Why was Boehner not at memoral?

Right. You "felt" that way because you agreed with the sentiment.

Then what was this from you? you can do it, but it becomes childlike when I do? ahahaha, sorry daddy!
I didn't "only" say that now, did I? Really dig in to that post and you'll notice that I actually pointed out things in the post that had nothing to do with you.

Thanks Rana, your point was clear but again it was off target. Let's really dig in to what I am saying.

Continuing the same incorrect theme isn't "leadership" it is following. Leadership would have brought us to a whole new direction. Instead we just got more of the same just stated with more flowery speech. He jumped in front of a parade that had already turned off of Main Street and was on its way out of town.
 
Oh, okay, thus declared the high Lord Damo!

I bow to your superior reasoning and your superior opinion.
 
I have been meaning to ask you just what you thought Obama should say at the event? What would you have said different? How would you have united this country?

Everyone complains about his eulogy, but no one offers what they would have said.

The speech was well-received by right and left. Only hacks are nitpicking it to this extent. It's one of the reasons I don't see things changing anytime soon.
 
Not to sound callous, but what purpose does "reflecting on the lives lost" serve going forward? And I can argue that you can do that, and still talk about the rhetoric.

I will say right now: the rhetoric, in my view, had NOTHING to do with this tragedy. This guy was clearly a nutter, and wired for an action like this.

That said, if there is one positive thing to come out of this, it's that people are taking a look at how out of hand things have gotten in this country, and how polarized we really have become. If this had nothing to do w/ the event, it certainly played a part in the aftermath.

To ignore that wouldn't be "leadership," imo. You take that moment, and see if you can work something more positive out for the future.

except to you its not positive when i post violent rhetoric from the left.

if you want true change, all rhetoric needs to tone down...you can't just choose to be passionate about rhetoric that comes from your political opponents. you need to be able to say how wrong the left was this past weekend for blaming or trying to blame the right within minutes.
 
except to you its not positive when i post violent rhetoric from the left.

if you want true change, all rhetoric needs to tone down...you can't just choose to be passionate about rhetoric that comes from your political opponents. you need to be able to say how wrong the left was this past weekend for blaming or trying to blame the right within minutes.

Good lord - the "fairness doctrine" guy strikes again. Where is the left now? Huh? Huh?

Idiot - how many times do I have to say on this board that the reaction against Palin was completely unwarranted & over-the-top? Did Obama single out rightie rhetoric, because that's what we were talking about before you came in here w/ the usual "where are lefties...huh? Huh?" routine.

God, how predictable.
 
Good lord - the "fairness doctrine" guy strikes again. Where is the left now? Huh? Huh?

Idiot - how many times do I have to say on this board that the reaction against Palin was completely unwarranted & over-the-top? Did Obama single out rightie rhetoric, because that's what we were talking about before you came in here w/ the usual "where are lefties...huh? Huh?" routine.

God, how predictable.

and not at all surprising, you refuse to condemn the hysteria by the left last weekend in trying to or actually blaming right wing rhetoric for the shootings...

until you can, you will be part of the problem, not the solution
 
and not at all surprising, you refuse to condemn the hysteria by the left last weekend in trying to or actually blaming right wing rhetoric for the shootings...

until you can, you will be part of the problem, not the solution

I just did, idiot. For about the dozenth time.

What a complete moron...
 
Back
Top