Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau to retire later this year following language controversy

Why wouldn't they be?
Because I don't believe that just by virtue of the fact people want something that they're entitled to it, especially if it affects someone else. They were offended, hurt, upset or whatever other adjective you want to use, ok so what? They didn't suffer any injury and they lost nothing but he loses his job. That seems unreasonable to me.
 
Because I don't believe that just by virtue of the fact people want something that they're entitled to it, especially if it affects someone else. They were offended, hurt, upset or whatever other adjective you want to use, ok so what? They didn't suffer any injury and they lost nothing but he loses his job. That seems unreasonable to me.
Well would you pay a rich person to overlook people like you?
 
What do you think would have to be different for you to ask for his early retirement?
If he wasn't remorseful, and if Canada was actually guilty of a record of minimizing, ignoring, and downplaying the French speaking residents. Canada has bent over backwards to accommodate Quebec Province in language, culture, and politics.

It's not like this language issue is a massive and unaddressed problem in Canada.
 
If he wasn't remorseful, and if Canada was actually guilty of a record of minimizing, ignoring, and downplaying the French speaking residents. Canada has bent over backwards to accommodate Quebec Province in language, culture, and politics.

It's not like this language issue is a massive and unaddressed problem in Canada.
So this "early retirement" is bullshit.
 
So this "early retirement" is bullshit.
I personally wouldn't scapegoat him. The guy says he feels bad that he could never learn to speak proper French, even though he has tried to take lessons. That's an excusable human fallibility.

On the other hand, Air Canada is partly owned by the government, and by law is supposed to provide services in both French and English. As an administrative matter it probably behooves Air Canada to eventually have a CEO who is bilingual.
 
I personally wouldn't scapegoat him. The guy says he feels bad that he could never learn to speak proper French, even though he has tried to take lessons. That's an excusable human fallibility.

On the other hand, Air Canada is partly owned by the government, and by law is supposed to provide services in both French and English. As an administrative matter it probably behooves Air Canada to eventually have a CEO who is bilingual.
Fair enough but in this instance it's bullshit?
 
Back
Top