Now begins the hard work in Egypt.

Yurt said:
my comments are 100% true. for example i created a thread for you and i to debate without insults (because you were saying i insult all the time). your first post in that thread was an insult. even other members who are sick of you crap called you an asshole for that. you do in fact attack dixie with the same insults. see, most people are capable of having a rational discussion with their political opponents, for instance, bfgrn, him and don't see eye to eye on nearly anything and we trade insults, but, we engage in good debates at times because he isn't afraid to debate.

so once again, onceler delves into the lies instead of facing the truth and having a rational conversation.....like i said earlier, i didn't think you could do it. you simply are incapable of overcoming whatever is you have out for me and having a rational discussion. when it comes to me you're simply psychotic and irrational. its weird and perhaps disturbing. even when i ignore your insults, you continue them without stop. yet you can't simple have a rational discussion.

think about that....and hopefully you can get over what ever ails you.
Click to expand...

Once again, I must respectfully point out that most, if not all, of what you posted above is not correct. And again, I would point anyone else to the rest of the thread (as well as your post above) to judge who is correct, and who is incorrect.

Again, with all respect...
 
Rana said:
I wonder what the woman protesters are going to think about women not having a place in government if the brotherhood gets in? There were women in the crowd, along with the men, will they be denied?

I don't think the women who set up camp and stayed with their families during the protests are going to give away their rights.
Click to expand...
You're such a fool....90% of Egypt is Muslim and you quip in a serious way that women won't give away their rights.....
How stupid,,,how very, very stupid.....typical liberal naivete........
Let me put it to in as gentle a fashion as I can.....In Muslim countrys....
WOMEN HAVE NO FUCKIN' RIGHTS....
The only rights they have is the right to be a slave and enjoy whatever simple pleasures some men happen to think is appropriate at the time....
The right to be raped and stoned for the indiscretion...
The right to be sold in marriage at 6 or 8 years of age to some old child molester...
The right to wear your canvas prison known as a burka....
get a fuckin' clue, dearie....
 
Onceler said:
Once again, I must respectfully point out that most, if not all, of what you posted above is not correct. And again, I would point anyone else to the rest of the thread (as well as your post above) to judge who is correct, and who is incorrect.

Again, with all respect...
Click to expand...

what is not correct then onceler? you keep claiming its not true, but once again running away from actual discussion about it. "if not all"....really...i never made a thread for you and i to debate without insults, you were not called an asshole or some name like that for insulting me in your first post? you don't tell dixie or others they can't read. you don't insult others with the same insults as you insult me? bfgrn and i don't debate? with no respect, you're absolutely lying your ass off.

wow...i can go get the thread and prove it. do you want me to bump that thread, its in the whatever goes forum. if i do, will that help you move on? and finally realize you're the one being dishonest....i'm trying to help you.
 
Yurt said:
what is not correct then onceler? you keep claiming its not true, but once again running away from actual discussion about it. "if not all"....really...i never made a thread for you and i to debate without insults, you were not called an asshole or some name like that for insulting me in your first post? you don't tell dixie or others they can't read. you don't insult others with the same insults as you insult me? bfgrn and i don't debate? with no respect, you're absolutely lying your ass off.

wow...i can go get the thread and prove it. do you want me to bump that thread, its in the whatever goes forum. if i do, will that help you move on? and finally realize you're the one being dishonest....i'm trying to help you.
Click to expand...

As I said, kind sir, one need only read back through this thread to determine who is being honest & correct, and who is being dishonest, and a little weird.

You can bump what you would like to bump; the board is a free place, where posters can do as they please.
 
Onceler said:
As I said, kind sir, one need only read back through this thread to determine who is being honest & correct, and who is being dishonest, and a little weird.

You can bump what you would like to bump; the board is a free place, where posters can do as they please.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to do a Chicklet impression? If so, it's a really bad one... you gotta mention the "chronology" when talking about reading back through the thread!
 
Onceler said:
As I said, kind sir, one need only read back through this thread to determine who is being honest & correct, and who is being dishonest, and a little weird.

You can bump what you would like to bump; the board is a free place, where posters can do as they please.
Click to expand...

i didn't think you could actually point out what i said that was not correct and a lie. i knew you would back out from that, its all you do, make a claim, then run away from supporting it. your cop out says it all, when you know you're right, you will state why and link it. here.....nothing, not even one word on what i said that is not true or incorrect.

thanks for admitting i did not lie and was not incorrect. i know it was in a cop out fashion, but the fact you didn't state one single thing that was incorrect or a lie is all the proof anyone needs on who is making the incorrect and false claims.

:)
 
Yurt said:
i didn't think you could actually point out what i said that was not correct and a lie. i knew you would back out from that, its all you do, make a claim, then run away from supporting it. your cop out says it all, when you know you're right, you will state why and link it. here.....nothing, not even one word on what i said that is not true or incorrect.

thanks for admitting i did not lie and was not incorrect. i know it was in a cop out fashion, but the fact you didn't state one single thing that was incorrect or a lie is all the proof anyone needs on who is making the incorrect and false claims.

:)
Click to expand...

Once again, I must respectfully point out that you are incorrect. And I would encourage anyone who questions that to merely read through this thread.

And, I would add - as respectfully as possible - factual information is not necessarily one of your strong suits.
 
Onceler said:
Once again, I must respectfully point out that you are incorrect. And I would encourage anyone who questions that to merely read through this thread.

And, I would add - as respectfully as possible - factual information is not necessarily one of your strong suits.
Click to expand...

you said...."most, if not all"....not even one thing can onceler point out.

yes, if anyone cares to know the truth, onceler's avoidence speaks volumes.

not one and certaintly not "most, if not all".....you've hung yourself buddy. too bad.
 
Yurt said:
you said...."most, if not all"....not even one thing can onceler point out.

yes, if anyone cares to know the truth, onceler's avoidence speaks volumes.

not one and certaintly not "most, if not all".....you've hung yourself buddy. too bad.
Click to expand...

I respectfully disagree.

I think a thorough read-through of this thread will show who is obsessed, who is psychopathic, who is insulting and who is hypocritical. It will also show who is correct, and who is incorrect.

You are excellent at many things, Yurt, and deserving of great respect - but truthfulness & consistency are not among those things....
 
Onceler said:
I respectfully disagree.

I think a thorough read-through of this thread will show who is obsessed, who is psychopathic, who is insulting and who is hypocritical. It will also show who is correct, and who is incorrect.

You are excellent at many things, Yurt, and deserving of great respect - but truthfulness & consistency are not among those things....
Click to expand...

yet here you are obsessively claiming i'm not truthful and not consistent. dixie claims i'm two people, congrats, you and dixie both believe i'm not consistent. i'm not insulting you, i'm asking you to support your claims that i'm incorrect and lying.

and you can't. that speaks volumes.
 
Onceler said:
Once again, I must respectfully point out that you are incorrect. And I would encourage anyone who questions that to merely read through this thread.

And, I would add - as respectfully as possible - factual information is not necessarily one of your strong suits.
Click to expand...

LMAOooo... YEAH.... Read the Chronology of the Posts! It's obvious folks!
 
Yurt said:
yet here you are obsessively claiming i'm not truthful and not consistent. dixie claims i'm two people, congrats, you and dixie both believe i'm not consistent. i'm not insulting you, i'm asking you to support your claims that i'm incorrect and lying.

and you can't. that speaks volumes.
Click to expand...

Again, I'm not obsessively doing anything. I'm responding to your posts, in the most respectful way I know how; it's interesting that when I do that, I'm obsessive, but when I don't, I'm afraid. It's kind of a lose-lose situation, but again, I do feel compelled to respond when someone is less than truthful about me.

And again - a read-through of the thread will show who is obsessive, and who is incorrect.
 
Yurt said:
yet here you are obsessively claiming i'm not truthful and not consistent. dixie claims i'm two people, congrats, you and dixie both believe i'm not consistent. i'm not insulting you, i'm asking you to support your claims that i'm incorrect and lying.

and you can't. that speaks volumes.
Click to expand...

I don't claim you're two people. I know you are just one person, but I believe someone else, who is much more liberal than you, has access to your account, and posts here regularly under your name.
 
Onceler said:
Again, I'm not obsessively doing anything. I'm responding to your posts, in the most respectful way I know how; it's interesting that when I do that, I'm obsessive, but when I don't, I'm afraid. It's kind of a lose-lose situation, but again, I do feel compelled to respond when someone is less than truthful about me.

And again - a read-through of the thread will show who is obsessive, and who is incorrect.
Click to expand...

you're not responding with any respect. if you had any respect, you would answer my questions and rationally discuss what you claim i said is incorrect or a lie.

you feel "compelled to respond"....really? then why don't you actually DEFEND your claims? when people respond to false claims about them, they don't normally cop out. they actually try and show they are telling the truth. you............nah............just make the claim and hope all your buddies believe it. i can do that too, though i prefer providing evidence of my claims, but with you, you never do.

this how you make claims:

onceler - X is a liar. the above statement is not correct. thats not true. you can't read.

Y poster - could you back that up with a link or something?

onceler - no. believe it because i said it. just read the thread. i can't prove it, just read the thread.

D poster (when onceler knows he is right) - could you back that up with a link or somethign?

onceler - link1, link2 etc...........
 
Yurt said:
you're not responding with any respect. if you had any respect, you would answer my questions and rationally discuss what you claim i said is incorrect or a lie.

you feel "compelled to respond"....really? then why don't you actually DEFEND your claims? when people respond to false claims about them, they don't normally cop out. they actually try and show they are telling the truth. you............nah............just make the claim and hope all your buddies believe it. i can do that too, though i prefer providing evidence of my claims, but with you, you never do.

this how you make claims:

onceler - X is a liar. the above statement is not correct. thats not true. you can't read.

Y poster - could you back that up with a link or something?

onceler - no. believe it because i said it. just read the thread. i can't prove it, just read the thread.

A poster (whom onceler knows he is right) - could you back that up with a link or somethign?

onceler - link1, link2 etc...........
Click to expand...

I have to respectfully thank you; in a thread overflowing w/ examples, you have provided yet another. It is appreciated.
 
Onceler said:
I have to respectfully thank you; in a thread overflowing w/ examples, you have provided yet another. It is appreciated.
Click to expand...

and you talk about weird.....you could have ended this a dozen posts ago by simply pointing out what specifically i said was dishonest or not correct.

but you didn't. because you want to continue your attacks on me. you don't want to stop the attacks. if you did and actually obeyed SF, you would stop the hiding, provide evidence of your claims and provide support. which would be a rational discussion. so i guess you lied to SF as well.

pity, i thought maybe he broke through.
 
Yurt said:
and you talk about weird.....you could have ended this a dozen posts ago by simply pointing out what specifically i said was dishonest or not correct.

but you didn't. because you want to continue your attacks on me. you don't want to stop the attacks. if you did and actually obeyed SF, you would stop the hiding, provide evidence of your claims and provide support. which would be a rational discussion. so i guess you lied to SF as well.

pity, i thought maybe he broke through.
Click to expand...

Respectfully, this could have ended dozens of posts ago if you weren't so obsessive. I said I'd leave you alone, but you found some need to continue.

Let's just start w/ the obsessiveness; on that, you are clearly incorrect. Answer me this one: of the 2 of us...who has started more threads about the other, who has neg repped more, who has put the other in their signature, who obsessively brings the other up in threads where he hasn't even posted?

And who kept this conversation going in ridiculous fashion after the other basically said he'd leave him alone?

Respectfully, I would ask you to be honest as you answer these questions. This is merely addressing the question about obsessiveness; we can move onto others after that, if you still would like to....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top