The James scandal just keeps on giving

QP! said:
@T. A. Gardner never gets tired of being wrong.

He still maintains that the Oil and Gas industry has NEVER, EVER, got any gov't subsidies, direct or indirect, and despite it being widely known to be amongst the highest subsidized industries in American history, with tons of data, he simply hand waves every cited example, such as States providing tax payer land at below market costs to them, as not a subsidy. He then runs from the chats only to come back and state the same lie again later.

Same for his lie saying 'No Victim, No Crime' for Trumps documents fraud conviction saying 'since banks were repaid', while he maintains that Letisha is guilty of a crime despite 'No Victim, No Crime' and 'banks being repaid'.

So being wrong is Terry's default setting.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the poor guy's brainwashed. He actually asked me today that "if trump is really guilty of anything to list his crimes". He then again pivoted to Biden who he hates so much I think Biden must have shot T.A.'s dog or something! It's wacky the way he bashes Democrats but runs cover for trump, probably the most corrupt and evil human elected to public office in American history.

Anyway - it's weird, that's all I'll say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
LurchAddams said:
Yeah, the poor guy's brainwashed. He actually asked me today that "if trump is really guilty of anything to list his crimes". He then again pivoted to Biden who he hates so much I think Biden must have shot T.A.'s dog or something! It's wacky the way he bashes Democrats but runs cover for trump, probably the most corrupt and evil human elected to public office in American history.

Anyway - it's weird, that's all I'll say.
Click to expand...
@T. A. Gardner is a the perfect example of a cultist.

He will state Trump did not break any laws in any of the cases such as the fraud verdict James got against him and he will say 'No Victim, No crime', and even when you quote the exact law stating 'this law does not require a victim', he will keep repeating himself.

He is not saying 'i disagree with this law but understand it is a law', which would be fine. Nope Terry simply denies the law exists or believes his belief makes the law invalid and therefore Trump did not actually commit a crime because Terry does not like that law and believe it valid.

That is a cultist. They deny reality when it runs contrary to their Dear Leader. He does not poop because he says he does not and Terry will accept no other reality.
 
QP! said:
@T. A. Gardner is a the perfect example of a cultist.

He will state Trump did not break any laws in any of the cases such as the fraud verdict James got against him and he will say 'No Victim, No crime', and even when you quote the exact law stating 'this law does not require a victim', he will keep repeating himself.
Click to expand...
If that were the case, who else did Hunter hurt when he was using other than himself? And yet we were treated constantly to naked pics of him on the Republican house floor and TA was rock hard over it. It's a huge double-standard for him. I think, deep down, he hates Democrats so much that any corruption in his own party must stay hidden, because to admit a mistake would be weakness?
QP! said:
He is not saying 'i disagree with this law but understand it is a law', which would be fine. Nope Terry simply denies the law exists or believes his belief makes the law invalid and therefore Trump did not actually commit a crime because Terry does not like that law and believe it valid.
Click to expand...
Oh, he absolutely makes shit up when he's losing an argument. He actual tried to snow me that "trump didn't need to release his tax returns because of FOIA". That was the starkest example of his employing lies, basically to avoid admitting trump was fucking hiding shit from Americans that ever other president before him gave up.

Also, anything a Democrat proposes of advocates for is "automatically bad".
QP! said:
That is a cultist. They deny reality when it runs contrary to their Dear Leader. He does not poop because he says he does not and Terry will accept no other reality.
Click to expand...
I think with Terry it's different. He doesn't "like" Republicans as much as he HATES democrats. It's hate, rather than allegiance to any particular party or anything that motivates TA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
LurchAddams said:
If that were the case, who else did Hunter hurt when he was using other than himself? And yet we were treated constantly to naked pics of him on the Republican house floor and TA was rock hard over it. It's a huge double-standard for him. I think, deep down, he hates Democrats so much that any corruption in his own party must stay hidden, because to admit a mistake would be weakness?

Oh, he absolutely makes shit up when he's losing an argument. He actual tried to snow me that "trump didn't need to release his tax returns because of FOIA". That was the starkest example of his employing lies, basically to avoid admitting trump was fucking hiding shit from Americans that ever other president before him gave up.

Also, anything a Democrat proposes of advocates for is "automatically bad".

I think with Terry it's different. He doesn't "like" Republicans as much as he HATES democrats. It's hate, rather than allegiance to any particular party or anything that motivates TA.
Click to expand...

Magats are a cult...full stop.

They will go on non stop that 'people buying Hunters art at inflated prices (thousands of dollars) are "buying influence" and want that investigated as a crime against Hunter and Joe Biden". They support and excuse Jarad Kushner and Trump and his kids getting billions of dollars in DIRECT payments in ways that any other administration prior would have faced investigation and indictments over.

People on the left say 'if Bill Clinton and Bill Gates etc are in the Epstein files... if Hunter and Joe were engaged in criminality... investigate and get them'... but these cultist demand no investigations in to their Dear Leader and all those nearest him, and would say 'yes investigate Hunter and Bill Clinton and Bill Gates but leave Trump and Co alone'.
 
LurchAddams said:
If that were the case, who else did Hunter hurt when he was using other than himself? And yet we were treated constantly to naked pics of him on the Republican house floor and TA was rock hard over it. It's a huge double-standard for him. I think, deep down, he hates Democrats so much that any corruption in his own party must stay hidden, because to admit a mistake would be weakness?

Oh, he absolutely makes shit up when he's losing an argument. He actual tried to snow me that "trump didn't need to release his tax returns because of FOIA". That was the starkest example of his employing lies, basically to avoid admitting trump was fucking hiding shit from Americans that ever other president before him gave up.

Also, anything a Democrat proposes of advocates for is "automatically bad".

I think with Terry it's different. He doesn't "like" Republicans as much as he HATES democrats. It's hate, rather than allegiance to any particular party or anything that motivates TA.
Click to expand...
Lot's of police officers have been injured or killed enforcing the drug laws that Hunter was violating. And why are you interested in TA's boners.
 
FastLane said:
Lot's of police officers have been injured or killed enforcing the drug laws that Hunter was violating. And why are you interested in TA's boners.
Click to expand...
You loved what happened on J6. Please don't lie and claim you give 2 shits about cop's safety.

Go suck Trump's tiny dick some more you useless troll.
 
FastLane said:
Lot's of police officers have been injured or killed enforcing the drug laws that Hunter was violating. And why are you interested in TA's boners.
Click to expand...
so everyone who uses a drug casual or not is responsible for the harm and crimes done in the drug trade?

What about everyone who speeds or drinks. Lots of people die to speeders each year so is everyone who speeds also responsible for that?. Lots of people die in alcohol related deaths and crimes, so is everyone who buys alcohol even legally, that ends up providing support to alcohol companies, which also has those negative and illegal outcomes, also responsible for that?

Show us you are not again just saying stupid stuff and can defend your post.
 
FastLane said:
Actually I didn't love it at all. I thought it was EXACTLY what Nancy wanted.

Why are you so fixated on other men's penises?
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, but after several years of hoping I'd see something honest of thoughtful from you, you've just devolved into an evil, lying, hate-filled troll.

Goodbye!
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
QP! said:
so everyone who uses a drug casual or not is responsible for the harm and crimes done in the drug trade?

What about everyone who speeds or drinks. Lots of people die to speeders each year so is everyone who speeds also responsible for that?. Lots of people die in alcohol related deaths and crimes, so is everyone who buys alcohol even legally, that ends up providing support to alcohol companies, which also has those negative and illegal outcomes, also responsible for that?

Show us you are not again just saying stupid stuff and can defend your post.
Click to expand...
Yes in part. And we penalize speeders and people who drink and drive be a use people that do it harm others. Hunter was massively doing illegal drugs. The trafficking of illegal drugs hurts others.
 
Last edited:
The James scandal will fade away because there is no case. When it does, the Trumpys talking about the horrible scandal will merely move on to the next lie and claim it is a terrible damaging case on the left.
 
FastLane said:
Yes in part. And we penalize speeders and people who drink and drive be a use people that do it arm others. Hunter was massively doing illegal drugs. The trafficking of illegal drugs hurts others.
Click to expand...
We hold them responsible for WHAT THEY DO. A speeder gets a speeding ticket, but IS NOT held responsible for the 'deaths of people by other speeders'. A person who has a casual drink at the bar and walks home is NOT responsible for a drunk driver.

You are trying to suggest that Hunters personal use and punishment extends to the externalities of drug trafficking and the crimes that happen.

So again should we be tagging on to speeding and casual drinking punishments that extend to crimes that happen more broadly?
 
QP! said:
We hold them responsible for WHAT THEY DO. A speeder gets a speeding ticket, but IS NOT held responsible for the 'deaths of people by other speeders'. A person who has a casual drink at the bar and walks home is NOT responsible for a drunk driver.

You are trying to suggest that Hunters personal use and punishment extends to the externalities of drug trafficking and the crimes that happen.

So again should we be tagging on to speeding and casual drinking punishments that extend to crimes that happen more broadly?
Click to expand...
So Ashli Babbitt was only responsible for her crime of trespassing and not for the mob behind her.
 
FastLane said:
So Ashli Babbitt was only responsible for her crime of trespassing and not for the mob behind her.
Click to expand...
such a stupid attempted jump.

A mob, acting in concert, is always responsible for the mobs actions.

Only a stupid person tries to equate that with a drug user or someone drinking at a bar walking home then being responsible for greater drug or alcohol crimes.

This is how a brain melts in a cult trying to justify and link things that do not equate.

You are literally trying to equate a person smoking a joint on their patio after dinner, with larger drug crimes and the need to share punishement across that grouping, with a mob acting towards a common goal(s) and causing harm and saying if the latter share levels of collective blame and legal liability so to should the drug user or guy who drinks wine with dinner.

That is because you are stupid.

Sorry to say that but it is inexplicably true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top