in 640 PostsGroans782Groaned 763 Times in 699 Posts


[h=2]

[/h]

Originally Posted by Superfreak
So you think Dem voters decided... 'hey, we are going to hold Anthony Weiner's indiscretions against the new Dem candidate'????

That is pretty retarded. Again... READ the story.... PAY attention to the comments in this and most other stories about this election. The common thread is not weinergate, but the ECONOMY, Obama's handling of the economy and Obama's position on ISRAEL.



calm down skippy. it is just an opinion. if it was all about obama and the economy, how did weiner win in 2010. obama hasn't changed his stance on israel since then. and the economy is pretty much the same. this is not the first time someone from a party screws things up so bad that people vote in the party just to spite. it was a 8% percent difference in vote iirc.​

Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It is already tomorrow in Australia.​

Charles Schulz​

​

 

[Rune]

Yurt is Alias.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Yurt is Alias.

Makes sense. Both are incessant whiners.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

chill out freak, you're spazzing my thread.

again, you're posting opinions. and that is fine. those opinions could very well be right and it had nothing to do with weiner. i find that highly unlikely as weiner was just reelected last year. obama's position on israel has not changed since then, as far as i know. the economy is not that different now than it was then. imo, weiner's scandal was likely a tipping point for people on the fence. it was only an 8% difference. and don't forget, turner lost to weiner in 2010.

FYI Yurt.... apparently Obama disagrees with your stupid opinion as well....

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/u...may-cost-democrats-votes.html?ref=todayspaper

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

FYI Yurt.... apparently Obama disagrees with your stupid opinion as well....

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/u...may-cost-democrats-votes.html?ref=todayspaper

you're still obsessing over a non issue. wow. why are you spazzing over this? and your link doesn't support your statement. good grief, you need to calm down and let this one go.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

you're still obsessing over a non issue. wow. why are you spazzing over this? and your link doesn't support your statement. good grief, you need to calm down and let this one go.

LMAO.... Not spazzing you little twit... just mocking your complete stupidity.

The fact that you think Obama trying to shore up the Jewish vote after the NY special election has nothing to do with my comments in this thread just proves how ignorant you are.