Are we winning War?
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
Because within a week without any existing plan for succession their political and religious leader for over three decades was quickly replaces, and, the organized missile attacks across the region continue, both signs of a functioning government
Lie. Assumption of victory fallacy.
Not about the 'nuclear threat', anchovies.
You are still locked in this paradox, anchovies. Which is it?
No need. The leaders are dead.
Iran is not a neighbor, anchovies.
Iran has no more missiles.
Iran has no navy.
Iran has no airforce.
Iran's leaders are dead.
What war, anchovies?
Same old bullshit ^ recycled again and again and again, couldn’t be a whiter towel hitting the canvas
Monad Portal
Was it me?
you not understanding what a paradox is detracts from all your arguments.
YOU brought it up, anchovies. You have only yourself to blame.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
but the leadership is not intact.
its three layers down.
you just look stupid saying this.
What missile attacks, anchovies?? You are still locked in this paradox.
Yup. That's you. You are still locked in your paradox. Denying it doesn't make it go away. The only way out is to utterly discard one of the conflicting arguments.
Wrong again, never bought up Obama and Libya, you are lying, again
Go learn English.
Lie. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!
And then he doubles down with the same, some just never get it, never will
And regardless of how many capital letters you employ, you are still lying
Monad Portal
Was it me?
go learn what a fucking paradox is, retarded idiot.
LOL, I was hoping this loser would come back. This is an example of a JPP loser getting exposed as a hypocrite and a vile scumbag before he ran away. Let's recap: (this is for my collection more than anything, but by all means check it out if you're not clear about Chives. After this exchange, the 'vile scumbag' became a new designation added to moron, idiot, simpleton, and libtard. You'll understand why. Admittedly, this is a waste of time for anyone that already knows how insane this moron is. I wanted to put this together in a single reply. I want to show it elsewhere.
I commented: It baffles my mind how you morons can't understand why we're doing this. It's pretty simple. The president said something like, when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. It is not in America's national interest to allow a massacre in Iran that would reverberate across the region and stain the conscience of the world.
How is that unclear, and how can anyone disagree to the point they are already complaining less than two weeks in? What is wrong with you people??
Then it took like four attempts to get the simpleton to answer the very simple question, but after several requests to answer this question first, he replied with this:
The first part sure, everyone does, straight out of Clausewitz, the second part, which you are assuming automatically relates to the first, no, it wasn’t in our national interests to start a war over some supposed massacre that hasn’t happened.
At this point, as any normal person would, I realized he's a real-life lunatic, no hyperbole. I had to hold off from telling him I was setting him up for embarrassment again and find out more about this 'supposed massacre' he referenced. So, I held off telling him the words I posted that he opposed were spoken by Obama when he hit Libya without any threats to America at all. That's not my opinion that is a universal fact. Seven months later 400 civilians dead and Kaddafi still alive. Finally he got Kaddafi a month after the bombing campaign. Political assasination for what exactly? No big discussions in the lamestream press, nothing but praise about Obama's decisive military use. Chris Mathews had chills running down his legs. I'll bet anything Chives was silent on the issue if not praising it. Just another example of libtard hypocrisy. Chives didn't catch on, as usual. Here's my reply to his insane statement:
Wow, you believe the reports of over 30,000 protesters being killed is a lie? Do you believe they kill protesters at all? I guess we have to start there. I'll admit, I didn't see that coming.
I knew he was a moron, but I didn't realize just how far gone the moron was until that last comment.
He replied: (like any insane person, completely disconnected from his previous claim, 'Supposed massacre that never happened, but whatever. Crazy people don't make sense, so here's his reply.
Number of protesters killed range from 7,000 to 30,000 (https://www.theguardian.com/global-...ll-disappeared-bodies-mass-burials-30000-dead), 53,000 Nigerians, 59,000 Sudanese, and undetermined numbers of citizens in Chad have died, are we going to go to war in those nations?
How is it in our national concern, and how does it affect the whole ME?
And if that was your reason for going to war it has failed, the Iranians aren’t in revolt and there has been no regime change, in fact, the new Supreme leader, the son, is reported to be more of a strict autocrat than the father
Before that reply, Bartender chick came in to defend Chives. I assumed Chives ran away after his insane comment, so I let Bartender chick in on the joke and explained why both of them were insane and historically ignorant. When I did get the reply above, I told Chives to go read what I wrote to Bartender chick to get filled in. Here it is.
You need to read my response to bartender. That was Obama's reasoning, it wasn't Iran, it was Libya. I explained the one word I changed was changing Benghazi to Iran. I think you fell for the same trick before. Not sure, you're all the same. Also, you'll find some of the actual reasons we are doing what we're doing now. Everything I've said in two long posts to Bartender apply to you and every libtard. Again, you're all exactly the same idiot. Read a book, learn something, you're making a fool of yourself, just like every other moron here.
After my response, Chives, confused like always, wrote the final reply. He obviously didn't understand my original comment was all Obama, I only changed one word. I changed Benghazi to Iran and set the trap. One I had done to this moron before, lol.
jaysus, now we’re importing Libya, wants a direct answer to his question which I delivered, and he apparently can not invalidate, so now we got Obama and Libya thrown in, one needs a scorecard to keep track. (what an absolute dumbass, lmfao)
If anyone bothered to go through this chain, you can clearly see that Chives is a clueless, insane, scumbag. His article from the Guardian (a radical left-wing outlet) didn't even report the numbers he posted. Those estimates were only published in three sites he was too embarrassed to reveal so I guess he put up an article from a source he considers reliable. Forget about the fact his very own reply contradicts his previous statement.
If you bother to read what I wrote to Bartender chick, you'll see I did anything but run, I proved that he's a hypocrite with the added bonus of revealing just how insane the moron is. If anyone here should be monitored, he should be on the short list. I wouldn't be surprised if this loser is a member of the IRGC, lol. At least in his hollowed out blackened heart. They would cut his throat as soon as his usefulness wore out, just like they did to all the socialist and communist after they helped the regime take power in 79.
Adios Chives, enjoy your ignorance and stupidity, I did.
Your moronic concerns are noted.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
I knew you wouldn't answer, brainwashed zio-cretin.
this should have been an easy "no".
Monad Portal
Was it me?
if you weren't all kiddie transers there would have been a real choice.
I will never answer you. You are firmly in the crazy psycho column for me. I do however note your concerns.