So much for the gov't takeover of GM

seriously, stfu with your lies

i wasn't fear mongering at all

it isn't government owned and run...lmao...that is a bald face lie

LOL

I just checked Dixie's "socialism" thread from a year ago. Again - I can bump it if you want. You were screaming about how the gov't controlled the means of production & ran GM.

This story is pretty bad egg in the fact for you, unfortunately...
 
LOL

I just checked Dixie's "socialism" thread from a year ago. Again - I can bump it if you want. You were screaming about how the gov't controlled the means of production & ran GM.

This story is pretty bad egg in the fact for you, unfortunately...

bump it...because voicing my opinion against it is not the same as fear mongering you dishonest hack

and i'm laughing at your bald face lie that the government does not own gm...again, from you link:

With this stock offering, GM doesn't rid itself of government intervention. The government remains a big shareholder.

good lord, you're the dumbest liar around :)
 
You were one of the biggest fearmongers about the "socialist takeover."

Sorry that GM is doing well & clearly NOT gov't owned & run; hope that's not too disappointing for you...

With this stock offering, GM doesn't rid itself of government intervention. The government remains a big shareholder.
 
It's absolutely absurd at this point to say that the gov't is "running" GM. The height of desperation.

lol...you said OWNED and run...as the largest shareholder, yes, they do in fact run gm

see bus 101

i wonder if you'll for the first time admit you were wrong that the government does not OWN gm
 
I bet Mott is not buying the stock.
I'll buy it when it's cheaper than toilet paper, cause that's what the socialist think you should get for your capital invested. Shit
 
LOL

I just checked Dixie's "socialism" thread from a year ago. Again - I can bump it if you want. You were screaming about how the gov't controlled the means of production & ran GM.

This story is pretty bad egg in the fact for you, unfortunately...

still waiting for that bump so we can see another of your crazy lies today

first it was the government doesn't own gm...then it was they don't run gm, despite obama saying they will exercise their rights regarding fundamental decisions as the majority shareholder....and he hasn't yet said that is no longer true

this is fun :clink:
 
lol...you said OWNED and run...as the largest shareholder, yes, they do in fact run gm

see bus 101

i wonder if you'll for the first time admit you were wrong that the government does not OWN gm

They own SHARES of GM. As they promised at the beginning of this, they are pulling out, and the bailout was a temporary measure to get GM back on it's feet.

It wasn't the "incremental creep" toward full ownership & socialism that you & Dixie were fervently warning everyone about a year ago. Like I said - you were wrong. Are you able to admit that?

Doubt it. The gov't is not running GM.
 
They own SHARES of GM. As they promised at the beginning of this, they are pulling out, and the bailout was a temporary measure to get GM back on it's feet.

It wasn't the "incremental creep" toward full ownership & socialism that you & Dixie were fervently warning everyone about a year ago. Like I said - you were wrong. Are you able to admit that?

Doubt it. The gov't is not running GM.

bump that thread you liar...i wasn't fear mongering, i said they should be allowed to fail...bump it so we can see another of your lies

and i'm not surprised you won't admit you lied that the government does NOT own gm...they still own 61%, even when they go down to 30%, that is still a HUGE ownership

obama said they would exercise their rights as shareholders....he has not recanted this
 
They own SHARES of GM. As they promised at the beginning of this, they are pulling out, and the bailout was a temporary measure to get GM back on it's feet.

It wasn't the "incremental creep" toward full ownership & socialism that you & Dixie were fervently warning everyone about a year ago. Like I said - you were wrong. Are you able to admit that?

Doubt it. The gov't is not running GM.
This nit-picking is getting more ridiculous by the day....60% of GM was OWNED by the US Government....60% is control....control means, "we run the company"....and as proof, Obama even fired the old CEO....I'd guess when you can fire the CEO of a company, you're running it...now get over it.
 
This nit-picking is getting more ridiculous by the day....60% of GM was OWNED by the US Government....60% is control....control means, "we run the company"....and as proof, Obama even fired the old CEO....I'd guess when you can fire the CEO of a company, you're running it...now get over it.

You capped the wrong word. You should have capped WAS, not owned.

The gov't doesn't have a 60% share anymore; as we told you, the bailout was a temporary measure, intended to preserve one of our few real manufacturing bases. It worked, and now - as we told you - the gov't is pulling out, and GM is doing well on its own.

Sorry that the whole thing worked. Like I told Yurt, it must be incredibly disappointing for you guys to see all of those jobs saved....
 
so... if someone owns a 33% share of something , that means that they "own" it?

Or are you suggesting that, simply because the government owns shares of GM, that makes them "owners"? Using that standard, I own GM.

yes preacher....

right now they still own 61%, that means they are the majority SH and have the largest say...and obama demonstrated his ability to fire teh CEO...hmmmm...thats more control than you have

now go read up on what a shareholder is and stop embarrassing yourself

edit....they have about 36% now....
 
Last edited:
You capped the wrong word. You should have capped WAS, not owned.

The gov't doesn't have a 60% share anymore; as we told you, the bailout was a temporary measure, intended to preserve one of our few real manufacturing bases. It worked, and now - as we told you - the gov't is pulling out, and GM is doing well on its own.

Sorry that the whole thing worked. Like I told Yurt, it must be incredibly disappointing for you guys to see all of those jobs saved....

but the government does NOT own gm....LOLOLOLOL

obama has not recanted his power that he controls fundamental corporate decisions and he still has teh power to fire a CEO

but thats not ownership or control

lmao

and where is that thread, i think you realized how you lied and that is why you have run from claiming you will bump the thread

today just isn't your day :)
 
but the government does NOT own gm....LOLOLOLOL

obama has not recanted his power that he controls fundamental corporate decisions and he still has teh power to fire a CEO

but thats not ownership or control

lmao

and where is that thread, i think you realized how you lied and that is why you have run from claiming you will bump the thread

today just isn't your day :)

It's painfully intellectually dishonest of you to try to still make a "socialism" argument based on what's happening now. I understand that you've had a rough, rough week, though.

Again, I find myself feeling a little bit sorry for you.

But, it's also funny; I can't disregard that aspect of it...
 
It's painfully intellectually dishonest of you to try to still make a "socialism" argument based on what's happening now. I understand that you've had a rough, rough week, though.

Again, I find myself feeling a little bit sorry for you.

But, it's also funny; I can't disregard that aspect of it...

the lies keep coming...i haven't once said anything about socialism today

btw...why are you afraid to bump that thread that you claim i was fear mongering?

and once again:

the government does not own gm....lolololol

they are a majority sh and obama said they will use that power to make fundamental corp decisions and that apparently goes so far as to include controlling who the CEO is
 
You capped the wrong word. You should have capped WAS, not owned.

The gov't doesn't have a 60% share anymore; as we told you, the bailout was a temporary measure, intended to preserve one of our few real manufacturing bases. It worked, and now - as we told you - the gov't is pulling out, and GM is doing well on its own.

Sorry that the whole thing worked. Like I told Yurt, it must be incredibly disappointing for you guys to see all of those jobs saved....
Is this your desperation post in lieu of admitting you were wrong again..???

its as inane and desperate as MM's nonsense post"
so... if someone owns a 33% share of something , that means that they "own" it?

Or are you suggesting that, simply because the government owns shares of GM, that makes them "owners"? Using that standard, I own GM.
Let me explain it MM....If you own 33% share of something, thats what you own....33%....if thats more shares than anyone else, it makes you a person that can't be ignored, but not quite enough to give the orders...
If you'd have owned 66%, you are in fact the man that controls the company, you have in fact the power to give orders....if doesn't make you the sole owner and no one claimed anything like that about GM and the government....and even it they did, for all "practical" purposes it is true.
Just as the word "owned" is used on the internet....get it snipe?...
 
Last edited:
Is this your desperation post in lieu of admitting you were wrong again..???

its as inane and desperate as MM's nonsense post"


Let me explain it MM....If you own 33% share of something, thats what you own....33%....if thats the more shares than anyone else, it makes you a person that can't be ignored, but not quite enough to give the orders...
If you'd have owned 66%, you are in fact the man that controls the company, you have in fact the power to give orders....if doesn't make you the sole owner and no one claimed anything like that about GM and the government....and even it they did, for all "practical" purposes it is true.
Just as the word "owned" is used on the internet....get it snipe?...

I am not this mm fellow,and you seem to agree with me. 33% doesn't give you control of anything. it certainly doesn't make you the "owner".
 
Ahhhh....so now we go to "can't be ignored" from actually having the "ability to give orders."

Which is what I said - they don't own & run GM

And Yurt thanked that post from bravo, too - so he's now admitting that they don't run GM.

LOL
 
Back
Top