Eugenics in the United States

christiefan915 said:
What's really funny is that bravo started this crap and you're giving him a pass on it. Read his other thread and get back to me.

bravo: "She espoused the thinking of eugenicists -- similar to Darwin's "survival of the fittest" -- but related the concept to human society, saying the genetic makeup of the poor, and minorities, for example, was inferior."

"On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities: "More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control

"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population."
Click to expand...

lol....so now its bravo's fault you made a thread that blamed others for sanger's views

you dishonestly cut off your first sentence in your weak attempt to say you held her responsible:

dishonest attempt:
Sanger got her kooky ideas....
Click to expand...

what you really said:
Sanger got her kooky ideas from some of our most prominent citizens
Click to expand...

why did you feel the need to cut off your sentence christie? since you don't have a mind, i can't read it :D
 
Negro, are you kidding me...I might overlook my 92 year old mother using this phrase, but you...no chance, Uncle Cracker
 
christiefan915 said:
OMG, you are an Idiot with a capital "I". Do you really think that a bunch of conservatives are going to give me a pat on the back for my posts?

Get your head examined, your deficits are overpowering any ability you ever had to write a lucid post.
Click to expand...

what? so now its just consevatives who....

good lord, you need your head examined.....its always soeone else....no wonder you can't fathom how i think, you're not smart enough to let go of partisan hack politics......your entire world view is slanted hard left and all your opinions about those who are not as far left as you are biased and mostly unfounded. take off your blinders and we would likely have good discussions.
 
Yurt said:
lol....so now its bravo's fault you made a thread that blamed others for sanger's views

you dishonestly cut off your first sentence in your weak attempt to say you held her responsible:

dishonest attempt:

what you really said:

why did you feel the need to cut off your sentence christie? since you don't have a mind, i can't read it :D
Click to expand...

Man, you're really bananas. Do you really think that changes what christie was trying to say?

Oh, and hey - I'm not really sure...do we still have a draft going for the military these days?

lol
 
christiefan915 said:
I repeat: You're dumb as a box of rocks.

Rockefeller is John D. (March 21, 1906 – July 10, 1978), not the senator.
Click to expand...
Thats hillarious....wtf are you even talking about now....not the senator.....

I said..."You might want to inform Hillary about these guys and see if she'll say nice things about them too....Sen. Rockefeller was a Democrat wasn't he ? He'll want to defend the family name too....

I'm talking about the Senator....the Democrat...that might want to defend the family name....that would be John Jay....a friend of Hillary's I'm sure.

One of us is as dumb as a box of rocks and its obviously not me....considering that off the wall post of yours...

Whats your point ?.....Oh, that they were white guys? yeah how about that...Sanger was white too....
 
christiefan915 said:
I find it deeply disturbing that someone would start a thread on an event from over two years ago, apparently to try and allege that Hillary supported the eugenics movement just because she admired Sanger for her work with women and birth control.

You claim you're indifferent to Sanger and the others yet you've answered and/or groaned a number of posts. Not a sign of indifference.

Furthermore, you're showing characteristics of some of the fringe righties here, which is to tell everyone what I really mean. I don't need someone to translate my comments; I'm perfectly capable of answering for what I write. Furthermore, you're abetting yurt and bravo in the fiction they created that somehow I'm "supporting" Sanger because I started a thread on the entire movement. Maybe you just don't like seeing the unsavoury aspects of this country's past brought to light, but that's your problem, not mine.
Click to expand...

No, that's not it at all. I groan your comments because I do not like you, and the reason I do not like you is you're an unkind individual. I don't seem to have such trouble getting along with other liberals on this site (although I do find Dune and Kenneth to be annoying). Why don't we get along? Because you've been rude and unpleasant toward me from day one.
 
bravo said:
I should give it a shot, huh?.....Like you gave a shot to Thomas Jefferson referring to his sex life with a Negro slave like that was the only thing he did in his life that mattered.....
Give it a shot ?.....Maybe you ought to give it a rest while you still have some dignity left.
Click to expand...

OIC. And Sanger's looney support for eugenics is the only thing she did in life that mattered?

Let's see, how about everybody here who has never used artificial birth control represent. Or are you hippogriffs going to say "that's different."
 
bravo said:
Thats hillarious....wtf are you even talking about now....not the senator.....

I said..."You might want to inform Hillary about these guys and see if she'll say nice things about them too....Sen. Rockefeller was a Democrat wasn't he ? He'll want to defend the family name too....

I'm talking about the Senator....the Democrat...that might want to defend the family name....that would be John Jay....a friend of Hillary's I'm sure.

One of us is as dumb as a box of rocks and its obviously not me....considering that off the wall post of yours...

Whats your point ?.....Oh, that they were white guys? yeah how about that...Sanger was white too....
Click to expand...

wait.........but christie says its everyone else who can't read

LOL
 
Onceler said:
Man, you're really bananas. Do you really think that changes what christie was trying to say?

Oh, and hey - I'm not really sure...do we still have a draft going for the military these days?

lol
Click to expand...

it absolutely changes what she says...its downright amusing that you think it doesn't...wait...no, its actually rather boring and expected....she completely leaves out she got the ideas from others....which was MY point...thats why christie dishonestly cut her sentence in half to leave that out...and no surprise the boad's most dishonest hack comes along to defend her....shocking i tell you, shocking

what does a draft have to do with this thread? man you are dumb....
 
Rana said:
Negro, are you kidding me...I might overlook my 92 year old mother using this phrase, but you...no chance, Uncle Cracker
Click to expand...
Well, thats what Sanger said dearie....NEGRO....you wouldn't have me put words in her mouth for the sake of political correctness in 2011, would you...???

And that is how Thomas Jefferson would refer to them also....i don't think "black" or "African American" was in vogue then..

or are you having a problem following what and who the thread is all about....? Maybe thats the case, you lack of reading comprehension.
 
Last edited:
Yurt said:
it absolutely changes what she says...its downright amusing that you think it doesn't...wait...no, its actually rather boring and expected....she completely leaves out she got the ideas from others....which was MY point...thats why christie dishonestly cut her sentence in half to leave that out...and no surprise the boad's most dishonest hack comes along to defend her....shocking i tell you, shocking

what does a draft have to do with this thread? man you are dumb....
Click to expand...

Frankly, I continue to be amazed by it. You continually react in the most whiny fashion when I bring up your reading challenges, but they're just so ubiquitous.

I'm sure there is some sort of online course or something that could help. It would be a better use of your time than hanging out here all day accusing people of things they didn't say....
 
King of Hops said:
No, that's not it at all. I groan your comments because I do not like you, and the reason I do not like you is you're an unkind individual. I don't seem to have such trouble getting along with other liberals on this site (although I do find Dune and Kenneth to be annoying). Why don't we get along? Because you've been rude and unpleasant toward me from day one.
Click to expand...

Rude and unpleasant since day one, really?

10-25-2010 10:50 AM #8 | Top
christiefan915

Welcome. Good posts. :good4u:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?28825-Salve

As long as we're getting personal, I neither like you, dislike you, or pay much attention to you. In fact, I thought those posts of yours that I actually read were pretty good, until you began showing your hatred and bigotry toward Muslims. You denigrate them horribly and unfairly, in my opinion, and when I spoke up you began the groaning and snide comments.

If you want to post hatred toward some religious or ethnic group, expect to be called on it. I despise bigots. You had me fooled for awhile, but not anymore.
 
Yurt said:
lol....so now its bravo's fault you made a thread that blamed others for sanger's views

you dishonestly cut off your first sentence in your weak attempt to say you held her responsible:

dishonest attempt:

what you really said:

why did you feel the need to cut off your sentence christie? since you don't have a mind, i can't read it :D
Click to expand...

Give up already. You're incapable of understanding anything but the simplest sentences.

I showed the parts of the sentences where bravo was referring to race, after you claimed I was focusing only on race. Why aren't you calling out bravo, yurtie? He included the race angle in his very first post on the other thread.

Selective recall. :rolleyes:
 
Onceler said:
Frankly, I continue to be amazed by it. You continually react in the most whiny fashion when I bring up your reading challenges, but they're just so ubiquitous.

I'm sure there is some sort of online course or something that could help. It would be a better use of your time than hanging out here all day accusing people of things they didn't say....
Click to expand...

and right on cue....the usual onceler petulant whines with absolutely zero discussion on the topic or his earlier claim. it's who you are, you make these petulant little bs claims about how so and so can't read and how you don't think this or that changes something....then you run away when confronted with logic and stick solely to ad homs.

if you had anything of value to add, you would have. if you had an ounce of courage, you would try and explain WHY taking out half the sentence, doesn't change it. but you know you can't, you're just here to bitch like a little boy who didn't get his pudding, you're petulant shit stirrer....nothing more.
 
christiefan915 said:
Give up already. You're incapable of understanding anything but the simplest sentences.

I showed the parts of the sentences where bravo was referring to race, after you claimed I was focusing only on race. Why aren't you calling out bravo, yurtie? He included the race angle in his very first post on the other thread.

Selective recall. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

LOL...and once again, its not YOU...its someone else....but never you christie....we can never talk about what YOU say, we must always focus on someone else. why is it you can't explain why you repeatedly have to bring up race. why is it you always have to point to bravo? you aren't adult enough to take responsibility for your actions?

why can't you explain why you dishonestly cut your sentence in half, when my point was that you blamed sangers views on others?

stop whining about bravo and address your own issues, stop running and crying about other people. grow up
 
Onceler said:
Frankly, I continue to be amazed by it. You continually react in the most whiny fashion when I bring up your reading challenges, but they're just so ubiquitous.

I'm sure there is some sort of online course or something that could help. It would be a better use of your time than hanging out here all day accusing people of things they didn't say....
Click to expand...

Almost 23,000 posts and none of them worth crap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top