That would be deflation, and it would be a disaster. Luckily, you are lying, and it is not happening.The cost of living is finally dropping
Duties and imposts are not increasing the cost of living. Inflation is. During the last economic depression caused by DEMOCRATS, the dollar was devalued by 37%.Only SCOTUS can decide this.
I think some GOP legislators would welcome a less friendly ruling than the President would like, so voters would not suggest they are responsible for the increasing cost of living.
YARP.It's fun watching Truth Detector implode.
Why is deflation a disaster, Wally?That would be deflation, and it would be a disaster.
The prices of some items are down. It's starting to hit housing and automobiles as well.Luckily, you are lying, and it is not happening.
Why?We want prices mostly stable, rising at a 2% rate.
LIF. Grow up. Buzzword fallacy. MAGA is not a person.Truth Detector: Classic projection.
Jake Starkey: T D is such a gas lighter. Most maga are.
ACA is a tax. SCOTUS does not need to pronounce it as a tax.Using your “examiner’s” logic explain to us how the SCOTUS defined the ACA as a tax
(given there is no applicable “examiner” op Ed piece “copy and paste” he can copy and paste to answer the question get ready for the predictable “you brain dead, uninformed moron……..” adolescent crapola he’s famous for)
It makes paying back borrowed money difficult, if not impossible. It rewards laziness, and not producing nor buying. It is related to dark ages.Why is deflation a disaster, Wally?
Tariffs are not taxes.If it is taxes, it is under the authority of Congress.
...and they already approved, Wally.If it is duties, and somehow not taxes, it is under the authority of Congress.
...and they already approved, Wally.If it is a law, and somehow not taxes or duties, it is under the authority of Congress.
It is a law. It is legal, Wally.If it is not a law, it is illegal, and trump cannot just grab people's money.
...and they already approved, Sybil.Taxes and tariffs are subject to Congress.
They are.An idiotic argument since your source says tariffs are the same as imposts.
...and they already approved, Poorboy.The US Constituiton says this -
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Congress is given the power to impose tariffs. The President is NOT given that power in the Constitution. Whether a tariff is a tax has no bearing on whether Congress was given the power to impose tariffs.
What 'emergency power'??LOL. You are too stupid to understand temporary giving power in an emergency to delegating the power forever.
ACA is a tax.Thanks, proved my point, the SCOTUS argument on the ACA
Tariffs are not a tax.would apply to tariffs,
So? It is already known you hate reducing taxes and that you want to keep your slush funds.and by the way, if you want to go there, no Democrat voted for the “Big + Beautiful Bill,”
You don't get to speak for Trump. Omniscience fallacy.in fact three Republicans even voted against it, Vance had to be called in to get it thru a dominated GOP Congress. And to show you what a debacle of is even Trump wants to change its name before the midterms
Insult fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.The second part of your idiocy proved my prediction, 100%, never doubted it wouldn’t
Thanks, that was easy
Trump has not exceeded anything.So we agree that it is Congress' authority to use or delegate? Congress has specifically delegated some limited tariff powers to the president, but trump has gone well past that limited delegation. There is no such thing as a non delegation delegation, so trump is out of luck for most of the tariffs.
Stay out of debt.It makes paying back borrowed money difficult, if not impossible.
How?It rewards laziness,
Prices are lower due to better production, Wally.and not producing nor buying.
Deflation has occurred long after the Dark Ages, Wally.It is related to dark ages.
Inversion fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy. That won't work, anchovies.No content ^, just the same lame adolescent personal crapola, always predictable, just like the towel hitting the canvas
Fallacy fallacy. Hallucination.And defiantly a lack of originality, “I know you are, but what am I”
What 'illegal order', Sybil?
What 'billionaires' and who was 'bought'?
You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Sybil.I am glad they are watching you closely