my responses are thoughtful and i asked you essentially the very same question STY did. with me, however, you had an meltdown. i don't what your issue is, but it is clear that when you get cornered and busted in a lie, you just lash out. you could have been honest like me and admit your mistake right away. instead, you go down your usual course of heaping more lies upon the lie in order to not admit you're wrong.
i haven ot fabricated anything you've said. do you see what is happening here? i'm trying to discuss the issue with you, you keep attacking and deflecting away from WHO you were talking about. you have yet to expressly say - yes, i was talking about nagin. until you do, there is no point in having any further discussion with you because it is clear you will continue to be dishonest about it because you screwed by claiming you didn't bring nagin up. if you hadn't freaked out and went into meltdown mode, we could be conducting a rational discussion about this.
You are delusional. You need to read back over the past few pages, though I don't think that will help. You're responses were nothing like STY's. You refused to listen to my answers, which I gave many times. I don't even really know what you're talking about, anymore; I brought up Nagin very briefly in the leadership discussion, but it was to make a point about Bush. I was only ever talking about Bush, and have never stated otherwise. And you keep asking like it's some sort of lie or gotcha.
I do see what is happening here. You're fucking dumb as a box of rocks, and not interested in debate. Look at STY's reply; it is the reply of someone interested in debate, not gotchas.