At the Supreme Court, a debate over whether tariffs are taxes

Only SCOTUS can decide this.

I think some GOP legislators would welcome a less friendly ruling than the President would like, so voters would not suggest they are responsible for the increasing cost of living.
Duties and imposts are not increasing the cost of living. Inflation is. During the last economic depression caused by DEMOCRATS, the dollar was devalued by 37%.
 
Using your “examiner’s” logic explain to us how the SCOTUS defined the ACA as a tax

(given there is no applicable “examiner” op Ed piece “copy and paste” he can copy and paste to answer the question get ready for the predictable “you brain dead, uninformed moron……..” adolescent crapola he’s famous for)
ACA is a tax. SCOTUS does not need to pronounce it as a tax.

It is also collapsing.
 
If it is taxes, it is under the authority of Congress.
Tariffs are not taxes.
If it is duties, and somehow not taxes, it is under the authority of Congress.
...and they already approved, Wally.
If it is a law, and somehow not taxes or duties, it is under the authority of Congress.
...and they already approved, Wally.
If it is not a law, it is illegal, and trump cannot just grab people's money.
It is a law. It is legal, Wally.
 
An idiotic argument since your source says tariffs are the same as imposts.
They are.
The US Constituiton says this -

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Congress is given the power to impose tariffs. The President is NOT given that power in the Constitution. Whether a tariff is a tax has no bearing on whether Congress was given the power to impose tariffs.
...and they already approved, Poorboy.
 
Thanks, proved my point, the SCOTUS argument on the ACA
ACA is a tax.
would apply to tariffs,
Tariffs are not a tax.
and by the way, if you want to go there, no Democrat voted for the “Big + Beautiful Bill,”
So? It is already known you hate reducing taxes and that you want to keep your slush funds.
in fact three Republicans even voted against it, Vance had to be called in to get it thru a dominated GOP Congress. And to show you what a debacle of is even Trump wants to change its name before the midterms
You don't get to speak for Trump. Omniscience fallacy.

The second part of your idiocy proved my prediction, 100%, never doubted it wouldn’t

Thanks, that was easy
Insult fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.
 
So we agree that it is Congress' authority to use or delegate? Congress has specifically delegated some limited tariff powers to the president, but trump has gone well past that limited delegation. There is no such thing as a non delegation delegation, so trump is out of luck for most of the tariffs.
Trump has not exceeded anything.
 
Back
Top