Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
I don't agree with Rana much on economics, but seeing her aggressively shout "make them!" turns me on a little. Especially in those red panties.
:megusta:
I am not privvy to what the government knows. I just wondered how you know for sure all the warnings were fake. Do you have any proof of your claim?
FYI, you're not British.
Well a lot of the tea party folk weren't in office during the Bush years so are they not suppose to complain about spending? And what happened to the Democrats and liberals that rightly complained about Bush's overspending? They're awfully quiet now. So they only dislike spending when it is the opposite party doing it? Yet people like Ron Paul and Libertarians who consistently spoke out against spending across all administrations are deemed kooks. In case people haven't noticed our spending has reached a point where it cannot be sustained. That's not a partisan position that is a fact. So feel free to keep your head in the sand and claim false outrage while at least some people are acknowledging the problem and attempting to act on it.Yea, yea, yea....were the fuck were you guys during the Bush years when he ran up our debt more then any US President in our history? Yea boy....you sure were out there raising hell about all that spending, weren't you? [/sarcasm]
It's not exremism from the right that's being pointed out, other then their "We're going to take our ball and go home if we don't get our way" tantrums they've been throwing. No, what's disgusting most of the public is their fucking complete hypocrisy.
Correct me if I'm wrong. Wasn't it Dick Cheney who said "Deficits don't matter.". So why the fuck do they matter now? Huh?
Spare me the false outrage.
You want Rana to make you some little red panties?I don't agree with Rana much on economics, but seeing her aggressively shout "make them!" turns me on a little. Especially in those red panties.
:megusta:
Of course he's British.
Chinese.
Great - making everyone have to start paying more for everything is just what we need - especially the poor and unemployed. Fiscal liberalism is truly spawned of complete idiocy.
there are uneducated idiots in every mob, just look at the liberals. I tend to group the ones that make broad generalizations of actions intended to label an entire group as uneducated idiots.
FYI, you're not British.
Of course he's British.
why does he claim to be chinese?
I understand the concept. And even if I did not, having it explained does not make it any less stupid.Modest inflation could help in eroding the deficits, it's not without risk however. This article explains it in greater detail.
http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/4413
I understand the concept. And even if I did not, having it explained does not make it any less stupid.
A sluggish, perhaps soon to be contracting economy with high levels of unemployment, people living below poverty level, mortgage default again on the rise, (in short - a general problem with a large portion of the population making ends meet on a daily basis) and you think we should deliberately induce inflation to make things WORSE for them, all in order to magically "shrink" the deficit by making it smaller in relation to the GDP? (Does nothing to actually pay it down, just makes it look smaller, like looking at it through a backwards telescope.)
Stupid does not even begin to describe the idea.
why does he claim to be chinese?
He doesn't. I've never seen it.
True, but no where near as funny as watching a bank clerk try to talk about science. LOLalways nice to see an op-ed from a communications co-coordinator discussing economics.
True, but no where near as funny as watching a bank clerk try to talk about science. LOL
True, but no where near as funny as watching a bank clerk try to talk about science. LOL