In spite of lies by the gay lobby...

DamnYankee said:
LOL You've been having a hissy fit for years now, ever since you posted that picture of your fat kids. :)
Click to expand...

Jeez, are you back to this again? Is this what you call debate? Leave people kids out of it and stay on topic.
 
DamnYankee said:
A straight guy couldn't marry his sister or his horse either. What's your point? :D
Click to expand...

And you complain about me posting a strawman? No one has ever suggested removing the laws against incest or beatiality. And no has suggested marriage not be between consenting adults.
 
poet said:
North Carolina....isn't that the land of the Hatfields and the McCoys, inbred Neanderthals, who marry their cousins? They have no credibility when it comes to marriage.
Click to expand...
You fucking idiot. That was West Virginia and Kentucky back country. Apparently your claim of being a literary genius was bullshit along with the rest of your claims.
 
DamnYankee said:
Gay marriage is, idiot. Read the fucking posts before you open your rotting pie hole. :)
Click to expand...

Yurt posted: "would you agree that those relationships are illegal and homosexuality is not?"

You replied (quoting that post): "Currently in NC they all are, and we mean to keep it that way."


Yurt clearly stated "homosexuality". While the context of all this may be gay marriage, your reply was a claim that homosexuality is illegal in NC. Before you throw a hissy fit you might want to be clear in what you post.
 
DamnYankee said:
That conversation goes back to post 77, idiot.
Click to expand...

Yeah yeah, so you claim you quoted a post but were replying to another post? lol

Or is this just another "I answered the question, just not how you wanted me to"?
 
Don't get all hissy because you chimed into the middle of a conversation without understanding the background and again look like a complete and total fool.
 
DamnYankee said:
Don't get all hissy because you chimed into the middle of a conversation without understanding the background and again look like a complete and total fool.
Click to expand...

I didn't chime in the middle. You just want to avoid debating me on this topic again.

You quoted one thing and (in your mind) referred to another. That is not my fault. That is you not being clear. And I am not the one cussing someone for posting, so the only hissy fit would be yours.

Stick with the topic and be clear in what you say.
 
Yurt said:
i know what you mean here, but i was specifically referring to the relationships, not marriage.

can you clarify your stance now?
Click to expand...
So there is no further misunderstanding, why don't you repeat the question in the context that you want?
 
LOL at the libtards here that claim gay marriage is inevitable:
Campbell — who opposes the amendment — said that she thinks that the amendment may stand a better chance of passage in May than November because Republicans will be voting in large numbers in presidential and gubernatorial primary contests. Democrats won't have as many exciting races on the ballot.

John Dinan, a professor of political science at Wake Forest University... believes there's no doubt that voters will approve the amendment banning same-sex marriage. He cited the long list of states that have approved such amendments, especially in the South.

"The lowest score was 57 percent in Virginia," he said. "I don't think anybody has doubt about whether it would pass. We have had 31 times that these things have been submitted and 30 times they were successful. Only one time was it defeated (in Arizona), and then it came back and won."
Click to expand...
http://www2.journalnow.com/news/2011/sep/14/wsmain01-marriage-vote-set-for-may-ar-1388308/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top