You must refuse illegal orders!

The law always has its vague areas. Telling the troops the truth is never wrong.
I never said it was wrong. I said it was completely irresponsible to say something that vague without providing legal context. It's classic despotism, telling the grunts and low ranking soldiers not do do certain things without giving a metric on what that is. It allows those that issued the idiotically vague recommendations without taking any responsibility for negative consequences experienced by that grunt/low ranking soldier. Case in point, The College Park, Ga arrest of Charles Reed. Some dumbass bitch accused Mr. Reed of home invasion/breaking and entering, then assaulting her and running away. 9 months later, with almost zero investigation, police secured an arrest warrant for Mr. Reed. He went to the police station to turn himself in when he found out about the warrant. Mr Reed has been a paraplegic in a wheelchair for 25 years............so when the arresting officer tried to explain this to his supervisor, the supervisor couldn't bother to get up from his lunch and simply said 'it's a ruse to avoid going to jail', basically ordering his subordinate to make the arrest. Guess who got fired and who kept his job with no reprimand????????


In other words, stop being a black and white dumbass and look at all situations objectively to see the stupid shit you're supporting.
 
I never said it was wrong. I said it was completely irresponsible to say something that vague without providing legal context. It's classic despotism, telling the grunts and low ranking soldiers not do do certain things without giving a metric on what that is. It allows those that issued the idiotically vague recommendations without taking any responsibility for negative consequences experienced by that grunt/low ranking soldier. Case in point, The College Park, Ga arrest of Charles Reed. Some dumbass bitch accused Mr. Reed of home invasion/breaking and entering, then assaulting her and running away. 9 months later, with almost zero investigation, police secured an arrest warrant for Mr. Reed. He went to the police station to turn himself in when he found out about the warrant. Mr Reed has been a paraplegic in a wheelchair for 25 years............so when the arresting officer tried to explain this to his supervisor, the supervisor couldn't bother to get up from his lunch and simply said 'it's a ruse to avoid going to jail', basically ordering his subordinate to make the arrest. Guess who got fired and who kept his job with no reprimand????????


In other words, stop being a black and white dumbass and look at all situations objectively to see the stupid shit you're supporting.
Waaaaaa, so do you support a criminal investigation?

If it’s a responsible thing or not, is a legit discussion…. However it cannot be had in the shadow of TACO’s launching a criminal investigation and calling it sedition.
 
Trump is crazy and rightys fall in line. The fact that they said ILLEGAL orders makes the bruhaha a joke. They did not tell them to disobey legal orders. They were in compliance with the military code. Trump thinks that if he tells you to do something, you do it without question. He does think he is king. It is Trump who is wrong.
 
You're the stupid fuck that doesn't understand that the founders did not create a restricted federal government, then hand over the power to define those restrictions to that very government, which is why 'shall not be infringed' means NO FUCKING REGULATIONS, you bonafide moron of the highest caliber
^Dumbfuck denies SCOTUS.
 
Waaaaaa, so do you support a criminal investigation?

If it’s a responsible thing or not, is a legit discussion…. However it cannot be had in the shadow of TACO’s launching a criminal investigation and calling it sedition.
NO, I do not support a criminal investigation, unless they are only trying to show complete negligence.
 
“Now, IF that’s the case…”

Nope, fucktard, that’s NOT the case.

Fucking cultist moron.
How do you know, are you psychotic... err, psychic, or something? What purpose was intended in sending this message. Those producing it have no examples of Trump or the administration issuing clearly illegal orders. Questionable ones don't rise to "illegal."

Therefore, what was the intent of this message? I'd say it was intended to sow doubt in the military's top leadership.

It is YOU that is the "fucktard" here. You hate Trump so much that you can't see the issues with congressmen putting out a public message to the military that they should question orders coming from the top of their chain of command.
 
Military lawyers are saying what I'm saying.

Troops risk court-martial if they follow Democrats’ ‘illegal orders’ advice, former military lawyers warn​



Good job for finding an article from Fox News.

Oh look I can find an article too on what a former military lawyer says!

 
Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.

Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?

Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
So what orders are being issued by Trump that are illegal?
 
The Democrats are implying, because they specifically included statements about the current administration and Trump in their message, that Trump and his administration are issuing illegal orders and that troops should refuse to follow those orders.

Now, if that's the case, and you likely think that, it shouldn't be hard to for you to point to one or two of Trump's blatantly illegal orders that he's issued. In fact, you state so above in the highlighted portion of your post. So, list a couple of Trump's illegal orders to the military that they should refuse to obey.
Already done.

They never said to disobey legal orders.
 
Cry more, Trumpper.

:lolup: predictable response from lying leftists trying to justify the unjustifiable when getting caught lying.

Reminding the troops of their obligations is nowhere close to sedition.

Why do they need reminding? The inference from this video is that Trump is a threat and issuing illegal orders. Yet, not one of these brainless hacks in the Party of Lying Jackasses can name an illegal order.

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/UvCDS26_1D4
 
Telling troops that they are required to refuse illegal orders is stirring up friction between officers and enlisted.

Incredibly stupid position.
Your false outrage is silly.

Cry more, Trumper!
Who is asking lawmakers to tell the troops and CIA what they already know and are trained for?
 
Back
Top