Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
if a speculator (one who is neither a supplier or a user) is involved in the commodities market there is a high chance the user is buying from a speculator rather than a supplier
Over 90% of futures contracts never actually result in oil changing hands.
You seem to be greatly confused as you keep referring to speculators in a manner which would indicate they are some sort of middle man.
EVERY SINGLE purchaser and seller of a futures contract, whether they are a supplier, user or otherwise is a SPECULATOR. Period.
Every single one locks in a contract at a level they think is either too high (seller) or too low (buyer) relative to future expectations.
and, if speculators are involved, that will increase the volatility....isn't it obvious that is bad for both suppliers and users?....
Again, you seem to have some weird misconception about 'speculators'. All buyers and sellers are speculating on future prices and locking in contracts based on their personal expectations.
under my rationale no one should be allowed to buy or sell anything in the commodities market. unless they are suppliers or users....though to be honest, any futures market is not a good thing for consumers in any field whether it be bonds, mortgages, commodities, you name it....
which is quite simply a retarded suggestion. Do my clients not have the right to hedge their buying power and the effects changes in energy prices might have on their portfolios?
Your judgment on futures markets is nothing short of absurd. They are absolutely good for consumers in general.
you're trying to prove my point, aren't you....I thought you were arguing against me.....
I am absolutely arguing against your main point. Speculation being driven by uncertainty can indeed create more volatility, but again, that is not a terrible thing. It can cause pricing well above or BELOW fair value, but that is inherent in the market. You can't regulate uncertainty. It is absurd to think you can.