It is divisive and disrespectful to build a mosque next to the site where 3,000....

Yup, sure can. But why should they do that for you? You don't live there. It's not your town and not your community and apparently the people of Manhattan value religious tolerance far more then you do. So why don't you just butt ouf of something that's not really and of your damned business anyways.

Political correctness and stupidity has eroded their survival instincts.
 
We have every right to express our opinion, however forcefully we might do so, peacefully. Don't worry though, as soon as it is a certainty, lots of people will be gleefully telling the world that while those buildings once stood, for US economic power, now the strong rule. They brought down one symbol, now a new one rises.


Hilarious. By the way, here is a street level view of where the Cordobo House will be:

burlington1.jpg
 
Yup, sure can. But why should they do that for you? You don't live there. It's not your town and not your community and apparently the people of Manhattan value religious tolerance far more then you do. So why don't you just butt ouf of something that's not really any of your damned business anyways.
You don't think the WTC site is of national importance, 15ppMoot?
 
Hilarious. By the way, here is a street level view of where the Cordobo House will be:

burlington1.jpg

I thought they were going to build it on Ground Zero, thats what Newt said... This photo does not show a gaping hole, it shows buildings that are still standing...?>??????>
 

Ugh, you are deliberatly being silly.

It appears to me you know you are wrong.

Answer this basic question...

Do you belive that the 1st Amendment prevents the Government from promoting the establishment or prohibiting the free exersize of Religen?
 
Ugh, you are deliberatly being silly.

It appears to me you know you are wrong.

Answer this basic question...

Do you belive that the 1st Amendment prevents the Government from promoting the establishment or prohibiting the free exersize of Religen?
And you're being a deliberate asshole. New Yorkers routinely use zoning laws to usurp the rights of its citizens, yet here they bend over to be PeeCee.
 
Ugh, you are deliberatly being silly.

It appears to me you know you are wrong.

Answer this basic question...

Do you belive that the 1st Amendment prevents the Government from promoting the establishment or prohibiting the free exersize of Religen?

Are zoning laws telling someone how to use their property constitutional?
 
Are zoning laws telling someone how to use their property constitutional?

Some are and some are not....

A zoning law that deliberatly attempted to prevent a Mosque because people dont like Islam would be Unconstitutional....
 
No, I said a canidate for federal office should not express this opinion because it is illrelevant and because it has a chilling effect on religous freedom.


If you could read, you would know that.

this is the stupidest post i've ever read....and that is saying alot
 
Some are and some are not....

A zoning law that deliberatly attempted to prevent a Mosque because people dont like Islam would be Unconstitutional....

How about a law that said publically accessible property cannot be used as an armory in a holy war against the host nation?
 
How about a law that said publically accessible property cannot be used as an armory in a holy war against the host nation?

Such a law might be Constitutional, yet it would not prevent the building of this Mosque because the facts dont indicate that it is being used as an armory in a holy war against anyone.
 
Such a law might be Constitutional, yet it would not prevent the building of this Mosque because the facts dont indicate that it is being used as an armory in a holy war against anyone.

The facts do indicate that it will be used for that.
 
Back
Top