Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
Pacifism is the easy route, for it requires that you simply do nothing.
Pacifism is the easy route, for it requires that you simply do nothing.
for me....that would be the difficult route
i don't understand pacifism in all its many facets. you can have peace accomplished by violence. it is an unfortunate reality of our world. whether you believe in jesus or not.
Ofcouse not.But I dont need to be violent myself to stop them.
Does this mean Jesus, Gandhi, Quakers, and other peaceful persons or groups don't deserve respect because they're "doing nothing"?
How many rapes have the courageous gunlovers on this board prevented by waving their popguns around?
Just wondering.
You should do some research, friend. I don't think that guy is Sohei... Buddha taught that not even he could stop war, while he teaches against the glorification of war he understood its existence and did not shun Warriors as a caste. Admitting Kings and Warriors into his presence he would speak and teach, some he would urge to give up the Warrior life, others he would not, and then still others he would not allow into his presence until they had completed their military service. It is complex but Buddhist warriors exist, Buddhist cops, and Buddhists understand that they choose their path and the responsibilities that come with it. Many people make simple assumptions about something complex, they seem to believe it is "easy" and that there is some dogma that all should follow, but Buddha spoke against that. The reality is that Buddhists are found in every walk of life, including the military.
Im very feramiller with what rape is. That why 1 peace maker has more courage the a million solders.
Im very feramiller with what rape is. That why 1 peace maker has more courage the a million solders.
standing there to get shot, beat, or stabbed is not courage. It's stupidity.
Peaceful does not equate to pacifism. While Jesus and Ghandi did not preach violence as the first measure of response, they did not shun it entirely.Does this mean Jesus, Gandhi, Quakers, and other peaceful persons or groups don't deserve respect because they're "doing nothing"?
I would say being willing to die for your convictions is very courageous. Standing there knowing you will be shot or stabbed takes huge cojones.
My objection whether it actually accomplishes anything.
You should do some research, friend. I don't think that guy is Sohei...
Buddha taught that not even he could stop war, while he teaches against the glorification of war he understood its existence and did not shun Warriors as a caste. Admitting Kings and Warriors into his presence he would speak and teach, some he would urge to give up the Warrior life, others he would not, and then still others he would not allow into his presence until they had completed their military service.
It is complex but Buddhist warriors exist, Buddhist cops, and Buddhists understand that they choose their path and the responsibilities that come with it. Many people make simple assumptions about something complex, they seem to believe it is "easy" and that there is some dogma that all should follow, but Buddha spoke against that. The reality is that Buddhists are found in every walk of life, including the military.
I sometimes wonder what Buddha would have thought of the Shaolin Monks.
Peaceful does not equate to pacifism. While Jesus and Ghandi did not preach violence as the first measure of response, they did not shun it entirely.
The war in Iraq, by contrast, has accomplished a lot, hasn't it?
We found all the WMDs and got a source for cheap oil, all at very little cost, didn't we?
Did I say the Iraq war (or any war) accomplished anything? If all you can do is troll, please sit quietly and let the grownups talk.