The best justice MONEY CAN BUY!

How did this become a liberal/conservative thing? I get the point of the OP about rich and the non-rich (although it is not something new).
 
How did this become a liberal/conservative thing? I get the point of the OP about rich and the non-rich (although it is not something new).

read bgdork's last sentence in the OP....the hack will turn anything, even non political, into a political insult fest....amazing, truly amazing
 
Unless he is the District Attorney then your statement was false. Nobody here has attempted to justify anything whether or not they are "conservative". So far Yurt has simply pointed out to you attempting to excuse yourself for an action of employment isn't the same thing as justifying another's actions.

Vail Valley District Attorney Mark Hurlbert plans to announce Thursday he is running for the Colorado State Senate seat currently held by Democrat Dan Gibbs, representing Clear Creek, Boulder, Gilpin, Grand, Jefferson and Summit counties.

Hurlbert, a Republican, currently is the chief prosecutor in the District Attorney's office in the Fifth Judicial District.
http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20100113/NEWS/100119822/1078&ParentProfile=1062

DA Mark Hurlbert Charges Two Top Women Mountain Bike Racers with Felony Criminal Impersonation for Using False Racer Number in Leadville Competition: Snowball DA Strikes Again – UPDATED
Posted on May 8, 2010 by Laura Victoria* 15 Comments

DA Mark Hurlbert filed felony criminal-impersonation charges against two veteran Vail, Colorado, mountain bike racers, Wendy Lyall and Katie Brazelton, after an injured Brazelton, 40, gave her registration materials and entry number to her friend, Lyall, 36, so she could race in the 2009 Leadville Mountain Trail 100 .

http://abusivediscretion.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/da-mark-hurlbert-charges-two-top-women-mountain-bike-racers-with-felony-criminal-impersonation-for-using-false-bib-number-in-leadville-trail-100-competition-snowball-prosecutor-strikes-again/
 
cute...when you finally realize you're wrong...CHANGE your stance...unfortunately for you your words are still there in black and white:



simply stated....no one has justified the moron's actions...but you staphagetard ignorantly cling to your false notions

The scum bag DA is a Republican.

Endorsement from Senator Josh Penry

March 10, 2010
Mark Hurlbert is a leader: a husband, a dad, and a prosecutor who knows what he believes and knows how to get the job done. And Mark knows that business-as-usual in government needs to stop, and he’s got the guts, the know-how and the conservative principles to fight for what’s right.
 
Well, the second post was about "conservatives" it progressed from there.

And any old opportunity to slam a conservative cannot go by.

If Mother Theresa was a conservative and passed gas they would be all over this like a wet overcoat about the partisanship of it all!
 
Zappapatoot-sky is on a roll...

Well actually Zap is ALWAYS on a roll!!! :palm:

Because you won't accept PM's, here's my response to your PM to me.

Take me to task in public, I welcome it. Give me your best shot, and I will do the same. That is what the board is about, having the courage to stand up for what you believe, not throw stones from a hiding place. I consider your neg reps the act of a coward.
 
dumb question....but the answer is...it is against the law

answer me this:

do DA's hand out misdemeanors for not breaking the law?

No they don't.

Now let's see what constitutes a misdemeamor...me and some friends were spending a weekend in Vegas. One of my buddies had a few too many "free beers" the casinos offered and was loudly "serenading' the public as we walked from one casino to the next. We were stopped and told if we didn't quiet my buddy down, he'd get charged with MISDEMEANOR PUBLIC INTOXICATION.

Most sane people would conclude that the offense committed by that inattentive driver rose to a much higher level than being bothered by an annoying drunk's off key vocal stylings.
 
Because you won't accept PM's, here's my response to your PM to me.

Take me to task in public, I welcome it. Give me your best shot, and I will do the same. That is what the board is about, having the courage to stand up for what you believe, not throw stones from a hiding place. I consider your neg reps the act of a coward.

But you're the coward; for refusing to address the Tofu Buger Kid's Meal, on a different thread.
 
Because you won't accept PM's, here's my response to your PM to me.

Take me to task in public, I welcome it. Give me your best shot, and I will do the same. That is what the board is about, having the courage to stand up for what you believe, not throw stones from a hiding place. I consider your neg reps the act of a coward.

You've got to understand...disloyal is just too gutless to say what she's got to say out here where everyone can see...if she did that, then everyone would see her for the filth slinging harridan she truly is.
 
And any old opportunity to slam a conservative cannot go by.

If Mother Theresa was a conservative and passed gas they would be all over this like a wet overcoat about the partisanship of it all!

Listen little girl, I've been around since the days when liberals ran this country, and I've witnessed what 30+ years of conservative dominated politics and government has led to.

A police state that locks up more human beings than China and Russia, a middle class that is almost extinct and a bunch of right wing authoritarians running the Republican party.

PAY ATTENTION...you won't have to look very far on this board to find 'conservatives' constantly defend the wealthy and elite, and to go even farther, they will demean and diminish the poor.
 
You've got to understand...disloyal is just too gutless to say what she's got to say out here where everyone can see...if she did that, then everyone would see her for the filth slinging harridan she truly is.

But then, you must be describing yourself; because it does seem that you're the one who wants to threaten people, using PM's.

Face it zap; you're just a big ole gurl and it explains the sorry state your life is in.
 
Listen little girl, I've been around since the days when liberals ran this country, and I've witnessed what 30+ years of conservative dominated politics and government has led to.

A police state that locks up more human beings than China and Russia, a middle class that is almost extinct and a bunch of right wing authoritarians running the Republican party.

PAY ATTENTION...you won't have to look very far on this board to find 'conservatives' constantly defend the wealthy and elite, and to go even farther, they will demean and diminish the poor.

If you're trying to promote that you're old enough to know better, then start acting like it.

Go have a Happy Meal.
 
In this case, this gentleman probably has enough in savings to pay any litigation amount this guy could win. First make him pay reparations, then send him to prison after he has fulfilled his obligation to the life he has destroyed.
 
In this case, this gentleman probably has enough in savings to pay any litigation amount this guy could win. First make him pay reparations, then send him to prison after he has fulfilled his obligation to the life he has destroyed.

In this, I agree.
 
No they don't.

Now let's see what constitutes a misdemeamor...me and some friends were spending a weekend in Vegas. One of my buddies had a few too many "free beers" the casinos offered and was loudly "serenading' the public as we walked from one casino to the next. We were stopped and told if we didn't quiet my buddy down, he'd get charged with MISDEMEANOR PUBLIC INTOXICATION.

Most sane people would conclude that the offense committed by that inattentive driver rose to a much higher level than being bothered by an annoying drunk's off key vocal stylings.

people take convictions all the time that are below their actual crimes....sheesh zappa, you're just being plain dumb here....

the DA convicted him for a crime, the conviction was a lesser amount that was completely within the DA's discretion and within the law....you may not agree with his decision to have the guy get a lesser conviction, but he did not in any way shape or form justify the guys actions...he gave him the lesser charege because he believed it would result in a larger monetary punishment....too bad you don't like that justice, but in the end, the DA gave him what he thought was appropriate justice
 
But you're the coward; for refusing to address the Tofu Buger Kid's Meal, on a different thread.

I did...I told you I took your word for it.

Why won't you answer a simple and straight forward question, instead of posing a goofy 'Tofu Buger Kid's Meal' challenge?

You want government to stay our of our lives and keep their hands off corporations, does that include no inspection and regulation of our food supply?
 
people take convictions all the time that are below their actual crimes....sheesh zappa, you're just being plain dumb here....

the DA convicted him for a crime, the conviction was a lesser amount that was completely within the DA's discretion and within the law....you may not agree with his decision to have the guy get a lesser conviction, but he did not in any way shape or form justify the guys actions...he gave him the lesser charege because he believed it would result in a larger monetary punishment....too bad you don't like that justice, but in the end, the DA gave him what he thought was appropriate justice

Sure he did...he justified the reduction of charges by claiming the criminal needed to keep working to better pay for any financial obligations.

The DA in Vail just established precedent to allow ANY rich criminal to avoid conviction/jail on the basis that he can better "pay his debt" if he can continue working.

The bottom line is the hit & run driver will suffer no hardship whatsoever.

He won't endure any financial hardship since he can continue to work while living in his spacious home and he also avoids the physical hardships that jail can inflict.

The bottom line is he avoids doing any jail time for a crime that, if you or I were to commit it, would certainly result n SUBSTANTIAL jail time.
 
I did...I told you I took your word for it.

Why won't you answer a simple and straight forward question, instead of posing a goofy 'Tofu Buger Kid's Meal' challenge?

You want government to stay our of our lives and keep their hands off corporations, does that include no inspection and regulation of our food supply?

Care to direct me to the thread where you finally agreed that it's not the TOY?

Why don't you start another thread, if you want to spin things in a direction you're more comfortable with??
 
Sure he did...he justified the reduction of charges by claiming the criminal needed to keep working to better pay for any financial obligations.

The DA in Vail just established precedent to allow ANY rich criminal to avoid conviction/jail on the basis that he can better "pay his debt" if he can continue working.

The bottom line is the hit & run driver will suffer no hardship whatsoever.

He won't endure any financial hardship since he can continue to work while living in his spacious home and he also avoids the physical hardships that jail can inflict.

The bottom line is he avoids doing any jail time for a crime that, if you or I were to commit it, would certainly result n SUBSTANTIAL jail time.

your ignorance is truly amazing

again, the DA did not justify his actions, if he did, then he would not have pressed charges for if the actions were justifiable, he wouldn't be prosecuted

the DA does not establish precedence...your knowledge of how the DA's office works is appalling...

saying he will not suffer any hardship is stupid
 
Back
Top