In spite of lies by the gay lobby...

DamnYankee said:
Again, why don't you just shut the fuck up? :)
Click to expand...

Again, why don't you stick to the topic and we can debate or discuss it. You ought to know by now that I don't "shut the fuck up" unless I want to do so. But your hissy fit is duly noted.
 
Sinn Fein said:
In this instance and many other yes. Dune is not beyond redemption however and will have debates with people, when he feels up to it. I really wish you'd let it go Yurt. I'm asking you, as a friend, just let the personal shit stop.
Click to expand...

dude, this isn't personal. dune is continuing the same thing but the only people being singled out are alias and i think SM. i'm not continuing anything, i'm just tired of the double standard. since you asked nicely, i'll drop it. i would appreciate it if dune would be reeled in as well.

btw, you could just PM next time.
 
Yurt said:
dude, this isn't personal. dune is continuing the same thing but the only people being singled out are alias and i think SM. i'm not continuing anything, i'm just tired of the double standard. since you asked nicely, i'll drop it. i would appreciate it if dune would be reeled in as well.

btw, you could just PM next time.
Click to expand...
Thank you. I asked you in specific because out of everyone you have, IMO, the most to contribute. I do plan however to ask everyone to drop the bullshit.
 
The proposed amendment, as passed by the legislature, destroys the typical liberal arguments:

Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts.
Click to expand...
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2011/Bills/Senate/PDF/S514v3.pdf
 
DamnYankee said:
There's nothing to prohibit a gay man from marrying a woman.
Click to expand...

exactly my point, he cannot marry anyone he chooses. thus he is not given equal rights. that is like saying a black person can only marry a black person and it is equal because the man can marry any black woman he wants.
 
Yurt said:
exactly my point, he cannot marry anyone he chooses. thus he is not given equal rights. that is like saying a black person can only marry a black person and it is equal because the man can marry any black woman he wants.
Click to expand...
A straight guy couldn't marry his sister or his horse either. What's your point? :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top