If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

WIth the intent of wiping out a group. Do you think Israel's actions reflect an attempt to wipe out all Gazans?
If one side in a war hides a communications center under a hospital or school and the opposing side the bombs that facility destroying both the communication center but also killing hundreds of children, is that a legal act of war according to the Geneva Convention?

Who, in your opinion, is ultimately responsible for the deaths of the children? Those who bombed them or those who used them as meat shields?
 
So your position is atheists, cultural relativists, and human secularists do not believe female genital mutilation and head hunting are inherently wrong, because they are sanctioned by the societies they exist in.
Why don't you try to avoid compound fallacies. Into the Night just told you that there is no absolute morality, ergo he isn't going to apply an absolute position of morality on any group of people, and he probably isn't going to try to speak for them.

... and I think you agree that female earlobe and tongue mutilation is perfectly fine, and is thus sanctioned by the societies in which they exist.
 
If one side in a war hides a communications center under a hospital or school and the opposing side the bombs that facility destroying both the communication center but also killing hundreds of children, is that a legal act of war according to the Geneva Convention?
The question of whether or not any given individual act violates the Geneva convention is a separate question from whether or not Israel is attempting to commit genocide.
 
Compassion The question of whether or not any given individual act violates the Geneva convention is a separate question from whether or not Israel is attempting to commit genocide.
Compassion is good, but killing evil people is also good.

Why do you support Hamas? Do you support "From the River to the Sea"? It's okay if you don't want to answer.
 
Irrelevant. There is a firm, concrete definition to which Israel formally agreed, for which Israel is a convention signatory, and that Israel ratified in its Knesset. That is all that matters.

The US is also a signatory to this definition and has ratified it in Congress.
Okay. Where's your link to what Israel agreed to?
 
Israel isn't killing civilians
AIPAC owns you. You give yourself away.

Israel is mowing down civilians who even remotely appear to be Arab. Israel is sniping Arab children who are simply waiting in line for food. Israel is killing Arabs out of sheer RACIST HATRED for Arabs.

Netanyahu promised Israelis that he would effect the 2nd Nakba and that is exactly what he is doing. Nobody was surprised when Abraham Lincoln, candidate of the Republican party, issued the Emancipation Proclamation. Nobody was surprised when Benjamin Netanyahu, leader of the Likud Party, the RACIST party of the 2nd Nakba, initiated the 2nd Nakba.

HAMAS is.
Impressive, considering they are all long-since dead. We've been over this many times, you are well of this. When asked to provide images of these "Hamas Fighters" of which you speak, you suddenly became aware that you had been led astray and instead of being honest about it, because AIPAC has you in their pocket, you decided to double down on total dishonesty and to make the lamest excuses as to why you can't find any images of Hamas fighters, only of Iran's proxy Al Qassam.

NOTHING outlaws warfare in the Geneva Convention.
Irrelevant.
1. Genocide is outlawed in its own Convention, which is not one of the Geneva Conventions.
2. The IV Geneva Convention certainly defines war crimes and outlaws them, and war crimes constitute about 85% of IDF terrorism.
 
Why are you begging for a link instead of just getting it yourself? Are you really that incompetent?
So, you can't support your claim? Hopefully you aren't under the impression that I'm going to believe something simply because you say it. I mean, you don't believe that, do you?
 
Compassion is good, but killing evil people is also good.

Why do you support Hamas? Do you support "From the River to the Sea"? It's okay if you don't want to answer.
First, I don't know how compassion got in there. Second, where in the world did you get the impression that I support Hamas?
 
First, I don't know how compassion got in there. Second, where in the world did you get the impression that I support Hamas?
Interesting. I love it when people reveal their true hearts. :)

Your condemnations of Israel without a peep about Hamas, constant attacks since 1948 nor October 7h speaks loudly.
 
As a Jew we don't care what you believe or don't just leave us the fuck alone we are not interested and heard it all before .

Thank You very much in this matter
 
Irrelevant. There is a firm, concrete definition to which Israel formally agreed, for which Israel is a convention signatory, and that Israel ratified in its Knesset. That is all that matters.

The US is also a signatory to this definition and has ratified it in Congress.
Israel is not HAMAS. The United States is not HAMAS.
 
Back
Top