^word saladYou and the rest will.
^word saladYou and the rest will.
why did dems only release 3? that is what happened.That is not what happened. You are lying. We got your gang by the balls and squeezing hard.
No i admit you are stupid.So yes the BIDEN DOJ was totally incompetent. There is only a limited number of EPSTEIN related documents at the DOJ and those documents could have been sent through a high speed optical scanner to look for Trump's name. But of course you know Trump isn't implicated in the file and that is why the Biden administration remained silent.
false world salad^^^ Dems have released many of the documents.why did dems only release 3? that is what happened.
and why did they redact info that did not need redaction?
derp derpfalse world salad^^^ Dems have released many of the documents.
Breakdown of Released Materials
- Total volume: Approximately 33,295 pages of records were released in early September 2025.
- Additional batch: In November 2025, the committee released another 20,000 pages, bringing the cumulative total to over 53,000 pages.
- Contents include:
- Court filings and flight logs
- Emails and private correspondence
- Jail surveillance video (including 13 hours from the night of Epstein’s death)
- Interview summaries and law enforcement notes
- Audio recordings and internal memos
Key Context
- Redactions: Many documents were heavily redacted, and about 97% were previously public, according to committee Democrats.
- Controversy: The release has sparked debate over selective disclosures, especially regarding high-profile individuals mentioned in the emails.
- Ongoing production: The Department of Justice is still reviewing and releasing additional materials, so the total may grow further.
Would you like a summary of the most revealing or controversial names and exchanges found in the latest Epstein document batch? I can pull highlights from the November 2025 release.
“We have flight logs. We have information, names. That will come out.” Newsweek+2Yahoo News Canada+2
Anonymous? I’m sorry, but the standards for the government punishing somebody are higher than what is required to believe something.that is swamp food
someone's name and reputation should also not be able to be smeared with anonymous slander
Can u Lib POSs name one of Epstein's victims that have stated Trump did ANYTHING?
I will wait
We already know them brainless wonder. None have accused Trump of anything. DUNCE.Maybe you should wait until we learn who all of Epstein's victims were. Do you even understand that many victims don't want to relive the abuse?

Link to your bullshit asshat.One filed a lawsuit and then disappeared.

If there are Democrats in the file, I want them exposed, just as much as if there are Republicans. If there are billionaires in the files, I want them exposed just as much as if there are poor people.JD Vance and Habba below, both core Trump Admin people have seen PROOF Dems are implicated. So why continue the Deep State protection of them saying as Fastlane does some version of 'Bidens incompetence to not expose this all means Trump should not'.
Fuck Biden and every Admin prior to him, including Trump 2016 and Obama who did not open this up and lets see Trump do the right thing now and open this up as so many in his campaign/administration held out that they would do.
-------------
JD Vance explicitly stated that “We know that Jeffrey Epstein had a lot of connections with left-wing politicians and left-wing billionaires … Democrat billionaires and Democrat political leaders went to Epstein Island all the time.” India Today+2WRAL News+2
-----------------
In a February interview with Piers Morgan, Alina Habba said:
---------------
“I don’t see how it’s not shocking that there were so many individuals that were hidden and kept secret and [have] not been held accountable.” (Alina Habba) Newsweek+1
She "never saw" him do anything. She is one person. There were 100's of victims. YOU do better!Giuffre said that Trump did nothing.
From her 2015 Deposition:
"I have never seen Donald Trump on Epstein’s island... I never saw him have sex with any underage girls." When asked if Trump had ever done anything inappropriate, she replied, "No." She also denied that Trump flirted with her or was involved in sexual encounters with Epstein's victims.
Seriously, man. Do better. This information is available to everyone.
Anonymous? I’m sorry, but the standards for the government punishing somebody are higher than what is required to believe something.
There are plenty of times where a person very reasonably believes something but it cannot be proven in a court of law. Two very different standards, we all know Donald Trump dies his hair, but there’s not enough evidence to prove it in court.
All you ever have is insults, never any substance. This is why you are roundly ignored.Rather ironic coming from an unhinged leftist loon who wallows in the lie filled narratives of the left.
A moronic argument from the moron. You seldom disappoint when it comes to illustrate how brain dead the Democratic Progressive left is.
Yeah, sure you do.If there are Democrats in the file, I want them exposed, just as much as if there are Republicans. If there are billionaires in the files, I want them exposed just as much as if there are poor people.
So what is your argument for keeping them hidden?Yeah, sure you do.
![]()
All you ever have is insults,

never any substance.
This is why you are roundly ignored.
When have I EVER argued about keeping them hidden? LINK me up dumbfuck.So what is your argument for keeping them hidden?