Yes on Prop 19 Winning 52%-36%; Majority Supports Legalizing Marijuana

Topspin

Verified User
Yes on Prop 19 Winning 52%-36%; Majority Supports Legalizing Marijuana
By: Jon Walker Monday July 26, 2010 7:44 pm


Proposition 19, which would legalize, tax and regulate marijuana for adults over 21 years old, is currently winning by a wide margin among California voters according to a new PPP poll. The measure is supported by 52% of voters while opposed by only 36%.

Prop 19 PPP (7/23-25)
Support 52%
Oppose 36%
Not Sure 12%

This is the largest margin of support we have seen from recent polling on Prop 19. Interestingly, the poll found support among African Americans to be extremely high. From PPP blog:

Democrats are more likely to throw their support behind the prop than Republicans. 62% of Democrats, 37% of Republicans and 55% of Independents support Prop 19.

African-Americans are the strongest supporters of Prop 19; 68:32, followed by Whites who support it 53:37.

Those are surprisingly high numbers among African Americans. A SurveyUSA poll from earlier this month had African Americans on average about as likely to support Prop 19 as whites. Significantly, a small percentage of African Americans said they were certain to oppose it.

Both this PPP Poll and the SurveyUSA poll directly contradict a Field Poll (PDF) which had African Americans dramatically less supportive of Prop 19 than whites in California. It would seem that there is a problem accurately gauging support for Prop 19 among the African American community. This might be due to the taboo nature of this specific policy issue resulting from the government spending huge amounts of money on anti-marijuana propaganda for decades. It is possible that African Americans, and possibly other ethnic groups, don’t feel comfortable telling pollsters their actual position on legalizing cannabis.

Plurality of American adults supports legalizing marijuana.

In addition, there is more good news about support for marijuana legalization from Rasmussen Reports. For the first time, their poll of all American adults has a plurality supporting legalization: 43% think marijuana should be legalized while 42% think it should remain illegal. That is a significant improvement from a similar Rasmussen poll just a little over a year ago, which found 41% supporting legalization and 49% opposed. It is possible that Prop 19, by bringing the debate to the forefront, is starting to noticeably move national opinions by forcing people to take some time to actually think about the issue.

The most interesting part of the Rasmussen poll is that a solid majority thinks legalization is a real possibility in the relatively short term.

65% believe it is at least somewhat likely marijuana will be legalized in the United States in the next 10 years. Just 28% do not expect this to happen. Those numbers include 29% who say it is Very Likely pot will be legal in the next 10 years and five percent (5%) who say it is Not At All Likely.

It is important to point out that the subset of American adults who actually vote tends to be older and less supportive of legalization than the general public, so we probably have not yet reached the point where a plurality of the all important “likely voters” supports legalization, but at the current rate that point could be reached soon.
 
African-Americans are the strongest supporters of Prop 19; 68:32, followed by Whites who support it 53:37.


Gee, I can't imagine why. Supposedly it might have to do with the fact that our racially-biased criminal justice system routinely prosecutes and incarcerates blacks at a far higher rate than whitey.

But we aren't supposed to talk about racism on this board (I always have some tea bag partier yell at me when I do) so I'll leave that query for the left wing blogs.
 
Yeah, but much to my liking Sarah Barracuda came out for decrim smartly saying cops have real criminals to chace.
this is the most important vote in 50yrs imo, and I'm Cali dreaming again. Kayak fishing in Monterey Bay, playing tennis and of course the daily ghanja sacrament.

Jah live children yeah
 
Gee, I can't imagine why. Supposedly it might have to do with the fact that our racially-biased criminal justice system routinely prosecutes and incarcerates blacks at a far higher rate than whitey.

But we aren't supposed to talk about racism on this board (I always have some tea bag partier yell at me when I do) so I'll leave that query for the left wing blogs.

What do you attribute to blacky getting prosecuted at a far higher rate then whitey??
 
Really!!

So what are you attributing this disparity to?

it applies manly to driving while black

also, driving while poor - a greater percentage of blacks are poor than whites but not necessarily more whites are poor than blacks

i have no quotable data for this, but perhaps more blacks carry than whites
 
it applies manly to driving while black

also, driving while poor - a greater percentage of blacks are poor than whites but not necessarily more whites are poor than blacks

i have no quotable data for this, but perhaps more blacks carry than whites

Therefore your assertion is that more blacks are arrested for grass; because more blacks are stopped, while being in possession of grass!!
Or is it
More poor are arrested for grass; because more poor are stopped, while being in possession of grass!!

People are arrested for being in possession of grass; because being in possession of grass is against the law.

If more blacks are arrested for speeding, then whites; is it going to be because they are black and speeding, or is it just because they are black?
 
Therefore your assertion is that more blacks are arrested for grass; because more blacks are stopped, while being in possession of grass!!
Or is it
More poor are arrested for grass; because more poor are stopped, while being in possession of grass!!

People are arrested for being in possession of grass; because being in possession of grass is against the law.

If more blacks are arrested for speeding, then whites; is it going to be because they are black and speeding, or is it just because they are black?

my assertion, not proven though, is that more blacks are stopped and searched for drugs than whites
 
my assertion, not proven though, is that more blacks are stopped and searched for drugs than whites

So your assertion is that Law Enforcement are ignoring the possible drug possession by the white traffic violaters; but are instead spending more of their time, searching black traffic violaters in order to find drug possession??
 
So your assertion is that Law Enforcement are ignoring the possible drug possession by the white traffic violaters; but are instead spending more of their time, searching black traffic violaters in order to find drug possession??

yes - possession is an easy bust

when my son and i lived in santa clarita, ca - the local sheriff knew that he was selling and using pot but they did not care much as long as he did not sell to kids or deal heavy weight - they would stop him occasionally and confiscate (but not bust) what he had on him...for their own use - small towns are like that
 
yes - possession is an easy bust

when my son and i lived in santa clarita, ca - the local sheriff knew that he was selling and using pot but they did not care much as long as he did not sell to kids or deal heavy weight - they would stop him occasionally and confiscate (but not bust) what he had on him...for their own use - small towns are like that

And of course, it would seem to be fair to believe that you demanded that he be treated just like the black dealers they were obviously being heavy handed with!!
 
Back
Top