The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

AProudLefty said:
AI Overview



+6
No, DEI initiatives do not lower hiring standards, but rather aim to remove barriers and biases in the hiring process to ensure a wider talent pool is considered.

To answer your question, it would be wrong.
Click to expand...
AI isn't correct. They lowered the admission standards to the air traffic controllers school in order to admit more minority students. And guess what happened? They had more washouts.

Biden admin scrapped ‘best-qualified’ standard for air traffic controller academy, docs show​


nypost.com

Biden admin scrapped ‘best-qualified’ standard for air traffic controller academy, docs show

In 2023, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials scrapped the previous “best qualified” tier for candidates who scored 85% or above on the Air Traffic Skills Assessment (ATSA) e…
nypost.com nypost.com


The Biden administration quietly eliminated the top testing threshold for the highest-performing applicants seeking to become air traffic controllers, an internal slide seen by The Post confirms.

In 2023, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials scrapped the previous “best qualified” tier for candidates who scored 85% or above on the Air Traffic Skills Assessment (ATSA) exam in favor of a “well qualified” threshold for applicants who scored at least 80%......“What happened was, they had a substantial washout rate, 30%-plus,” Duffy went on, “because they couldn’t do the work.”
 
Last edited:
Actually, If anyone grew up in Columbus they could have been in my classes if they were in Jr. High or HS anytime after 1977...
 
Racism doesn't happened if the entire process is neutral...
FastLane said:
If you put them in the place of a better qualified person of another race you are making the decision based on race and that is the very definition of racism. If you support DEI you are supporting racism.
Click to expand...
Correct...the way things have gone in the past...
 
FastLane said:
If you put them in the place of a better qualified person of another race you are making the decision based on race and that is the very definition of racism. If you support DEI you are supporting racism.
Click to expand...
Looks like our conversation is for naught. One more time... I agree with you on your first point.

Supporting DEI is supporting making sure that well qualified is not being overlooked. It's anti-racist and anti-sexist.
 
TOP said:
Racism doesn't happened if the entire process is neutral...
Correct...the way things have gone in the past...
Click to expand...
I agree and detest that decisions were made on the bases of race and the CERTAINLY justified a race neutral hiring system. But it certainly does not justify the racism of DEI. Racism should be eliminated in all forms. Equality of opportunity not equality of outcome. Outcome is what people make of equal opportunity. Some people are more driven and work harder and should be rewarded if they are a top candidate.
 
FastLane said:
I agree and detest that decisions were made on the bases of race and the CERTAINLY justified a race neutral hiring system. But it certainly does not justify the racism of DEI. Racism should be eliminated in all forms. Equality of opportunity not equality of outcome. Outcome is what people make of equal opportunity. Some people are more driven and work harder and should be rewarded if they are a top candidate.
Click to expand...
Far too often decisions are just quotas and check the boxes...and too often, those choices are completely unacceptable...and the more qualified people lose out...which means everyone loses...
 
Why DEI is seen as enhancing meritocracy:
    • Expands the talent pool
      by ensuring more qualified candidates have a fair chance.
    • Removes historical barriers
      and biases that historically excluded talented individuals from certain groups.
    • Promotes fairer assessments
      of merit by mitigating unconscious biases that may influence hiring and promotion decisions.
    • Creates a stronger workforce
      where qualifications, skills, and performance become the primary basis for advancement, not privilege.
 
How does that process listed above actually "work"? (Answer....it doesn't work...) That's why DEI has been eliminated...worst "process" ever...
 
It shows that it isn't racism. I'm glad that well qualified Black men and women are not being overlooked.

Now that DEI has been "eliminated" (it isn't), we'll have to trust that there is no systemic racism and sexism.
 
AProudLefty said:
Why DEI is seen as enhancing meritocracy:
    • Expands the talent pool
      by ensuring more qualified candidates have a fair chance.
    • Removes historical barriers
      and biases that historically excluded talented individuals from certain groups.
    • Promotes fairer assessments
      of merit by mitigating unconscious biases that may influence hiring and promotion decisions.
    • Creates a stronger workforce
      where qualifications, skills, and performance become the primary basis for advancement, not privilege.
Click to expand...
Re-read your post. Nowhere does it say we hire based on ability, which is something that always worked until you woke morons entered the picture.
You are a product of lowering the standards until everyone can pass the test, woke crowd.

1. "Expands the talent pool"
How, filling it up with more unqualified individuals because of the color of their skin, or the fact that they have 15 genders?
2. "Removes historical barriers"
What historical barriers? You should be hiring to get the job done. It has nothing to do with history.
3. "Promotes fairer assessments"
If you mean more applicants, yes. As long as the standards remain, I will agree.
4. "Creates a stronger workforce"
You, yourself, contradict yourself in that sentence. DEI hiring does just the opposite.

Please don't respond, I have shit to do and it does not involve you and your one sentence word games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top