Why not Florida or Texas?

Citation?
chevrolet-citation-3.jpg
 
We don't have any evidence they are happening.
This the same asinine argument we see from you deformed monkeys about election fraud. You rail against laws that would require people to identify themselves when they vote and then claim there's no even fence of voter fraud.
 
I’m asking for a basis for your claim, I cannot find anything that supports it.
There are no reports here that DHS has sent 2,000 ICE agents to any Texas city. We have ICE operations, but not on the scale that they have sent to blue cities! It’s reported they are mostly targeting jails and courtrooms here, and leaving farms and construction sites unaffected as per request of our governor.
 

I notice how you keep proving to us you are an idiot living in an idiotic echo chamber
 
There are no reports here that DHS has sent 2,000 ICE agents to any Texas city. We have ICE operations, but not on the scale that they have sent to blue cities! It’s reported they are mostly targeting jails and courtrooms here, and leaving farms and construction sites unaffected as per request of our governor.
They want to cause domestic unrest in big blue cities.
 
"As one might expect, states that mandate local collaboration with federal law enforcement often have higher levels of ICE arrests, with places like Tennessee, Florida, and Texas among the most extreme examples."



DERP DERP
 
You are only one person. Stop using the Marxist "We".
don't have any evidence they are happening.
"State cooperation with ICE: As one might expect, states that mandate local collaboration with federal law enforcement often have higher levels of ICE arrests, with places like Tennessee, Florida, and Texas among the most extreme examples. To understand the impact of changes to immigration enforcement this year, our analysis compared arrests made between January 20 and May 20 to those made between May 21 and October 15. We found that Texas has the highest overall ICE arrests in this data, and their ICE arrest rate nearly doubled from the first to second period, from about 58 per 100,000 state residents to 110 per 100,000."

 
Back
Top