What is @Truth Detector trying to say?
What is @Truth Detector trying to say?
I put in the 100 percent category that everything you say is moronic, unhinged and won't age well.I put it at zero percent chance that Trump does not give a blanket Pardon to 'everyone who served in his Admin and on his campaign team'. Just a huge sweeping pardon in the way he did with Jan6 criminals.
Trump could maybe have a sudden health event that would knock him out of the office and not allow him to do it but then JD Vance would do it. JD might even start with it as the big coming battle amongst those who want to be the next POTUS candidate for the republicans is who can find a way to hold on the magat part of the base and keep those low turnout voters showing up. So far they tend to only show up when Trump is on the ballet.
That is exactly why McCarthy and McConnell verbalized support for Trump after they first pointed out that the Jan6th riots were criminal and Trump could be held accountable for them.
They did truly want Trump gone, and they hoped the new Dem AG would prosecute him and rid the party of him, but they never imagined a person as weak as Merrick Garland in the position as they just imagined what Bill Barr would have done to Obama or Biden in that spot.
What they wanted was for the Dem's to take Trump down while they screamed how unfair it was and as they 'fought for Trump', as the Trump base would never accept anyone who sides with him being out. So the leadership had to play along and fight the Dems while hoping the Dems succeeded.
How does the Geneva Convention apply here? Be specific. Are we at war? NO. Are drug smuggling criminals uniformed combatants? NO.Let's start with the Geneva Convention.

Really? That's what you are trying to say? Yelling out some re----ed language?
So, this thread is suddenly about a person here? Your trolling knows few bounds halfwit.Your own people wouldn't listen. You didn't listen when you were asked to correct someone's grammar, after saying that teaching was your job multiple times.

That is a tacit agreement.So, when Obama targeted US citizens and terrorists in ME nations with drone missiles, those were war crimes?
Says the guy who keeps attacking posters.So, this thread is suddenly about a person here? Your trolling knows few bounds halfwit.![]()
No, that's what you look like when you ask stupid rhetorical questions that have been answered dozens of times. If you had a brain, which you don't, you could comprehend the OBVIOUS.Really? That's what you are trying to say? Yelling out some re----ed language?
What tacit agreement? I don't think you know what you're bloviating about. He had a tacit agreement to murder US citizens and terrorists in foreign countries? From who? LINK?That is a tacit agreement.
Says the hypocritical douchebag that is perfectly okay when his pals hurl insults.Says the guy who keeps attacking posters.
Your whataboutism in regard to Obama indicates your tacit agreement that what Hegseth reportedly did was a war crime.What tacit agreement? I don't think you know what you're bloviating about. He had a tacit agreement to murder US citizens and terrorists in foreign countries? From who? LINK?
What do you mean IF? He either gave the order or he didn't. Which is it?I did not say that. Why do you lie so much?
Anyway, my question is what would you think IF he did? Stop obfuscating and actually answer for once, look your fear in its face.
Your whataboutism in regard to Obama
Moron doesn't know fact from fiction. indicates your tacit agreement that what Hegseth reportedly did was a war crime.
According to his thread title, Hegseth gave an illegal order. Then, after being beat over the head with his dishonesty, he resorts to the "if" argument.What do you mean IF? He either gave the order or he didn't. Which is it?
You don't even know what the order was
Then what was your point about Obama? Trying to deflect?That wasn't whataboutism you brainless dunce. That was FACTUAL.Moron doesn't know fact from fiction.
Wrong. I cannot imagine a more retarded conclusion from such an uneducated mentally unstable moron.
But I get why you avoided answering the question like the dishonest dumb fuck you really are and always will be.
Hence the investigation.What do you mean IF? He either gave the order or he didn't. Which is it?
He does. The order was to kill the survivors.You don't even know what the order was
AHence the investigation.
He does. The order was to kill the survivors.
From the articleHence the investigation.
He does. The order was to kill the survivors.
It looks like he did, but you have some doubt, so I am asking you what your position would be if it were true, you keep refusing to answer, telling.What do you mean IF? He either gave the order or he didn't. Which is it?
You don't even know what the order was
"Looks" like he did. My doubt is irrelevant. He either did it or he didn't. You have no absolute proof he did.It looks like he did, but you have some doubt, so I am asking you what your position would be if it were true, you keep refusing to answer, telling.