Sarah Palin

Damocles said:
Anyway, this is what somebody who would actually have a horse in the race had to say about it:

"The term “blood libel” has taken on a broad metaphorical meaning in public discourse. Although its historical origins were in theologically based false accusations against the Jews and the Jewish People,its current usage is far broader. I myself have used it to describe false accusations against the State of Israel by the Goldstone Report. There is nothing improper and certainly nothing anti-Semitic in Sarah Palin using the term to characterize what she reasonably believes are false accusations that her words or images may have caused a mentally disturbed individual to kill and maim. The fact that two of the victims are Jewish is utterly irrelevant to the propriety of using this widely used term."

http://biggovernment.com/publius/20...defends-sarah-palins-use-of-term-blood-libel/

I'd bet he found it ironic to be defending Sarah.
Click to expand...

Why would you find it ironic....can't believe a Jew can be objective and honest?

This kinda refutes your post right before this one doesn't it....

What possible, even imaginary reason or proof can you come up with that would show Sarah Palin was not perfectly familiar with the term "blood libel" and used it to perfection in defending herself?

It fits perfectly with what is happening to her with the insane wingnuts from the left trying to blame her for a killers actions.....
 
Palin 'hit with dishonesty bullets from .357 Magnum of unfairness'

SARAH Palin has hit out at her critics in the wake of the Tuscon shootings claiming they have fired at her 'with a semi-automatic hunting rifle of injustice'.

Mrs Palin has been criticised by some US commentators for continually using gun imagery in a way that - as they have made perfectly clear - would not have directly influenced the Arizona murders, but were certainly not designed to make people like each other.

But in a video posted on her Facebook page, the unofficial leader of America's Teapot movement hit back saying she had been 'sprayed with dishonesty bullets fired from the liberal media's .357 Magnum of unfairness and America-hating'.

She added: "I've spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and shooting my prayer shotgun at God and then waiting for him to return fire with exploding bullets of wisdom from his Heckler and Koch submachine gun of everlasting grace.

"I have listened, at first puzzled like a moose that's been hit in the leg, then with concern, like a moose that's been hit in the shoulder, and now with sadness, like a baby moose whose mother I've just shot.

"Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own, like a brave American hunter on a lonely hillside, staring down the crosshairs of his beautifully polished Remington 750 Woodmaster as he waits patiently for something to kill."

Getting weird, Mrs Palin then said the US media had also accused her of murdering Jesus and drinking the blood of Christian children.

She continued: "How could I have killed Jesus? I'm only 46 and Jesus was born in like 3000 BC or something. And everyone knows I only drink moose blood."

Tom Logan, professor of politics at Reading University, said: "Mrs Palin has committed what is known as 'blood idiocy'.

"She has become so utterly cretinous that she is like the early Christians who wound up inside some lions because of their unshakeable belief in something that didn't exist."

Meanwhile Mrs Palin has vowed to take the fight to her liberal opponents with a nationwide 'Truth Tour' where she will begin each event by firing 2000 rounds from a massive, belt-fed machine gun at a small piece of paper with the word 'lies' written on it.
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/...from-.357-magnum-of-unfairness'-201101133427/
 
Dixie said:
Someone should teach those morons how to spell "Tucson" ...right, LowIQ?
Click to expand...

I have been trying to teach people to say this for Tucson dees. One lad volunteeered to make a desk we could use. I got the wood and he said, 'Akansas'.
Terrible! Bring back Perry Como.
 
Lowaicue said:
There is little point in continuing this, Dixie. If you spin any more you will have to change your name to Dizzy.
Click to expand...

I understand your wanting to drop this and move along, I don't blame you. The more you look at the facts, the more stupid and ridiculous your conclusions become. The more you try to falsely tie this to 'right wing rhetoric' or anything related to Sarah Palin, the more America's stomach turns and you lose more credibility. I am enjoying the hell out of watching you retards try to form and mold a political football out of a steaming pile of horseshit...how long will it be before we hear... Well... we only made those claims because the right made us! We were tricked and duped by Karl Rove... Dupnik was obviously a teabagger plant, designed to set us up... I can almost hear the excuses now, when you guys realize how much of a failure this thing has become for you. It's ALMOST enough to make me feel sorry for you.
 
Jarod said:
I would have known better than to use the term, and Im not ever considering a run for any political office.

She is simply unknoledgable about the world.
Click to expand...

So you're saying that while you wouldn't have used that specific word, you will use words like "unknoledgable".
How ironic.
 
Dixie said:
That's odd, I just pulled up her Wikipedia page, and it doesn't even mention her love of guns. It says she is famous for being McCain's running mate in 2008, for being the first female VP candidate of the Republican party, for being Governor of Alaska, for being an accomplished author, for being mayor of Wasilla, for heading the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.... not a word about her being famous for loving guns!! You'd think a comprehensive biography would include such information... odd.
Click to expand...

Check Charver’s post, msg. 102. “But in a video posted on her Facebook page, the unofficial leader of America's Teapot movement hit back saying she had been 'sprayed with dishonesty bullets fired from the liberal media's .357 Magnum of unfairness and America-hating'.

She added: "I've spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and shooting my prayer shotgun at God and then waiting for him to return fire with exploding bullets of wisdom from his Heckler and Koch submachine gun of everlasting grace.”

"Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own, like a brave American hunter on a lonely hillside, staring down the crosshairs of his beautifully polished Remington 750 Woodmaster as he waits patiently for something to kill."

Who would use gun metaphors to that degree other than one fixated on guns?

Furthermore, the message goes on the read, “Getting weird, Mrs Palin then said the US media had also accused her of murdering Jesus and drinking the blood of Christian children.

She continued: "How could I have killed Jesus? I'm only 46 and Jesus was born in like 3000 BC or something. And everyone knows I only drink moose blood."

Does that sound like a normal response from a mature adult or more appropriate to one who suffers from arrested development?

Well, maybe we should ban 'shoot em up' computer games! I wouldn't want some kid to see those, and go mow down a bunch of dignitaries!
Click to expand...

Even kids can tell the difference between computer games and what a politician writes on their web page. The question is, "Can you?"

The symbols used, are geological survey symbols, commonly used all the time on maps to denote places of interest, Palin used them on a map, to denote places of interest. Is that some kind of 'illogical conclusion' in your mind?
Click to expand...

If they were there to represent geological survey symbols why were they removed?

I'm sure she didn't mean "shot" either... she didn't even mean "cross hair" ...she used a commonly used geological marking, found in thousands and thousands of maps of all different kinds across the globe... She could have used a star... the insane man could have had a thing about stars... what difference does any of this make? He didn't go on a shooting rampage because Sarah Palin used a geological marking on a fucking map! MORON!
Click to expand...

The woman who was shot, Giffords, mentioned the cross hairs prior to the incident.

Have you ever heard of certain types of visual stimuli bringing on convulsions in susceptible people? Do you think billboards showing such stimuli would be permitted on highways? If not, why not? Why should society be restricted due to "ill" people, people whose brains work differently?

Fuck you... be honest with YOURSELF, pinhead! You, and the liberal left, saw an opportunity to bash Sarah Palin, and once again, you took it! Problem is, this time, you stepped way over the bounds of decency and America is responding to that. You're over in the UK, so you aren't aware of how this is playing here... by next weekend, you won't be able to find a pinhead anywhere, who is even mentioning this anymore, because public sentiment is not on your side, this isn't helping your cause one bit.
Click to expand...

Public sentiment is on our side. Whether it be a Sheriff speaking out about the dangers of political rhetoric to the removal of images from Palin's web page obviously they know something is wrong.

The discussion is not whether Palin killed the Senator. Obviously, she didn't. The discussion is regarding violent, political rhetoric and images which can be used in an ambiguous fashion. In other words, civility.

Do try and grasp the bigger concept.
 
Is it a question of blame?

Or is it a recognition that the possibility exists that some people may commit crimes if they believe influential political figures endorse those actions?
 
apple0154 said:
Check Charver’s post, msg. 102. “But in a video posted on her Facebook page, the unofficial leader of America's Teapot movement hit back saying she had been 'sprayed with dishonesty bullets fired from the liberal media's .357 Magnum of unfairness and America-hating'.

She added: "I've spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and shooting my prayer shotgun at God and then waiting for him to return fire with exploding bullets of wisdom from his Heckler and Koch submachine gun of everlasting grace.”

"Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own, like a brave American hunter on a lonely hillside, staring down the crosshairs of his beautifully polished Remington 750 Woodmaster as he waits patiently for something to kill."

Who would use gun metaphors to that degree other than one fixated on guns?

Furthermore, the message goes on the read, “Getting weird, Mrs Palin then said the US media had also accused her of murdering Jesus and drinking the blood of Christian children.

She continued: "How could I have killed Jesus? I'm only 46 and Jesus was born in like 3000 BC or something. And everyone knows I only drink moose blood."

Does that sound like a normal response from a mature adult or more appropriate to one who suffers from arrested development?
Click to expand...

You fucking idiot, that is a SPOOF from the UK equivalent to THE ONION!

Are you THAT much of a complete DUMBASS?

Even kids can tell the difference between computer games and what a politician writes on their web page. The question is, "Can you?"
Click to expand...

Not if I were as fucking pathetically STOOPID as YOU! Hell, it's a fucking miracle an idiot of your caliber is even alive! You must live in a goddamn bubble! Are you the Boy in the Bubble? zOMG!

If they were there to represent geological survey symbols why were they removed?
Click to expand...

Because drooling brain-dead morons like you started yammering stoopidity about it, and she thought it might be in good taste to take it down. She didn't put it up to "invoke violence" or any of this other load of absolute SHIT you are trying to dump on her!

The woman who was shot, Giffords, mentioned the cross hairs prior to the incident.
Click to expand...

Big Fucking Deal! Did the surveyor's marks shoot her? Do you have ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Loughner even KNEW about this? Or is this more BRILLIANT analysis from The Boy in The Bubble?

Have you ever heard of certain types of visual stimuli bringing on convulsions in susceptible people? Do you think billboards showing such stimuli would be permitted on highways? If not, why not? Why should society be restricted due to "ill" people, people whose brains work differently?
Click to expand...

Yeah, I am getting a slight twitch in my eyebrow as I read your moronic drivel! It just continues to get more pathetic and more STOOPID! I keep thinking it will reach a bottom point, but it just keeps going, more and more STOOPID with every sentence you type! It's a good thing you live in the bubble!

Public sentiment is on our side. Whether it be a Sheriff speaking out about the dangers of political rhetoric to the removal of images from Palin's web page obviously they know something is wrong.

The discussion is not whether Palin killed the Senator. Obviously, she didn't. The discussion is regarding violent, political rhetoric and images which can be used in an ambiguous fashion. In other words, civility.

Do try and grasp the bigger concept.
Click to expand...

Dupnik is a PINHEAD... the NAME says it all!

Yes BubbleBoy... it's obvious Sarah Palin didn't kill the Senator... OBVIOUSLY! Gabrielle Giffords is a US Representative, not a Senator, and she is quite alive in a Tucson hospital at this time, the victim of a gunshot wound to the head from a 9mm Glock, fired by Jarred Loughner at close range. He did kill a Federal Judge, as well as a 9-year-old little girl, and several others.

President Obama gave a great speech the other night, I know you probably didn't get to catch it in your Bubble... but he stated rather clearly and specifically, that political rhetoric and civility in discourse, ---did not--- cause this tragedy. Let me repeat it for you... DID NOT... as in, DID and NOT... do you comprehend that, STOOPID? If either of those two words are a problem, we can maybe find someone to teach them to you.

So now... here is what we're going to do, Bubble Boy...

We are going to drop the nonsense about this tragedy being political or having anything to do with the right, Sarah Palin, the Tea Party, or our 'tone of rhetoric'. ANY attempts by the liberal left, to make a power grab for freedoms and rights here, and you are going to pay a high cost politically for that. Virtually NO ONE, including Obama, is going to be on your side.
 
Dixie said:
Virtually NO ONE, including Obama, is going to be on your side.
Click to expand...

Wrong!

Palin took the cross hairs off her web site. Because she thought it might be in good taste? Why? What has good taste got to do with geological markings?

You're losing it, Dixie. You're illogical. If no one felt the cross hairs represented anything wrong why would anyone even think about it?

The reality is people did associate the cross hairs with targets, enough people to cause Palin to remove them.

Talking about bubbles I humbly suggest you get off the computer and out of your parent's basement. The dampness is affecting your ability to draw logical conclusions.


//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Dixie said:
You fucking idiot, that is a SPOOF from the UK equivalent to THE ONION!

Are you THAT much of a complete DUMBASS?



Not if I were as fucking pathetically STOOPID as YOU! Hell, it's a fucking miracle an idiot of your caliber is even alive! You must live in a goddamn bubble! Are you the Boy in the Bubble? zOMG!



Because drooling brain-dead morons like you started yammering stoopidity about it, and she thought it might be in good taste to take it down. She didn't put it up to "invoke violence" or any of this other load of absolute SHIT you are trying to dump on her!



Big Fucking Deal! Did the surveyor's marks shoot her? Do you have ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that Loughner even KNEW about this? Or is this more BRILLIANT analysis from The Boy in The Bubble?



Yeah, I am getting a slight twitch in my eyebrow as I read your moronic drivel! It just continues to get more pathetic and more STOOPID! I keep thinking it will reach a bottom point, but it just keeps going, more and more STOOPID with every sentence you type! It's a good thing you live in the bubble!



Dupnik is a PINHEAD... the NAME says it all!

Yes BubbleBoy... it's obvious Sarah Palin didn't kill the Senator... OBVIOUSLY! Gabrielle Giffords is a US Representative, not a Senator, and she is quite alive in a Tucson hospital at this time, the victim of a gunshot wound to the head from a 9mm Glock, fired by Jarred Loughner at close range. He did kill a Federal Judge, as well as a 9-year-old little girl, and several others.

President Obama gave a great speech the other night, I know you probably didn't get to catch it in your Bubble... but he stated rather clearly and specifically, that political rhetoric and civility in discourse, ---did not--- cause this tragedy. Let me repeat it for you... DID NOT... as in, DID and NOT... do you comprehend that, STOOPID? If either of those two words are a problem, we can maybe find someone to teach them to you.

So now... here is what we're going to do, Bubble Boy...

We are going to drop the nonsense about this tragedy being political or having anything to do with the right, Sarah Palin, the Tea Party, or our 'tone of rhetoric'. ANY attempts by the liberal left, to make a power grab for freedoms and rights here, and you are going to pay a high cost politically for that. Virtually NO ONE, including Obama, is going to be on your side.
Click to expand...
 
apple0154 said:
Wrong!

Palin took the cross hairs off her web site. Because she thought it might be in good taste? Why? What has good taste got to do with geological markings?

You're losing it, Dixie. You're illogical. If no one felt the cross hairs represented anything wrong why would anyone even think about it?

The reality is people did associate the cross hairs with targets, enough people to cause Palin to remove them.

Talking about bubbles I humbly suggest you get off the computer and out of your parent's basement. The dampness is affecting your ability to draw logical conclusions.


//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Click to expand...

Do you think it might be possible that she removed the image from her website out of respect?
 
apple0154 said:
Wrong!

Palin took the cross hairs off her web site. Because she thought it might be in good taste? Why? What has good taste got to do with geological markings?

You're losing it, Dixie. You're illogical. If no one felt the cross hairs represented anything wrong why would anyone even think about it?

The reality is people did associate the cross hairs with targets, enough people to cause Palin to remove them.

Talking about bubbles I humbly suggest you get off the computer and out of your parent's basement. The dampness is affecting your ability to draw logical conclusions.


//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Click to expand...

If the reality is (as you say), people did associate cross hairs with targets, then couldn't they have also associated surveyor's marks with cross hairs? Would that be considered an "illogical conclusion" to you?

The reason they would think about it is this thing called the Internet... Email... comment posts at their website... new technology is AMAZING! When people complained (and I know this is difficult to comprehend) they took the 'offending' thing down. Kind of like, when people complained to the NY Times about omitting part of Obama's speech, they added it. I know, right?

It's okay, you don't have to make the 'parents basement' remarks, I understand you are sensitive about living in your bubble... maybe one day they will let you out, Bubble Boy!
 
Dixie said:
If the reality is (as you say), people did associate cross hairs with targets, then couldn't they have also associated surveyor's marks with cross hairs? Would that be considered an "illogical conclusion" to you?

The reason they would think about it is this thing called the Internet... Email... comment posts at their website... new technology is AMAZING! When people complained (and I know this is difficult to comprehend) they took the 'offending' thing down. Kind of like, when people complained to the NY Times about omitting part of Obama's speech, they added it. I know, right?

It's okay, you don't have to make the 'parents basement' remarks, I understand you are sensitive about living in your bubble... maybe one day they will let you out, Bubble Boy!
Click to expand...

Here's Palin's own Tweet, where she refers to the alleged "surveyor's marks" as "Bulleyes":

http://twitpic.com/3ofie7/full
 
Palin took the cross hairs off her web site. Because she thought it might be in good taste? Why? What has good taste got to do with geological markings?
Click to expand...

It's really difficult to explain "good taste" to an idiot pinhead, but I shall try...

It's like that effigy of Bush you have hanging on your back porch... If Bush were lynched and hung, people would come by and see your effigy, and since you are retarded and spend most of your days with tempera paints and paper mache, your effigy is easily recognized as being Bush. Now, if enough people said something to you about it, you might start thinking... hmmm, maybe I should take this down for a while, so people don't think I was meaning something by this that I never intended... is that comprehensible to you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top