Are we winning War?

Tobytone said:
I will never answer you. You are firmly in the crazy psycho column for me. I do however note your concerns.
Click to expand...

no.

you insane people on a quest to build a temple are the crazy psychos.

:truestory:

if it weren't true you would just say no.

but it is true, and a small part of you still doesn't like lying.

a very small part, like your weenie.

your truth weenie.
 
Monad Portal said:
no.

you insane people on a quest to build a temple are the crazy psychos.

:truestory:

if it weren't true you would just say no.

but it is true, and a small part of you still doesn't like lying.

a very small part, like your weenie.

your truth weenie.
Click to expand...
I really hope you are supervised, 24 hours a day. I can only assume you're desperate for someone to engage as usual. I tried to help you with that. Obviously you rejected my advice. Take the recommended dose.
 
Monad Portal said:
go for it, gay boy.

put that in your notes.
Click to expand...
No silly, get your nurse to read it and explain. There wasn't anything in my comment to 'go for it.' It's ok, stay calm. This is a time to keep your cool and ask for a little extra help, that's what all those people in white are for, it's all good. You'll get there.
 
Tobytone said:
No silly, get your nurse to read it and explain. There wasn't anything in my comment to 'go for it.' It's ok, stay calm. This is a time to keep your cool and ask for a little extra help, that's what all those people in white are for, it's all good. You'll get there.
Click to expand...

do it now, bitch, or shut your fuckin' dumb hole.
 
Tobytone said:
LOL, I was hoping this loser would come back. This is an example of a JPP loser getting exposed as a hypocrite and a vile scumbag before he ran away. Let's recap: (this is for my collection more than anything, but by all means check it out if you're not clear about Chives. After this exchange, the 'vile scumbag' became a new designation added to moron, idiot, simpleton, and libtard. You'll understand why. Admittedly, this is a waste of time for anyone that already knows how insane this moron is. I wanted to put this together in a single reply. I want to show it elsewhere.

I commented: It baffles my mind how you morons can't understand why we're doing this. It's pretty simple. The president said something like, when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. It is not in America's national interest to allow a massacre in Iran that would reverberate across the region and stain the conscience of the world.

How is that unclear, and how can anyone disagree to the point they are already complaining less than two weeks in? What is wrong with you people??
Then it took like four attempts to get the simpleton to answer the very simple question, but after several requests to answer this question first, he replied with this:

The first part sure, everyone does, straight out of Clausewitz, the second part, which you are assuming automatically relates to the first, no, it wasn’t in our national interests to start a war over some supposed massacre that hasn’t happened.

At this point, as any normal person would, I realized he's a real-life lunatic, no hyperbole. I had to hold off from telling him I was setting him up for embarrassment again and find out more about this 'supposed massacre' he referenced. So, I held off telling him the words I posted that he opposed were spoken by Obama when he hit Libya without any threats to America at all. That's not my opinion that is a universal fact. Seven months later 400 civilians dead and Kaddafi still alive. Finally he got Kaddafi a month after the bombing campaign. Political assasination for what exactly? No big discussions in the lamestream press, nothing but praise about Obama's decisive military use. Chris Mathews had chills running down his legs. I'll bet anything Chives was silent on the issue if not praising it. Just another example of libtard hypocrisy. Chives didn't catch on, as usual. Here's my reply to his insane statement:

Wow, you believe the reports of over 30,000 protesters being killed is a lie? Do you believe they kill protesters at all? I guess we have to start there. I'll admit, I didn't see that coming.

I knew he was a moron, but I didn't realize just how far gone the moron was until that last comment.

He replied: (like any insane person, completely disconnected from his previous claim, 'Supposed massacre that never happened, but whatever. Crazy people don't make sense, so here's his reply.

Number of protesters killed range from 7,000 to 30,000 (https://www.theguardian.com/global-...ll-disappeared-bodies-mass-burials-30000-dead), 53,000 Nigerians, 59,000 Sudanese, and undetermined numbers of citizens in Chad have died, are we going to go to war in those nations?

How is it in our national concern, and how does it affect the whole ME?

And if that was your reason for going to war it has failed, the Iranians aren’t in revolt and there has been no regime change, in fact, the new Supreme leader, the son, is reported to be more of a strict autocrat than the father

Before that reply, Bartender chick came in to defend Chives. I assumed Chives ran away after his insane comment, so I let Bartender chick in on the joke and explained why both of them were insane and historically ignorant. When I did get the reply above, I told Chives to go read what I wrote to Bartender chick to get filled in. Here it is.

You need to read my response to bartender. That was Obama's reasoning, it wasn't Iran, it was Libya. I explained the one word I changed was changing Benghazi to Iran. I think you fell for the same trick before. Not sure, you're all the same. Also, you'll find some of the actual reasons we are doing what we're doing now. Everything I've said in two long posts to Bartender apply to you and every libtard. Again, you're all exactly the same idiot. Read a book, learn something, you're making a fool of yourself, just like every other moron here.

After my response, Chives, confused like always, wrote the final reply. He obviously didn't understand my original comment was all Obama, I only changed one word. I changed Benghazi to Iran and set the trap. One I had done to this moron before, lol.

jaysus, now we’re importing Libya, wants a direct answer to his question which I delivered, and he apparently can not invalidate, so now we got Obama and Libya thrown in, one needs a scorecard to keep track. (what an absolute dumbass, lmfao)

If anyone bothered to go through this chain, you can clearly see that Chives is a clueless, insane, scumbag. His article from the Guardian (a radical left-wing outlet) didn't even report the numbers he posted. Those estimates were only published in three sites he was too embarrassed to reveal so I guess he put up an article from a source he considers reliable. Forget about the fact his very own reply contradicts his previous statement.

If you bother to read what I wrote to Bartender chick, you'll see I did anything but run, I proved that he's a hypocrite with the added bonus of revealing just how insane the moron is. If anyone here should be monitored, he should be on the short list. I wouldn't be surprised if this loser is a member of the IRGC, lol. At least in his hollowed out blackened heart. They would cut his throat as soon as his usefulness wore out, just like they did to all the socialist and communist after they helped the regime take power in 79.

Adios Chives, enjoy your ignorance and stupidity, I did.
Click to expand...
Well, outside of the “he’s a …………,” and “he’s …………,” you asked a question, I answered it, and after failing to directly address my answer, you deflected off on Obama, Libya, and “bartender,” the facts, and that is all one needs to know about that
 
archives said:

“Trump keeps telling America he’s winning in Iran. He’s less clear in explaining how the war ends”​

apnews.com

Trump keeps telling America he's winning in Iran. He's less clear in explaining how the war ends

When it comes to the war with Iran, President Donald Trump has cycled from calls for “unconditional surrender” to sounding amenable to an end state in which Iran trades one hard-line ayatollah for another.
apnews.com apnews.com

How do we know when the war is successful? What’s the exit strategy?

We are pounding Iran daily, but he leadership is still intact, there is no citizenry revolt, no record of eliminating its nuclear potential, Iran is still fighting, exporting oil, so when do we know we have achieved our goals? What benchmarks are there indicating success?

As much as we have caused Iran pain, they have also created problems by disrupting the world’s economy, which has always been their war objective

So are we winning?
Click to expand...
Winning the war in Iran means successfully crushing the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). All of the real power in the regime -political and economic - in wielded by the Commander - in - Chief of the IRGC; everything else in the Iranian regime is just ceremonial window dressing. The IRGC were never a match for the US forces and the IDF, they're already crumbling under the combined assault.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top