Hegseth issues an illegal order.

Yakuda said:
A

From the article

"The remarks came in response to a Washington Post report on Friday that said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had given a verbal order to kill everyone aboard boats suspected of smuggling drugs, and that this led a military commander to carry out a second strike to kill those who had initially survived an attack in early September."

First this is all based on a "report" by a leftist propaganda outlet with no actual evidence that hegseth gave a second order. So the call for an investigation is based on a questionable assertion made my a biased news source. You have no fucking clue what was ordered and the thing is you fuckers don't give a shit what orders were given you just want to bark.
Click to expand...
So you don't want the investigation? Why not?
 
AProudLefty said:
Then what was your point about Obama? Trying to deflect?
Click to expand...

The question was obvious to anyone with even half a brain, which you are obviously lacking.

Was Obama acting criminally when he blew up US citizens and terrorists in foreign nations? It's a simple yes or no.

You see, you cannot claim that Trump or Hegseth is acting illegally here, if it was A OK for Obama. Unless, of course, you are a brainless halfwit hypocrite who cannot remember what your argument is, was or ever will be.

AProudLefty said:
Are you worried that Hegseth might have violated a law? Why? Trump can replace him. No problem.
Click to expand...

How did you arrive at such an erroneous, absurd and illogical question? Now answer mine instead of answering with a question which is a dotard's argument. Was Obama acting criminally? If so, should he have been impeached?
 
Jarod said:
It looks like he did, but you have some doubt, so I am asking you what your position would be if it were true, you keep refusing to answer, telling.
Click to expand...
A better question; what if your claim on this thread is purposely false? What if you are just making stupid shit up again?
 
Truth Detector said:
The question was obvious to anyone with even half a brain, which you are obviously lacking.

Was Obama acting criminally when he blew up US citizens and terrorists in foreign nations? It's a simple yes or no.

You see, you cannot claim that Trump or Hegseth is acting illegally here, if it was A OK for Obama. Unless, of course, you are a brainless halfwit hypocrite who cannot remember what your argument is, was or ever will be.
Click to expand...
Still not comprehending my point. If you think it was wrong of Obama to do that, then you also agree that it was wrong of Hegseth to order the killings of survivors.
Truth Detector said:
How did you arrive at such an erroneous, absurd and illogical question? Now answer mine instead of answering with a question which is a dotard's argument. Was Obama acting criminally? If so, should he have been impeached?
Click to expand...
Then investigate him for all I care. If he committed war crimes, he should answer for that, just like Bush.
 
QP! said:
I put it at zero percent chance that Trump does not give a blanket Pardon to 'everyone who served in his Admin and on his campaign team'. Just a huge sweeping pardon in the way he did with Jan6 criminals.

Trump could maybe have a sudden health event that would knock him out of the office and not allow him to do it but then JD Vance would do it. JD might even start with it as the big coming battle amongst those who want to be the next POTUS candidate for the republicans is who can find a way to hold on the magat part of the base and keep those low turnout voters showing up. So far they tend to only show up when Trump is on the ballet.

That is exactly why McCarthy and McConnell verbalized support for Trump after they first pointed out that the Jan6th riots were criminal and Trump could be held accountable for them.

They did truly want Trump gone, and they hoped the new Dem AG would prosecute him and rid the party of him, but they never imagined a person as weak as Merrick Garland in the position as they just imagined what Bill Barr would have done to Obama or Biden in that spot.

What they wanted was for the Dem's to take Trump down while they screamed how unfair it was and as they 'fought for Trump', as the Trump base would never accept anyone who sides with him being out. So the leadership had to play along and fight the Dems while hoping the Dems succeeded.
Click to expand...
He has that awesome example from Biden to follow, and has to do everything "bigger and better" so why not? I see it pretty much always happening from here on out. Trump does it, to stop Ds from going after everyone in his administration in petty lawfare, the next folks do it just because Biden and Trump did and now it is "Tradition", taken for granted that this is what happens as they leave office. Who cares that nobody trusts any administration anymore after that?
 
Yakuda said:
Because you're a retard.

Ask your mom to redirect you to post #30 and ask her to read it to you. You might understand why an "investigation" or anything "learned" from it might be more than questionable
Click to expand...
This one?
Yakuda said:
I love this, "...the committee would "determine the facts related to these circumstances."". LMFAO as if the facts don't exist without the committee deciding what they are. Such leftist clap trap bullshit
Click to expand...
Do you even know what "determine" means?

Are you worried? If the investigation turns out to be a nothing burger, you'll be able to unclench your spinchcer.
 
AProudLefty said:
This one?

Do you even know what "determine" means?

Are you worried? If the investigation turns out to be a nothing burger, you'll be able to unclench your spinchcer.
Click to expand...
I know what determine means and that is your problem but a fact is a fact. It doesn't need to be determined. He either gave the order or he didn't. There have been lots of "investigations" that have led to "determined" facts.

It's a fact trump was found liable for rape but it's also a fact the gold digging whore couldn't even remember what year the supposed rape took place. So its not even a fact that the rape actually took place just that he was found liable for it but that doesn't stop you demented squirrels.

It's also a fact that had the rape actually taken place criminal charges could have been brought against Trump but even the most insane hate filled leftist lawyer didn't bring a single charge of rape against him
 
Yakuda said:
I know what determine means and that is your problem but a fact is a fact. It doesn't need to be determined. He either gave the order or he didn't. There have been lots of "investigations" that have led to "determined" facts.

It's a fact trump was found liable for rape but it's also a fact the gold digging whore couldn't even remember what year the supposed rape took place. So its not even a fact that the rape actually took place just that he was found liable for it but that doesn't stop you demented squirrels.

It's also a fact that had the rape actually taken place criminal charges could have been brought against Trump but even the most insane hate filled leftist lawyer didn't bring a single charge of rape against him
Click to expand...
It never stopped you squirrels about Biden and Hunter and Hillary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top