Civil War

Its a direct rebuttal do your argument about tariffs causing domestic oligarchies.

oh no, don't throw me in that Tariff Patch, Br'er dumbass.

you forgot, you're not arguing with some dumb cultural marxist.

you got me on the line and i'll break your pole and pull you in the water.
At least somebody knows who Br'er Rabbit is.
Many have been deprived of knowing who that is.
A century or more of Uncle Remus was in America.
And no, it was not racist, it was reality of the situation.
Many truths were told in Uncle Remus.
Leftards have no clue who that is I bet.
Thank God I grew up in a different America than that.
 
Lincoln had more support among the 100 War Democrats in Congress and the Senate than he did most Republicans. The only member of his Cabinet who supported going to war was a turncoat Democrat, his Postmaster General; Winfield Scott and the only actual abolitionist in his Cabinet, Seward, opposed it, along with the other six members.
Yeah, you've read some stuff.
Aw, dude, when I was young, there was a Matthew Brady Civil War picture tacked to my great-grandma's cedar chest.
It was a battalion. It may still be around. The Cedar Chest is..
 
Yeah, you've read some stuff.
Aw, dude, when I was young, there was a Matthew Brady Civil War picture tacked to my great-grandma's cedar chest.
It was a battalion. It may still be around. The Cedar Chest is..

I've read real history. One of my ancestors started a Cavalry unit that was later absorbed into the Union Army, so it's not like I have any family who fought for the South; I just prefer real history to ideological rubbish. The South shot itself in the foot because of their slave economy discouraging white immigration and the mindless pursuit of laissez faire, which is why they lost the war; they never invested anything in other enterprises, their capital followed the highest returns, so they never invested anything in ship building, ironworks, or railroads.

This guy says it all for me:


And here is what bothers me so much about modern "scholarship." At what point did history become ethics? Why should we subvert the elusive search for facts to moralist concerns? So what if they are on or off the hook? If you want to be a preacher, go preach. If you want to save the world, go into politics. If you want to invent a world free of evil, take prozac. It was said in Ecclesiastes and it still is true today,people suck. They did then, all of them. They do now, all of us.History is the history of self-interested, competing, aggressive,selfish, murderous humans. At what point did it become a morality play? -Dave WIlliams, George mason Univ.

I'm the with Jewish history or anybody else's. My Conservative Jewish grandparents were the same away about Jewish history, and didn't buy the current propaganda nonsense put out about the 'centuries of evul Xian hatred and bigotry' currently peddled by their own propagandists. They pointed out that Jews fared far better than most ever did as a people, and virtually all their problems were self-inflicted, same with every other peoples on the planet; they were self-isolating arrogant snobs who thought themselves a 'master race'. Not until their own 'min-Enlightenment' in the late 18th and early 19th centuries did they become the great movers of science and secular literature they have been the last 300 years or so, and are no more special than any other families who emphasized education and literacy among its children.
 
I've read real history. One of my ancestors started a Cavalry unit that was later absorbed into the Union Army, so it's not like I have any family who fought for the South; I just prefer real history to ideological rubbish. The South shot itself in the foot because of their slave economy discouraging white immigration and the mindless pursuit of laissez faire, which is why they lost the war; they never invested anything in other enterprises, their capital followed the highest returns, so they never invested anything in ship building, ironworks, or railroads.

This guy says it all for me:


And here is what bothers me so much about modern "scholarship." At what point did history become ethics? Why should we subvert the elusive search for facts to moralist concerns? So what if they are on or off the hook? If you want to be a preacher, go preach. If you want to save the world, go into politics. If you want to invent a world free of evil, take prozac. It was said in Ecclesiastes and it still is true today,people suck. They did then, all of them. They do now, all of us.History is the history of self-interested, competing, aggressive,selfish, murderous humans. At what point did it become a morality play? -Dave WIlliams, George mason Univ.

I'm the with Jewish history or anybody else's. My Conservative Jewish grandparents were the same away about Jewish history, and didn't buy the current propaganda nonsense put out about the 'centuries of evul Xian hatred and bigotry' currently peddled by their own propagandists. They pointed out that Jews fared far better than most ever did as a people, and virtually all their problems were self-inflicted, same with every other peoples on the planet; they were self-isolating arrogant snobs who thought themselves a 'master race'. Not until their own 'min-Enlightenment' in the late 18th and early 19th centuries did they become the great movers of science and secular literature they have been the last 300 years or so, and are no more special than any other families who emphasized education and literacy among its children.
thank you for being an honest Jew.

so many are still trying to control everbody and be assholes.

protectionism really is smartest though, globalist Jew bastard.
 
At least somebody knows who Br'er Rabbit is.
Many have been deprived of knowing who that is.
A century or more of Uncle Remus was in America.
And no, it was not racist, it was reality of the situation.
Many truths were told in Uncle Remus.
Leftards have no clue who that is I bet.
Thank God I grew up in a different America than that.
the real moral of the post is tariffs are smart.

the internationalist view point is detached elitist asshole stuff.
 
the real spectre of fascism is government taking ownership of corporations or the natural resources of other nations.

how do I cash out my shares?

we must be ever vigilant.

fascism is the union of government and corporate power.

lefties call it public private partnership.

righties are calling it ______________.
 
Irrelevant to anything I said here, not to mention all stuff I've said myself.

AS for 'neocons', REagan kept the MFN trade status for Red China, and loved subsidizing moving plants overseas. The status had to be renewed every year, and REagan supported it his entire 8 years. You don't know shit about 'neocons', you just parrot it whenever you're at a loss for real facts.
no.

you did start blather on about how "too much protectionism makes oligarches grow here" . <--paraphrasing.

I'm watching you sneaky Jew.
 
protectionism really is smartest though, globalist Jew bastard.

lol lunatic level tariffs aren't protectionist', dumbass, they're just stupid and don't do anything but promote stupidity and oligarchs.

And, I'm not Jewish, my grandparents on my father's side were. You're just a nutjob, is all.
 
lol lunatic level tariffs aren't protectionist', dumbass, they're just stupid and don't do anything but promote stupidity and oligarchs.

And, I'm not Jewish, my grandparents on my father's side were. You're just a nutjob, is all.
you said this before, it's still dumb.

I know it's hard for you to give up your globalist stupidity,

it's deeply ingrained in many.

you'll be ok.
 
You are a blowhard. Nothing more. You gaslight only yourself, you wuss.

Here is reality. The fascist left is concentrated in a few very large cities. Communists rule Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, New York. But outside of these urban hell holes the nation belongs to the Americans. The split may not be North and South - but it is well defined. Urban vs Suburban / Rural

While the number of people on each side is pretty evenly split, the rest is not. We the Americans have 90% of the guns, 90% of the ammunition, and we are the ones who know how to use them. We are the hunters and the sportsmen. But that's not what will end you fascists. You are concentrated in cities and depend on us to ship in your food, your water, your power. The first thing we are going to do is cut that off. We won't invade you cities, no need. We'll just starve you out.

You'd last a week - tops.
 
At least somebody knows who Br'er Rabbit is.
Many have been deprived of knowing who that is.
A century or more of Uncle Remus was in America.
And no, it was not racist, it was reality of the situation.
Many truths were told in Uncle Remus.
Leftards have no clue who that is I bet.
Thank God I grew up in a different America than that.

Uncle Remus is the opposite of racism. He was one who taught little white children that black men were not frightening, instead were endearing.

The left are just evil and seek to destroy anything pure and good.
 
I've read real history. One of my ancestors started a Cavalry unit that was later absorbed into the Union Army, so it's not like I have any family who fought for the South; I just prefer real history to ideological rubbish. The South shot itself in the foot because of their slave economy discouraging white immigration and the mindless pursuit of laissez faire, which is why they lost the war; they never invested anything in other enterprises, their capital followed the highest returns, so they never invested anything in ship building, ironworks, or railroads.

This guy says it all for me:


And here is what bothers me so much about modern "scholarship." At what point did history become ethics? Why should we subvert the elusive search for facts to moralist concerns? So what if they are on or off the hook? If you want to be a preacher, go preach. If you want to save the world, go into politics. If you want to invent a world free of evil, take prozac. It was said in Ecclesiastes and it still is true today,people suck. They did then, all of them. They do now, all of us.History is the history of self-interested, competing, aggressive,selfish, murderous humans. At what point did it become a morality play? -Dave WIlliams, George mason Univ.

I'm the with Jewish history or anybody else's. My Conservative Jewish grandparents were the same away about Jewish history, and didn't buy the current propaganda nonsense put out about the 'centuries of evul Xian hatred and bigotry' currently peddled by their own propagandists. They pointed out that Jews fared far better than most ever did as a people, and virtually all their problems were self-inflicted, same with every other peoples on the planet; they were self-isolating arrogant snobs who thought themselves a 'master race'. Not until their own 'min-Enlightenment' in the late 18th and early 19th centuries did they become the great movers of science and secular literature they have been the last 300 years or so, and are no more special than any other families who emphasized education and literacy among its children.

The democrats wanted war. Lincoln and the Republicans did not. That is historical fact as we all know. The attack on Sumpter alone shows that the democrats were itching for war.

When you intersperse "Laissez Faire" and "Slave Economy" you lose credibility. A free market cannot forcibly enslave anyone.

The South was run by a small group of Oligarchs - George Soros, Tim Cook types of their day. Like the democrat Oligarchs of today, the government served the will of the Oligarchs then. It was a Feudal system, not Capitalist.

My grandparents were also conservative Jews. FDR betrayed Jews fleeing Germany and they never would have anything to do with his party.
 
Back
Top