Can a Lib name one?

So yes the BIDEN DOJ was totally incompetent. There is only a limited number of EPSTEIN related documents at the DOJ and those documents could have been sent through a high speed optical scanner to look for Trump's name. But of course you know Trump isn't implicated in the file and that is why the Biden administration remained silent.
No i admit you are stupid.

What you say is true of millions if not billions of files that go back over 100 years and Admin after Admin does not pick up.

You are trying to create a rule that if any Admin later picks up a file all the Admins prior who did not are incompetent as they could have done it too.

You are repeating that as you are stupid.
 
why did dems only release 3? that is what happened.

and why did they redact info that did not need redaction?
false world salad^^^ Dems have released many of the documents.

Breakdown of Released Materials​

  • Total volume: Approximately 33,295 pages of records were released in early September 2025.
  • Additional batch: In November 2025, the committee released another 20,000 pages, bringing the cumulative total to over 53,000 pages.
  • Contents include:
    • Court filings and flight logs
    • Emails and private correspondence
    • Jail surveillance video (including 13 hours from the night of Epstein’s death)
    • Interview summaries and law enforcement notes
    • Audio recordings and internal memos

🧠 Key Context​

  • Redactions: Many documents were heavily redacted, and about 97% were previously public, according to committee Democrats.
  • Controversy: The release has sparked debate over selective disclosures, especially regarding high-profile individuals mentioned in the emails.
  • Ongoing production: The Department of Justice is still reviewing and releasing additional materials, so the total may grow further.

Would you like a summary of the most revealing or controversial names and exchanges found in the latest Epstein document batch? I can pull highlights from the November 2025 release.
 

Breakdown of Released Materials​

  • Total volume: Approximately 33,295 pages of records were released in early September 2025.
  • Additional batch: In November 2025, the committee released another 20,000 pages, bringing the cumulative total to over 53,000 pages.
  • Contents include:
    • Court filings and flight logs
    • Emails and private correspondence
    • Jail surveillance video (including 13 hours from the night of Epstein’s death)
    • Interview summaries and law enforcement notes
    • Audio recordings and internal memos

🧠 Key Context​

  • Redactions: Many documents were heavily redacted, and about 97% were previously public, according to committee Democrats.
  • Controversy: The release has sparked debate over selective disclosures, especially regarding high-profile individuals mentioned in the emails.
  • Ongoing production: The Department of Justice is still reviewing and releasing additional materials, so the total may grow further.
 
false world salad^^^ Dems have released many of the documents.

Breakdown of Released Materials​

  • Total volume: Approximately 33,295 pages of records were released in early September 2025.
  • Additional batch: In November 2025, the committee released another 20,000 pages, bringing the cumulative total to over 53,000 pages.
  • Contents include:
    • Court filings and flight logs
    • Emails and private correspondence
    • Jail surveillance video (including 13 hours from the night of Epstein’s death)
    • Interview summaries and law enforcement notes
    • Audio recordings and internal memos

🧠 Key Context​

  • Redactions: Many documents were heavily redacted, and about 97% were previously public, according to committee Democrats.
  • Controversy: The release has sparked debate over selective disclosures, especially regarding high-profile individuals mentioned in the emails.
  • Ongoing production: The Department of Justice is still reviewing and releasing additional materials, so the total may grow further.

Would you like a summary of the most revealing or controversial names and exchanges found in the latest Epstein document batch? I can pull highlights from the November 2025 release.
derp derp

I am speaking of 3 emails released on the 12th and 13th of November - the cherry picked ones

do you not know how a calendar works either?

Jake the Snake. hisssssss
 
@FastLane and other magats who post here, can we agree that this was actually one of the provable Deep State cover ups that happened when Alex Acosta broke the law to give Epstein a sweetheart deal and not inform the victims, and it seems to be because SO MANY powerful men were implicated from Bill Clinton to others?

I am fine if you want to believe only Libz were implicated and no key person on the right. I want this exposed if it is only Libz.

Do you not want it exposed and opened up now?

Why are magats not calling for this to be opened up and instead seeming to try and deflect under a 'if Biden did not do it, Trump should not' series of arguments?
 
JD Vance and Habba below, both core Trump Admin people have seen PROOF Dems are implicated. So why continue the Deep State protection of them saying as Fastlane does some version of 'Bidens incompetence to not expose this all means Trump should not'.

Fuck Biden and every Admin prior to him, including Trump 2016 and Obama who did not open this up and lets see Trump do the right thing now and open this up as so many in his campaign/administration held out that they would do.

-------------

JD Vance explicitly stated that “We know that Jeffrey Epstein had a lot of connections with left-wing politicians and left-wing billionaires … Democrat billionaires and Democrat political leaders went to Epstein Island all the time.” India Today+2WRAL News+2

-----------------
In a February interview with Piers Morgan, Alina Habba said:


“We have flight logs. We have information, names. That will come out.” Newsweek+2Yahoo News Canada+2


---------------

“I don’t see how it’s not shocking that there were so many individuals that were hidden and kept secret and [have] not been held accountable.” (Alina Habba) Newsweek+1
 
that is swamp food

someone's name and reputation should also not be able to be smeared with anonymous slander
Anonymous? I’m sorry, but the standards for the government punishing somebody are higher than what is required to believe something.

There are plenty of times where a person very reasonably believes something but it cannot be proven in a court of law. Two very different standards, we all know Donald Trump dies his hair, but there’s not enough evidence to prove it in court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Can u Lib POSs name one of Epstein's victims that have stated Trump did ANYTHING?

I will wait
chirp-chirp-chirp.gif
 
JD Vance and Habba below, both core Trump Admin people have seen PROOF Dems are implicated. So why continue the Deep State protection of them saying as Fastlane does some version of 'Bidens incompetence to not expose this all means Trump should not'.

Fuck Biden and every Admin prior to him, including Trump 2016 and Obama who did not open this up and lets see Trump do the right thing now and open this up as so many in his campaign/administration held out that they would do.

-------------

JD Vance explicitly stated that “We know that Jeffrey Epstein had a lot of connections with left-wing politicians and left-wing billionaires … Democrat billionaires and Democrat political leaders went to Epstein Island all the time.” India Today+2WRAL News+2

-----------------
In a February interview with Piers Morgan, Alina Habba said:





---------------

“I don’t see how it’s not shocking that there were so many individuals that were hidden and kept secret and [have] not been held accountable.” (Alina Habba) Newsweek+1
If there are Democrats in the file, I want them exposed, just as much as if there are Republicans. If there are billionaires in the files, I want them exposed just as much as if there are poor people.
 
Giuffre said that Trump did nothing.

From her 2015 Deposition:

"I have never seen Donald Trump on Epstein’s island... I never saw him have sex with any underage girls." When asked if Trump had ever done anything inappropriate, she replied, "No." She also denied that Trump flirted with her or was involved in sexual encounters with Epstein's victims.

Seriously, man. Do better. This information is available to everyone.
She "never saw" him do anything. She is one person. There were 100's of victims. YOU do better!
 
Anonymous? I’m sorry, but the standards for the government punishing somebody are higher than what is required to believe something.

Rather ironic coming from an unhinged leftist loon who wallows in the lie filled narratives of the left.

There are plenty of times where a person very reasonably believes something but it cannot be proven in a court of law. Two very different standards, we all know Donald Trump dies his hair, but there’s not enough evidence to prove it in court.

A moronic argument from the moron. You seldom disappoint when it comes to illustrate how brain dead the Democratic Progressive left is.
 
Rather ironic coming from an unhinged leftist loon who wallows in the lie filled narratives of the left.



A moronic argument from the moron. You seldom disappoint when it comes to illustrate how brain dead the Democratic Progressive left is.
All you ever have is insults, never any substance. This is why you are roundly ignored.
 
All you ever have is insults,

All you ever have are asinine lies and loony theories. Cry little man. :laugh:

never any substance.

Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.


This is why you are roundly ignored.

Like I give a shit when lying, brainless, unhinged halfwits like you ignore me?

laughing-laugh.gif
 
So what is your argument for keeping them hidden?
When have I EVER argued about keeping them hidden? LINK me up dumbfuck.

I am all for releasing all the information they have about Epstein because I know it is a NOTHING burger that will only expose Democrats and leftists.

I always have to laugh when brainless Kamala voters think they've got Trump on something and then get caught themselves. Much like the Russia collusion hoax which turned out to be a Clinton campaign hoax carried out by the corrupt dishonest Obama/Biden administration. Or the Ukraine hoax that turned out to be a Biden family grifting scheme.

If you had a brain, which you obviously do not, you would be embarrassed.
 
Back
Top