Filibuster... Kill it or save it?

Bipartisan JPP agreement to nuke the filibuster?

  • Yes lets hold hand and do this.

    Votes: 3 42.9%

  • No, fvck Trump i disagree. Keep it.

    Votes: 3 42.9%

  • I was for nuking it but not now i see Dems would like it.

    Votes: 1 14.3%
  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .
QP! said:
Is this the one item we can get a bipartisan majority on, on JPP with people from both sides saying 'Kill It'?

Trump wants it killed and i am all for that. Yes i agree with Trump on this issue.

My view is simple. Magats do not allow anything like 'Norms', 'laws', 'Senate Parliamentarians', etc to stop something in their agenda, if they truly want to do it. They will deny Obama his SC pick, they will simply not ask the Senate Parliamentarian if they can do something and just do it. They fire all the IG's and lawyers who could tell them no. It is only Democrats who ring their hands and get blocked by a Senate Parliamentarian and their singular view, etc and with Trump destroying all these checks and balances, with the Filibuster now on the block, this means the next and following Dem regimes will also be able to implement their agenda without the checks and balances.

Huge parts of Biden's last agenda were blocked by the Senate Parliamentarian and the filibuster, and those parts would have really helped working people and benefitted the voters.

So lets all agree with Trump in bipartisan JPP hand holding and burn the filibuster down.
Click to expand...
Wait until the Dems take back congress THEN kill it!
 
gfm7175 said:
Yes, nuke it. Dems will nuke it anyway if they were to ever get power back, so might as well beat them to the punch and actually implement a MAGA agenda in the meantime.
Click to expand...
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo... we'd NEVER do that! Trust us!
 
LurchAddams said:
Wait until the Dems take back congress THEN kill it!
Click to expand...
Hahaha.

Sorry but that does make me laugh.,

The same 'moderate Dem's who just caved to Trump would never vote to kill the filibuster as the filibuster is what "moderate Dems' use more than Republicans to block dem Potus populist agenda while allowing the more corporatist parts.

Dems would never kill it.
 
It's not the filibuster that is the problem. It's how immoral gangsters like Schumer use it that is the problem. Quit electing low lifes like Democrats to public office, is all. Pretty simple fix to most problems. Laws are useless when they're made and enforced by scumbags. It's a form of free speech, after all, and Democrats have been trying to kill that off big time, not just in govt. but colleges, the internet, everywhere. Fuck them.
 
ZenMode said:
Anyway, back to the topic .....

the filibuster is in place for a reason - some actions require more than a simple majority.
Click to expand...
It gives the minority time to give their case in full to the people one last time

The right hates sunlight

They live in the dark corners

That way they can hibernate instead getting woke day daylight
 
Jake Starkey said:
It would be democratic in that it would take only fifty plus one.

Than it would become authoritarian when the majority made absolute control.

MAGA will do that if able. Of that I have no doubt.

I would hope the dems would be fair, but I am not so sure. The AOCs and Mamdanis, just like the MAGA, would ram down the other sides throat and out their ass.
Click to expand...
Once the ReTrumpAgain party finishes stabbing it’s self to death with racism we can have a party emerge that actually fights for Americans instead of sucking the dick of anyone with enough cash to buy them


Two major parties that fight hard to come up a better plan than the other major party

What Americans used to be
 
gfm7175 said:
That IS the topic. The voters WANT Republicans to implement the MAGA agenda.

What reason?
Click to expand...
To prevent a party from steamrolling the country with a simple majority. All levels of government have many situations where more than a simple majority is necessary to pass legislation, make changes, etc.

You wouldn't be playing dumb if it were Dems in the position that Republicans are in.
 
ZenMode said:
To prevent a party from steamrolling the country with a simple majority. All levels of government have many situations where more than a simple majority is necessary to pass legislation, make changes, etc.

You wouldn't be playing dumb if it were Dems in the position that Republicans are in.
Click to expand...
It’s why the Republican Party worked so hard to turn the word compromise into an evil concept
 
evince said:
What?

You are so ashamed of your list you won’t repeat it for all to marvel at?
Click to expand...
I said it once in a different thread b cause its off topic for this asinine thread. But tell me why I need to repeat it? You can go marvel at it in my thread, or not I don't give a shit you retarded tampon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top