The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

Lionfish said:
Re-read your post. Nowhere does it say we hire based on ability, which is something that always worked until you woke morons entered the picture.
You are a product of lowering the standards until everyone can pass the test, woke crowd.

1. "Expands the talent pool"
How, filling it up with more unqualified individuals because of the color of their skin,
Click to expand...
No. It ensures that qualified people are not being overlooked/ignored.
Lionfish said:
or the fact that they have 15 genders?
Click to expand...
Why bring such silliness in here?
Lionfish said:
2. "Removes historical barriers"
What historical barriers? You should be hiring to get the job done. It has nothing to do with history.
Click to expand...
Racism is rooted in America's history.
Lionfish said:
3. "Promotes fairer assessments"
If you mean more applicants, yes. As long as the standards remain, I will agree.
Click to expand...
I agree that the standards should temain the same.
Lionfish said:
4. "Creates a stronger workforce"
You, yourself, contradict yourself in that sentence. DEI hiring does just the opposite.
Click to expand...
Again, DEI ensures that people with the right qualifications are not being ignored based on race and gender.
Lionfish said:
Please don't respond, I have shit to do and it does not involve you and your one sentence word games.
Click to expand...
It's for everyone, not just you.
 
AProudLefty said:
Looks like our conversation is for naught. One more time... I agree with you on your first point.

Supporting DEI is supporting making sure that well qualified is not being overlooked. It's anti-racist and anti-sexist.
Click to expand...
So say the ATC school in Oklahoma only accepts people that score at least 85 on their qualifications exam. But not enough minorities scoreed an 85 or above so they lower the acceptance rate to 80. More minorities make it in but the flunk out rate at ATC school increases to 30%. The fact that these lower qualified applicants of all races graduate as ATC is not a good thing for the flying public.
 
FastLane said:
So say the ATC school in Oklahoma only accepts people that score at least 85 on their qualifications exam. But not enough minorities scoreed an 85 or above so they lower the acceptance rate to 80. More minorities make it in but the flunk out rate at ATC school increases to 30%. The fact that these lower qualified applicants of all races graduate as ATC is not a good thing for the flying public.
Click to expand...
Like I said, the lawsuit is ongoing I believe.
 
Lionfish said:
Re-read your post. Nowhere does it say we hire based on ability, which is something that always worked until you woke morons entered the picture.
You are a product of lowering the standards until everyone can pass the test, woke crowd.

1. "Expands the talent pool"
How, filling it up with more unqualified individuals because of the color of their skin, or the fact that they have 15 genders?
2. "Removes historical barriers"
What historical barriers? You should be hiring to get the job done. It has nothing to do with history.
3. "Promotes fairer assessments"
If you mean more applicants, yes. As long as the standards remain, I will agree.
4. "Creates a stronger workforce"
You, yourself, contradict yourself in that sentence. DEI hiring does just the opposite.

Please don't respond, I have shit to do and it does not involve you and your one sentence word games.
Click to expand...
EXACTLY
 
FastLane said:
Should we have quotas?
Click to expand...
AI Overview



+4
DEI = Hiring Quotas | Shauna Cole
No, legally and in practice, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs do not use quotas; instead, they set measurable goals to increase opportunities for underrepresented groups by removing barriers to thriving in the workplace and education. Quotas are illegal and prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while DEI initiatives aim to create fair environments and expand the applicant pool, not to mandate hiring unqualified individuals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top