Sarah Palin is so stupid

Damn Yankee said:
You're trying to change the subject because you were called on calling Palin stupid because she told the truth.
Click to expand...

what are you talking about? read the first entry again. im calling her stupid for citing herself as an independent free thinker a sentence after she rips him for not voting lock step.. let me recap:

WASHINGTON – Sarah Palin said yesterday that while Massachusetts may “put up with” Senator Scott Brown, the conservatives in her home state of Alaska “wouldn’t stand for” him.

Palin, in an interview on Fox Business Network, was asked whether the Massachusetts Republican was “on notice” for siding with Democrats on several key votes.

“Well, you know, take the consideration, though, that that's Massachusetts,” Palin said. “Perhaps they’re not going to look for such a hard-core constitutional conservative there, and they're going to put up with Scott Brown and some of the antics there.”

“But up here in Alaska, and so many places in the US where we have a pioneering, independent spirit, and we have an expectation that our representatives in D.C. will respect the will of the people and the intelligence of the people,” she added. “Well, up here, we wouldn't stand for that.”
 
Chapdog said:
what are you talking about? read the first entry again. im calling her stupid for citing herself as an independent free thinker a sentence after she rips him for not voting lock step.. let me recap:

WASHINGTON – Sarah Palin said yesterday that while Massachusetts may “put up with” Senator Scott Brown, the conservatives in her home state of Alaska “wouldn’t stand for” him.

Palin, in an interview on Fox Business Network, was asked whether the Massachusetts Republican was “on notice” for siding with Democrats on several key votes.

“Well, you know, take the consideration, though, that that's Massachusetts,” Palin said. “Perhaps they’re not going to look for such a hard-core constitutional conservative there, and they're going to put up with Scott Brown and some of the antics there.”

“But up here in Alaska, and so many places in the US where we have a pioneering, independent spirit, and we have an expectation that our representatives in D.C. will respect the will of the people and the intelligence of the people,” she added. “Well, up here, we wouldn't stand for that.”
Click to expand...

Thats about as boneheaded as you can get....
Palin DID NOT say Brown shouldn't be an independent thinker, she did say she wasn't happy with his siding with the democrats on key issues....

and that voters in Alaska “wouldn’t stand for” it....

Thats perfectly logical and sound thinking in my book....

Being in 'lock step' with the opposition is hardly 'independent thinking' unless you're thinking like a liberal Democrat...and why the hell would Conservative republicans stand for that in any of their politicians...

You didn't see the Dims stand by Lieberman when he agreed with the republicans on any issues....

When you get to run any state as governor, or get your name on the ballot for VP, then tell me about how smart Palin is....shes obviously quite at bit more accomplished than you clowns, left or right, ever will be...
 
bravo said:
Thats about as boneheaded as you can get....
Palin DID NOT say Brown shouldn't be an independent thinker, she did say she wasn't happy with his siding with the democrats on key issues....

and that voters in Alaska “wouldn’t stand for” it....

Thats perfectly logical and sound thinking in my book....

Being in 'lock step' with the opposition is hardly 'independent thinking' unless you're thinking like a liberal Democrat...and why the hell would Conservative republicans stand for that in any of their politicians...

You didn't see the Dims stand by Lieberman when he agreed with the republicans on any issues....

When you get to run any state as governor, or get your name on the ballot for VP, then tell me about how smart Palin is....shes obviously quite at bit more accomplished than you clowns, left or right, ever will be...
Click to expand...

Palin wouldn't even make it a competitive race against Obama. The best bet for the republicans is Romney.

Id vote:
Palin: NO - loony
Mccain: NO - to old
Romney - Yes.. prob would win MA in general.
 
Chapdog said:
Palin wouldn't even make it a competitive race against Obama. The best bet for the republicans is Romney.

Id vote:
Palin: NO - loony
Mccain: NO - to old
Romney - Yes.. prob would win MA in general.
Click to expand...
Well, you're certainly entitled to your views....though irrelevant to my post....the point being, she is absolutely right.

anyway, Romney's religion is against him...being Morman is ok for Reid the democrat but not for Romney the Republican...

No one wants McCain, not in 2008, not 2012, not in a million years...

Palin can't fight the liberal media smear machine. Neither could GW or his daddy...Look how successful its been already...Its even turned conservatives against her..Character assassination is their specialty....
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
Well, you're certainly entitled to your views....though irrelevant to my post....the point being, she is absolutely right.

anyway, Romney's religion is against him...being Morman is ok for Reid the democrat but not for Romney the Republican...

No one wants McCain, not in 2008, not 2012, not in a million years...

Palin can't fight the liberal media smear machine. Neither could GW or his daddy...Look how successful its been already...Its even turned conservatives against her..Character assassination is their specialty....
Click to expand...

so then whos the candidate? I personally think romney could easily beat obama in a general election if he could get thru the primary.
 
Chapdog said:
so then whos the candidate? I personally think romney could easily beat obama in a general election if he could get thru the primary.
Click to expand...
Who is the candidate?....hahaha...damned if I can guess at this point....probably some governor that hasn't gotten his or her ass lashed by the MSM yet....

Obama is by no means gonna be a pushover....don't underestimate the power of the press and tv....the unemployment rate can go to 15% and they can still convince the public Democrats are growing the economy, Obamacare will be free, and happy days are right around the next corner...

R's might just grab Congress, but BHO might still be making us nauseous with state of the union speeches....
 
Chapdog said:
Palin wouldn't even make it a competitive race against Obama. The best bet for the republicans is Romney.

Id vote:
Palin: NO - loony
Mccain: NO - to old
Romney - Yes.. prob would win MA in general.
Click to expand...

Socrtease said:
Sarah Palin is so dumb she bought a vibrator and chipped all her teeth.
Click to expand...

Both these posts essentially say the same thing. Chapdog, stop pretending that you have something intellectual to say about Palin. Just admit that you're noting more than a partisan hack, like Socteaser.
 
Rommney is the most liberal, but he will run to the right for the nomination. He is the best shot they have thus far.

Palin, is a flash in the pan, she will be the Dan Quayle of the next ten years. The idiots will love her personality, and the intelegent people will know she has no substinance.

Do any of you who love her know her stance on any issues?
 
Palin makes the news, but would never be elected.

Funny that people who call her stupid are lambasted, but when those same people call someone names it is supposed to be excepted as gospel.
 
Damn Yankee said:
Funny how lib-tards never address her positions.
Click to expand...

What positions? She has dodged taking a stance on so many issues.

Should we be impressed that her foriegn policy experience is that she can see Russia from her state?

What issues are being ignored?
 
She's an empty suit, Yankee. She doesn't really have a core of positions. She's a political opportunist & marketer.

That describes a lot of people in politics, but it is what it is, as they say.

I'm kind of amazed you think she'd be a good candidate; she has the "rock star" thing going with the base, but it won't play in a general. Part of me would love to see her as the candidate, because it would be entertaining, but mostly, I'd like to see the GOP put up a much stronger alternative.
 
Onceler said:
She's an empty suit, Yankee. She doesn't really have a core of positions. She's a political opportunist & marketer.

That describes a lot of people in politics, but it is what it is, as they say.

I'm kind of amazed you think she'd be a good candidate; she has the "rock star" thing going with the base, but it won't play in a general. Part of me would love to see her as the candidate, because it would be entertaining, but mostly, I'd like to see the GOP put up a much stronger alternative.
Click to expand...

Damn Yankee said:
Funny how lib-tards never address her positions.
Click to expand...
.
 
WinterBorn said:
Nice dodge.

Tell us what positions anyone is ignoring?
Click to expand...

Thats really the point, she really has failed to take a position, thats why I asked what positions of hers do those who love her love?

Its her personality they like, because she has almost never taken a specific stance on anything...

She is for "Reduced government waste"....

I feel fairly sure we all are!
 
I know one! She said "thanks, but no thanks" to the Bridge to Nowhere.

Oh - and an 'eye is kept" on Putin & his airspace...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top